Vegetation heterogeneity of natural grasslands on the basaltic region of Uruguay

We described vegetation heterogeneity and its relationship with environmental variables over an area of the basaltic region of central and north-western Uruguay dominated by shallow soils. Natural grasslands under continuous grazing by cattle and sheep are the predominant vegetation type (90%) of this geomorphologic region that comprises approximately 1.5 millions hectares. Vegetation data were obtained using the relevé method. Stands were sampled preferentially to represent all the perceptible physiognomic vegetation types. In quadrats of 10 x 10 m, located in the centre of each stand, floristic composition and structural characteristics of vegetation were recorded. Each species was visually assigned to a cover – abundance class following the scale proposed by Braun-Blanquet. Additionally, for each stand, we measured environmental variables (soil depth, top 10 cm of soil texture, slope, percent cover of rock and pebble, macro and micro topographical characteristics and livestock faecal abundance). Normalized Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI), a surrogate for net primary production, was derived from Landsat TM images. The species by relevés matrix with presence/absence data was subjected to multivariate analysis to reveal vegetation patterns. Agglomerative classification, based on Ward ́s method and Jaccard’s distance, was used to identify main groups in species relevés and the hierarchical relationships among them. The optimal levels of clustering and the indicator species for each cluster were determined by indicator species analysis. Correspondence analysis was carried out to describe floristic gradients. Relationships between ordination axes and environmental variables were explored by correlation analysis. Two hundred seventy four vascular plant species, representing 43 families, were encountered in 46 relevés. The families with the highest number of species were Poaceae (78) and Asteraceae (44). The best represented genera were: Stipa (8), Paspalum (7), and Aristida (7). A structure of six communities grouped in three main vegetation units emerged from this procedure: Meso–xerophytic grasslands, Litophytic steppes and Meso–hidrophytic grasslands. The main vegetation units showed different physiognomies and occurred on sites with different combinations of topography and soil properties. Meso–xerophytic grasslands showed predominantly a two layer structure with high-to-mid plant cover. The upper layer was dominated by grasses and sub-shrubs and the lower layer by forbs and grasses. This unit occurred mainly on shallow soils on steep and gentle slopes and convex interfluves of hills. Litophytic steppes showed one open layer dominated by Selaginella sellowii Hieron, a small pteridophyte. This unit was associated to flat erosion surfaces at high and middle topographical positions. The Meso–hidrophytic grasslands unit was a closed vegetation type, with two layers dominated by grasses and graminoids. This unit occurred predominantly on deep soils on gentle low slopes, valleys and plains. The first ordination axis explained a 62.7% of the variance and detected a water availability gradient going from Meso–hidrophytic grasslands to Litophytic steppes and Meso–xerophytic grasslands. The environmental controls of this water gradient were soil depth, texture, slope and microtopography. The position of the relevés along the main floristic gradient was strongly correlated to NDVI (p < 0.05).The second axis explained a 20.3% of the variation, and separated Litophytic steppes from Meso–xerophytic and Meso-hidrophytic grasslands. The present study provides information that could be useful for the design of grassland management practices and selection of conservation areas.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lezama, Felipe, Altesor, Alice, León, Rolando J., Paruelo, José M.
Format: Digital revista
Language:spa
Published: Asociación Argentina de Ecología 2006
Online Access:https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1441
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id rev-ecoaus-article-1441
record_format ojs
institution AUSTRAL
collection OJS
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-ecoaus
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname Asociación Argentina de Ecología
language spa
format Digital
author Lezama, Felipe
Altesor, Alice
León, Rolando J.
Paruelo, José M.
spellingShingle Lezama, Felipe
Altesor, Alice
León, Rolando J.
Paruelo, José M.
Vegetation heterogeneity of natural grasslands on the basaltic region of Uruguay
author_facet Lezama, Felipe
Altesor, Alice
León, Rolando J.
Paruelo, José M.
