An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle

We carried out an inter-laboratory trial to compare the serological tests commonly used for the detection of specific Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle in Ibero-American countries. A total of eight laboratories participated from the following countries: Argentina (n = 4), Brazil (n = 1), Peru (n = 1), Mexico (n = 1), and Spain (n = 1). A blind panel of well-characterized cattle sera (n = 143) and sera representative of the target population (n = 351) was tested by seven in-house indirect fluorescent antibody tests (IFATs 1–7) and three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs 1–3; two in-house and one commercial). Diagnostic performance of the serological tests was calculated and compared according to the following criteria: (1) the “Pre-test information,” which uses previous epidemiological and serological data; (2) the “Majority of tests,” which classifies a serum as positive or negative according to the results obtained by most tests evaluated. Unexpectedly, six tests showed either sensitivity (Se) or specificity (Sp) values lower than 90%. In contrast, the best tests in terms of Se, Sp, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were IFAT 1 and optimized ELISA 1 and ELISA 2. We evaluated a high number of IFATs, which are the most widely used tests in Ibero-America. The significant discordances observed among the tests regardless of the criteria employed hinder control programs and urge the use of a common test or with similar performances to either the optimized IFAT 1 and ELISAs 1 and 2.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Campero, Lucía María, Moreno-Gonzalo, Javier, Venturini, María Cecilia, Moré, Gastón, Dellarupe, Andrea, Rambeaud, Magdalena, Echaide, Ignacio Eduardo, Valentini, Beatriz Susana, Campero, Carlos Manuel, Moore, Prando Dadin, Cano, Dora Beatriz, Fort, Marcelo Cristian, Mota, Rinaldo A., Serrano-Martínez, Marcos E., Cruz-Vázquez, Carlos, Ortega-Mora, Luis M., Álvarez-García, Gema
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: 2018-01
Subjects:Ganado Bovino, Neospora caninum, Anticuerpos, Experimentación en Laboratorio, Técnicas Inmunológicas, Cattle, Antibodies, Laboratory Experimentation, Immunological Techniques, Ibero América,
Online Access:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11250-017-1401-x
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2908
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1401-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-2908
record_format koha
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Ganado Bovino
Neospora caninum
Anticuerpos
Experimentación en Laboratorio
Técnicas Inmunológicas
Cattle
Antibodies
Laboratory Experimentation
Immunological Techniques
Ibero América
Ganado Bovino
Neospora caninum
Anticuerpos
Experimentación en Laboratorio
Técnicas Inmunológicas
Cattle
Antibodies
Laboratory Experimentation
Immunological Techniques
Ibero América
spellingShingle Ganado Bovino
Neospora caninum
Anticuerpos
Experimentación en Laboratorio
Técnicas Inmunológicas
Cattle
Antibodies
Laboratory Experimentation
Immunological Techniques
Ibero América
Ganado Bovino
Neospora caninum
Anticuerpos
Experimentación en Laboratorio
Técnicas Inmunológicas
Cattle
Antibodies
Laboratory Experimentation
Immunological Techniques
Ibero América
Campero, Lucía María
Moreno-Gonzalo, Javier
Venturini, María Cecilia
Moré, Gastón
Dellarupe, Andrea
Rambeaud, Magdalena
Echaide, Ignacio Eduardo
Valentini, Beatriz Susana
Campero, Carlos Manuel
Moore, Prando Dadin
Cano, Dora Beatriz
Fort, Marcelo Cristian
Mota, Rinaldo A.
Serrano-Martínez, Marcos E.
Cruz-Vázquez, Carlos
Ortega-Mora, Luis M.
Álvarez-García, Gema
An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle
description We carried out an inter-laboratory trial to compare the serological tests commonly used for the detection of specific Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle in Ibero-American countries. A total of eight laboratories participated from the following countries: Argentina (n = 4), Brazil (n = 1), Peru (n = 1), Mexico (n = 1), and Spain (n = 1). A blind panel of well-characterized cattle sera (n = 143) and sera representative of the target population (n = 351) was tested by seven in-house indirect fluorescent antibody tests (IFATs 1–7) and three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs 1–3; two in-house and one commercial). Diagnostic performance of the serological tests was calculated and compared according to the following criteria: (1) the “Pre-test information,” which uses previous epidemiological and serological data; (2) the “Majority of tests,” which classifies a serum as positive or negative according to the results obtained by most tests evaluated. Unexpectedly, six tests showed either sensitivity (Se) or specificity (Sp) values lower than 90%. In contrast, the best tests in terms of Se, Sp, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were IFAT 1 and optimized ELISA 1 and ELISA 2. We evaluated a high number of IFATs, which are the most widely used tests in Ibero-America. The significant discordances observed among the tests regardless of the criteria employed hinder control programs and urge the use of a common test or with similar performances to either the optimized IFAT 1 and ELISAs 1 and 2.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
topic_facet Ganado Bovino
Neospora caninum
Anticuerpos
Experimentación en Laboratorio
Técnicas Inmunológicas
Cattle
Antibodies
Laboratory Experimentation
Immunological Techniques
Ibero América
author Campero, Lucía María
Moreno-Gonzalo, Javier
Venturini, María Cecilia
Moré, Gastón
Dellarupe, Andrea
Rambeaud, Magdalena
Echaide, Ignacio Eduardo
Valentini, Beatriz Susana
Campero, Carlos Manuel
Moore, Prando Dadin
Cano, Dora Beatriz
Fort, Marcelo Cristian
Mota, Rinaldo A.
Serrano-Martínez, Marcos E.
