Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation

The Emissions Gap Report 2013 from the United Nations Environment Programme restates the claim that changing to no-till practices in agriculture, as an alternative to conventional tillage, causes an accumulation of organic carbon in soil, thus mitigating climate change through carbon sequestration. But these claims ignore a large body of experimental evidence showing that the quantity of additional organic carbon in soil under no-till is relatively small: in large part apparent increases result from an altered depth distribution. The larger concentration near the surface in no-till is generally beneficial for soil properties that often, though not always, translate into improved crop growth. In many regions where no-till is practised it is common for soil to be cultivated conventionally every few years for a range of agronomic reasons, so any soil carbon benefit is then lost. We argue that no-till is beneficial for soil quality and adaptation of agriculture to climate change, but its role in mitigation is widely overstated.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Powlson, David S., Stirling, Clare M., Jat, Mangi Lal, Gerard, Bruno G., Palm, Cheryl A., Sánchez, P.A., Cassman, Kenneth G.
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Springer 2014-08
Subjects:climate, agriculture, tillage, carbon sequestration,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/41932
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2292
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!