On the Fungibility of Spending and Earnings : Evidence from Rural China and Tanzania

A common behavioral assumption of micro-economic theory is that income is fungible. Using household panel data from rural China and Tanzania, this study finds however that people are more likely to spend unearned income on less basic consumption goods such as alcohol and tobacco, non-staple food, transportation and communication, and clothing, while they are somewhat more likely to spend earned income on basic consumption goods such as staple food, and invest it in education. This resonates with the widespread cultural notion that money that is easily earned is also more easily spent. Cognitively, the results could be understood within the context of emotional accounting, whereby people classify income based on the emotions it evokes, prompting them to spend hard earned money more wisely to mitigate the negative connotations associated with its acquisition. The policy implications are real, bearing for example on the choice between employment guarantee schemes and cash transfers in designing social security programs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christiaensen, Luc, Pan, Lei
Format: Policy Research Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2012-12
Subjects:ACCOUNTING, AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES, AGRICULTURE, AID EFFECTIVENESS, ATTRITION, AVERAGE INCOME, BARGAINING, BORROWING, BUDGET CONSTRAINTS, CASH TRANSFERS, CONSUMER CHOICE, CONSUMERS, CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR, CONSUMPTION FUNCTION, CONSUMPTION SMOOTHING, COPING BEHAVIORS, COUPONS, CRISES, CROP INCOME, CROSS-SECTION DATA, DEBT, DECISION MAKING, DEPENDENT VARIABLE, DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, DEVELOPMENT POLICY, DROUGHT, EARNED INCOME, EARNINGS, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ECONOMIC REVIEW, ECONOMIC SHOCKS, ECONOMIC THEORY, EMPIRICAL APPLICATION, EMPIRICAL FINDINGS, EMPLOYMENT, EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEMES, EXPLANATORY POWER, FARM ACTIVITIES, FARM INCOME, FEMALE LABOR, FINANCIAL SECTOR, FOOD CONSUMPTION, FOOD EXPENDITURES, FUNGIBILITY, GAME THEORY, GIFT GIVING, HOUSEHOLD BUDGET, HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, HOUSEHOLD HEAD, HOUSEHOLD HEAD AGE, HOUSEHOLD INCOME, HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS, HOUSEHOLD SIZE, HOUSEHOLD VULNERABILITY, INCOME, INCOME DATA, INCOME GAINS, INCOME GROUPS, INCOME LEVELS, INCOME SHARE, INCOME SOURCE, INCOME SOURCES, INCOME TRANSFERS, INCOMES, INSURANCE, LABOUR, LIQUIDITY, LOW INCOME, MARGINAL PROPENSITY TO CONSUME, MEASUREMENT ERROR, NONFARM INCOME, NUTRITION, OPTIMIZATION, PERMANENT INCOME, PERMANENT INCOME HYPOTHESIS, POLICY DISCUSSIONS, POLICY IMPLICATIONS, POLICY INTERVENTIONS, POLICY RESEARCH, POLITICAL ECONOMY, POOR, POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, POVERTY ANALYSIS, POVERTY REDUCTION, POVERTY REDUCTION PROJECT, PUBLIC ECONOMICS, PUBLIC POLICY, RECIPROCITY, REGRESSION TECHNIQUES, RELATIVE PRICES, RESOURCE ALLOCATION, RURAL, RURAL HOUSEHOLDS, RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE, RURAL SETTINGS, SAFETY NETS, SAVINGS, SCHOOL FEEDING, SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL, SOCIAL SAFETY, SOCIAL SAFETY NETS, SOCIAL SECURITY, SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, TARGETING, TAXATION, UTILITY FUNCTION, WEALTH,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/12/17123932/fungibility-spending-earnings-evidence-rural-china-tanzania
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12208
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!