High migration rates shape the postglacial history of amphi-Atlantic bryophytes
Paleontological evidence and current patterns of angiosperm species richness suggest that European biota experienced more severe bottlenecks than North American ones during the last glacial maximum. How well this pattern fits other plant species is less clear. Bryophytes offer a unique opportunity to contrast the impact of the last glacial maximum in North America and Europe because about 60% of the European bryoflora is shared with North America. Here, we use population genetic analyses based on approximate Bayesian computation on eight amphi‐Atlantic species to test the hypothesis that North American populations were less impacted by the last glacial maximum, exhibiting higher levels of genetic diversity than European ones and ultimately serving as a refugium for the postglacial recolonization of Europe. In contrast with this hypothesis, the best‐fit demographic model involved similar patterns of population size contractions, comparable levels of genetic diversity and balanced migration rates between European and North American populations. Our results thus suggest that bryophytes have experienced comparable demographic glacial histories on both sides of the Atlantic. Although a weak, but significant genetic structure was systematically recovered between European and North American populations, evidence for migration from and towards both continents suggests that amphi‐Atlantic bryophyte population may function as a metapopulation network. Reconstructing the biogeographic history of either North American or European bryophyte populations therefore requires a large, trans‐Atlantic geographic framework.
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Autres auteurs: | |
| Format: | artículo biblioteca |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2016-11
|
| Sujets: | Refugium, Postglacial recolonization, Glacial cycle, Dispersal, Approximate Bayesian computation, Bryophytes, |
| Accès en ligne: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/183887 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007698 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|