Fungal disease of cacao

What type of information exists that could aid biocontrol researchers in their quests for agents that might compete with species of fungi that cause diseases, or prevent the interaction of pathogens with cacao? I probably have not answered this question satisfactorily, but I do know that the abundant literature that addresses diseases caused by fungal pathogens of cacao contains many facts. Reading literature can provide factual information about a disease and its hosts, but facts gleaned from the literature may improve one's understanding of existing preformed concepts. Facts about fungal diseases of cacao should form the base on which ideas to move beyond the present knowledge must be built. One should be critical when reading articles about pathogens and diseases. Just because something has been published does not actually make it true. But when one reads scientific articles receptivity for facts may, or may not be established. When articles divulge facts or information to advance an individual's knowledge, those facts may or may not be received. Also reading an article once may not allow the assimilation of the facts contained there in, but facts that could move one forward might be there waiting to be harvested. Reading articles more than once even several times may highlight a fact that will trigger thought along a line to formulate a new idea as to a solution to a perceived problem. Ideas generated from facts are the why and wherefore of research, and the doldrums of "facts only" is the home of far too many.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 76650 Hebbar, P. eds., 107194 Purdy, L.H., 39475 Krauss, U., 3680 CABI Bioscience, Londres (RU), CATIE - Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza Turrialba, Costa Rica autor/a 3977, 6915 Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC (EUA). Agricultural Research Service, Workshop on Research Methodology in Biocontrol of Plant Diseases with Special Reference to Fungal Diseases of Cocoa Turrialba (Costa Rica) 28 Jun - 4 Jul 1999
Format: biblioteca
Published: Turrialba (Costa Rica) 1999
Subjects:THEOBROMA CACAO, CRINIPELLIS PERNICIOSA, MONILIOPHTHORA RORERI, ONCOBASIDIUM THEOBROMAE, ARMILLARIA MELLEA, GANODERMA PHILLIPPII, VERTICILLIUM DAHLIAE, MARASMIUS PERNICIOSUS, MUERTE DESCENDENTE, CERATOCYSTIS, BUBA DE PUNTOS VERDES, CONTROL BIOLOGICO, SINTOMAS,
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:What type of information exists that could aid biocontrol researchers in their quests for agents that might compete with species of fungi that cause diseases, or prevent the interaction of pathogens with cacao? I probably have not answered this question satisfactorily, but I do know that the abundant literature that addresses diseases caused by fungal pathogens of cacao contains many facts. Reading literature can provide factual information about a disease and its hosts, but facts gleaned from the literature may improve one's understanding of existing preformed concepts. Facts about fungal diseases of cacao should form the base on which ideas to move beyond the present knowledge must be built. One should be critical when reading articles about pathogens and diseases. Just because something has been published does not actually make it true. But when one reads scientific articles receptivity for facts may, or may not be established. When articles divulge facts or information to advance an individual's knowledge, those facts may or may not be received. Also reading an article once may not allow the assimilation of the facts contained there in, but facts that could move one forward might be there waiting to be harvested. Reading articles more than once even several times may highlight a fact that will trigger thought along a line to formulate a new idea as to a solution to a perceived problem. Ideas generated from facts are the why and wherefore of research, and the doldrums of "facts only" is the home of far too many.