Cruz-Vázquez, Carlos
Ortega-Mora, Luis M.
Álvarez-García, Gema
author_facet Campero, Lucía María
Moreno-Gonzalo, Javier
Venturini, María Cecilia
Moré, Gastón
Dellarupe, Andrea
Rambeaud, Magdalena
Echaide, Ignacio Eduardo
Valentini, Beatriz Susana
Campero, Carlos Manuel
Moore, Prando Dadin
Cano, Dora Beatriz
Fort, Marcelo Cristian
Mota, Rinaldo A.
Serrano-Martínez, Marcos E.
Cruz-Vázquez, Carlos
Ortega-Mora, Luis M.
Álvarez-García, Gema
author_sort Campero, Lucía María
title An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle
title_short An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle
title_full An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle
title_fullStr An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle
title_full_unstemmed An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle
title_sort ibero-american inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-neospora caninum antibodies in cattle
publishDate 2018-01
url https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11250-017-1401-x
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2908
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1401-x
work_keys_str_mv AT camperoluciamaria aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT morenogonzalojavier aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT venturinimariacecilia aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT moregaston aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT dellarupeandrea aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT rambeaudmagdalena aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT echaideignacioeduardo aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT valentinibeatrizsusana aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT camperocarlosmanuel aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT mooreprandodadin aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT canodorabeatriz aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT fortmarcelocristian aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT motarinaldoa aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT serranomartinezmarcose aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT cruzvazquezcarlos aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT ortegamoraluism aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT alvarezgarciagema aniberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT camperoluciamaria iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT morenogonzalojavier iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT venturinimariacecilia iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT moregaston iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT dellarupeandrea iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT rambeaudmagdalena iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT echaideignacioeduardo iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT valentinibeatrizsusana iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT camperocarlosmanuel iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT mooreprandodadin iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT canodorabeatriz iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT fortmarcelocristian iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT motarinaldoa iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT serranomartinezmarcose iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT cruzvazquezcarlos iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT ortegamoraluism iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
AT alvarezgarciagema iberoamericaninterlaboratorytrialtoevaluateserologicaltestsforthedetectionofantineosporacaninumantibodiesincattle
_version_ 1756007188727332864
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-29082021-04-26T16:49:23Z An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle Campero, Lucía María Moreno-Gonzalo, Javier Venturini, María Cecilia Moré, Gastón Dellarupe, Andrea Rambeaud, Magdalena Echaide, Ignacio Eduardo Valentini, Beatriz Susana Campero, Carlos Manuel Moore, Prando Dadin Cano, Dora Beatriz Fort, Marcelo Cristian Mota, Rinaldo A. Serrano-Martínez, Marcos E. Cruz-Vázquez, Carlos Ortega-Mora, Luis M. Álvarez-García, Gema Ganado Bovino Neospora caninum Anticuerpos Experimentación en Laboratorio Técnicas Inmunológicas Cattle Antibodies Laboratory Experimentation Immunological Techniques Ibero América We carried out an inter-laboratory trial to compare the serological tests commonly used for the detection of specific Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle in Ibero-American countries. A total of eight laboratories participated from the following countries: Argentina (n = 4), Brazil (n = 1), Peru (n = 1), Mexico (n = 1), and Spain (n = 1). A blind panel of well-characterized cattle sera (n = 143) and sera representative of the target population (n = 351) was tested by seven in-house indirect fluorescent antibody tests (IFATs 1–7) and three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs 1–3; two in-house and one commercial). Diagnostic performance of the serological tests was calculated and compared according to the following criteria: (1) the “Pre-test information,” which uses previous epidemiological and serological data; (2) the “Majority of tests,” which classifies a serum as positive or negative according to the results obtained by most tests evaluated. Unexpectedly, six tests showed either sensitivity (Se) or specificity (Sp) values lower than 90%. In contrast, the best tests in terms of Se, Sp, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were IFAT 1 and optimized ELISA 1 and ELISA 2. We evaluated a high number of IFATs, which are the most widely used tests in Ibero-America. The significant discordances observed among the tests regardless of the criteria employed hinder control programs and urge the use of a common test or with similar performances to either the optimized IFAT 1 and ELISAs 1 and 2. EEA Rafaela Fil: Campero, Lucía María. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Inmunoparasitología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Moreno-Gonzalo, Javier. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Animal. SALUVET; España Fil: Venturini, María C. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Inmunoparasitología; Argentina Fil: Moré, Gastón. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Inmunoparasitología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Dellarupe, Andrea. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Inmunoparasitología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Rambeaud, Magdalena. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Inmunoparasitología; Argentina Fil: Echaide, Ignacio Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina Fil: Valentini, Beatriz Susana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina Fil: Campero, Carlos Manuel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina Fil: Moore, Prando Dadin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina Fil: Cano, Dora Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina Fil: Fort, Marcelo Cristian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina Fil: Mota, Rinaldo A. Rural Federal University of Pernambuco. Veterinary Medicine Department; Brasil Fil: Serrano-Martínez, Marcos E. Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnica; Perú Fil: Cruz-Vázquez, Carlos. Instituto Técnico El Llano; México Fil: Ortega-Mora, Luis M. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Animal. SALUVET; España Fil: Álvarez-García, Gema. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Animal. SALUVET; España 2018-07-30T12:01:09Z 2018-07-30T12:01:09Z 2018-01 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11250-017-1401-x http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2908 0049-4747 1573-7438 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1401-x eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Tropical Animal Health and Production 50 (1) : 75–84 (January 2018)