Property Rights in a Very Poor Country: Tenure Insecurity and Investment in Ethiopia

This article provides evidence from one of the poorest countries in the world that the institutions of property rights matter for efficiency, investment, and growth. With all land state-owned, the threat of land redistribution never appears far off the agenda. Land rental and leasing have been made legal, but transfer rights remain restricted and the perception of continuing tenure insecurity remains quite strong. Using a unique panel data set, this study investigates whether transfer rights and implied tenure insecurity affect household investment decisions, focusing on trees and shrubs. The panel data estimates suggest that limited perceived transfer rights negatively affects the long-term investment in Ethiopian agriculture, contributing to the low returns from land and perpetuating low growth and poverty.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali, Daniel Ayalew, Dercon, Stefan, Gautam, Madhur
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:EN
Published: 2011
Subjects:Measurement and Analysis of Poverty I320, Property Law K110, Economic Development: Agriculture, Natural Resources, Energy, Environment, Other Primary Products O130, Formal and Informal Sectors, Shadow Economy, Institutional Arrangements O170, Land Ownership and Tenure, Land Reform, Land Use, Irrigation, Agriculture and Environment Q150, Agricultural Policy, Food Policy Q180,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5532
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!