Scaling Up Community-Driven Development : Theoretical Underpinnings and Program Design Implications

Community-driven development boasts many islands of success, but these have not scaled up to cover entire countries. Binswanger and Aiyar examine the possible obstacles to scaling up, and possible solutions. They consider the theoretical case for community-driven development and case studies of success in both sectoral and multisectoral programs. Obstacles to scaling up include high economic and fiscal costs, adverse institutional barriers, problems associated with the co-production of outputs by different actors on the basis of subsidiarity, lack of adaptation to the local context using field-tested manuals, and lack of scaling-up logistics. The authors consider ways of reducing economic and fiscal costs, overcoming hostile institutional barriers, overcoming problems of co-production, adapting to the local context with field testing, and providing scaling-up logistics. Detailed annexes and checklists provide a guide to program design, diagnostics, and tools.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Binswanger, Hans P., Aiyar, Swaminathan
Format: Policy Research Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2003-03
Subjects:ACCESS TO INFORMATION, ACCOUNTABILITY, AUDITS, AUTHORITY, BENEFICIARY PARTICIPATION, BUREAUCRAT, CAPACITY BUILDING, CENTRAL AGENCIES, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS, CITIZENS, COLLABORATION, COMMUNITIES, COMMUNITY CAPACITY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT, COMMUNITY HEALTH, COMMUNITY LEADERS, COMMUNITY MEMBERS, COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS, COMMUNITY WORKERS, COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT, COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, DECENTRALIZATION, DECISION MAKING, DECISION-MAKING, DISTRICTS, E-COMMERCE, E-GOVERNANCE, ELITES, ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, EXECUTION, EXPENDITURES, EXTENSION AGENTS, EXTERNALITIES, FACILITATORS, FEDERATIONS, FIELD TESTING, FINANCIAL RESOURCES, FINANCIAL VIABILITY, FISCAL, FISCAL CAPACITIES, FISCAL COSTS, FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION, FORESTS, GOOD GOVERNANCE, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, GRAMEEN BANK, HEALTH WORKERS, INCOME, INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS, INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS, INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, LEARNING, LOBBYING, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, LOCAL LEVEL INSTITUTIONS, LOCAL TAXES, MARGINALIZED GROUPS, MEDIA, MORTALITY, MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS, NATURAL RESOURCES, NEIGHBORHOODS, OVERHEAD COSTS, PA, PARTICIPATORY PROCESS, PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES, PARTICIPATORY WORKSHOPS, PASTURES, PHONES, PILOT PROJECTS, POLICY RESEARCH, POLITICIANS, PRIVATE SECTOR, PRODUCERS, PROGRAMS, PROPERTY RIGHTS, PROPERTY VALUES, PUBLIC SECTOR, RADIO, RECLAMATION, SOCIAL CAPITAL, SOCIAL FUNDS, SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT, T&V, TEACHERS, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, TECHNICAL NEEDS, TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS, TECHNOLOGICAL OPTIONS, TELEPHONES, TRADEOFFS, TRAINING MATERIALS, TRANSPARENCY, WATER SUPPLY, WATERSHED, WILLINGNESS TO PAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, PROGRAM DESIGN, STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION, COFINANCING, WILLINGNESS TO PAY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/03/2329631/scaling-up-community-driven-development-theoretical-underpinnings-program-design-implications
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18310
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!