author_sort Lezama, Felipe
title Vegetation heterogeneity of natural grasslands on the basaltic region of Uruguay
title_short Vegetation heterogeneity of natural grasslands on the basaltic region of Uruguay
title_full Vegetation heterogeneity of natural grasslands on the basaltic region of Uruguay
title_fullStr Vegetation heterogeneity of natural grasslands on the basaltic region of Uruguay
title_full_unstemmed Vegetation heterogeneity of natural grasslands on the basaltic region of Uruguay
title_sort vegetation heterogeneity of natural grasslands on the basaltic region of uruguay
description We described vegetation heterogeneity and its relationship with environmental variables over an area of the basaltic region of central and north-western Uruguay dominated by shallow soils. Natural grasslands under continuous grazing by cattle and sheep are the predominant vegetation type (90%) of this geomorphologic region that comprises approximately 1.5 millions hectares. Vegetation data were obtained using the relevé method. Stands were sampled preferentially to represent all the perceptible physiognomic vegetation types. In quadrats of 10 x 10 m, located in the centre of each stand, floristic composition and structural characteristics of vegetation were recorded. Each species was visually assigned to a cover – abundance class following the scale proposed by Braun-Blanquet. Additionally, for each stand, we measured environmental variables (soil depth, top 10 cm of soil texture, slope, percent cover of rock and pebble, macro and micro topographical characteristics and livestock faecal abundance). Normalized Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI), a surrogate for net primary production, was derived from Landsat TM images. The species by relevés matrix with presence/absence data was subjected to multivariate analysis to reveal vegetation patterns. Agglomerative classification, based on Ward ́s method and Jaccard’s distance, was used to identify main groups in species relevés and the hierarchical relationships among them. The optimal levels of clustering and the indicator species for each cluster were determined by indicator species analysis. Correspondence analysis was carried out to describe floristic gradients. Relationships between ordination axes and environmental variables were explored by correlation analysis. Two hundred seventy four vascular plant species, representing 43 families, were encountered in 46 relevés. The families with the highest number of species were Poaceae (78) and Asteraceae (44). The best represented genera were: Stipa (8), Paspalum (7), and Aristida (7). A structure of six communities grouped in three main vegetation units emerged from this procedure: Meso–xerophytic grasslands, Litophytic steppes and Meso–hidrophytic grasslands. The main vegetation units showed different physiognomies and occurred on sites with different combinations of topography and soil properties. Meso–xerophytic grasslands showed predominantly a two layer structure with high-to-mid plant cover. The upper layer was dominated by grasses and sub-shrubs and the lower layer by forbs and grasses. This unit occurred mainly on shallow soils on steep and gentle slopes and convex interfluves of hills. Litophytic steppes showed one open layer dominated by Selaginella sellowii Hieron, a small pteridophyte. This unit was associated to flat erosion surfaces at high and middle topographical positions. The Meso–hidrophytic grasslands unit was a closed vegetation type, with two layers dominated by grasses and graminoids. This unit occurred predominantly on deep soils on gentle low slopes, valleys and plains. The first ordination axis explained a 62.7% of the variance and detected a water availability gradient going from Meso–hidrophytic grasslands to Litophytic steppes and Meso–xerophytic grasslands. The environmental controls of this water gradient were soil depth, texture, slope and microtopography. The position of the relevés along the main floristic gradient was strongly correlated to NDVI (p < 0.05).The second axis explained a 20.3% of the variation, and separated Litophytic steppes from Meso–xerophytic and Meso-hidrophytic grasslands. The present study provides information that could be useful for the design of grassland management practices and selection of conservation areas.
publisher Asociación Argentina de Ecología
publishDate 2006
url https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1441
work_keys_str_mv AT lezamafelipe vegetationheterogeneityofnaturalgrasslandsonthebasalticregionofuruguay
AT altesoralice vegetationheterogeneityofnaturalgrasslandsonthebasalticregionofuruguay
AT leonrolandoj vegetationheterogeneityofnaturalgrasslandsonthebasalticregionofuruguay
AT paruelojosem vegetationheterogeneityofnaturalgrasslandsonthebasalticregionofuruguay
AT lezamafelipe heterogeneidaddelavegetacionenpastizalesnaturalesdelaregionbasalticadeuruguay
AT altesoralice heterogeneidaddelavegetacionenpastizalesnaturalesdelaregionbasalticadeuruguay
AT leonrolandoj heterogeneidaddelavegetacionenpastizalesnaturalesdelaregionbasalticadeuruguay
AT paruelojosem heterogeneidaddelavegetacionenpastizalesnaturalesdelaregionbasalticadeuruguay
_version_ 1755912490195091456
spelling rev-ecoaus-article-14412020-11-11T22:43:39Z Vegetation heterogeneity of natural grasslands on the basaltic region of Uruguay Heterogeneidad de la vegetación en pastizales naturales de la región basáltica de Uruguay Lezama, Felipe Altesor, Alice León, Rolando J. Paruelo, José M. phytosociology communities remote sensing plant functional types water availability fitosociología comunidades sensores remotos tipos funcionales de plantas disponibilidad de agua We described vegetation heterogeneity and its relationship with environmental variables over an area of the basaltic region of central and north-western Uruguay dominated by shallow soils. Natural grasslands under continuous grazing by cattle and sheep are the predominant vegetation type (90%) of this geomorphologic region that comprises approximately 1.5 millions hectares. Vegetation data were obtained using the relevé method. Stands were sampled preferentially to represent all the perceptible physiognomic vegetation types. In quadrats of 10 x 10 m, located in the centre of each stand, floristic composition and structural characteristics of vegetation were recorded. Each species was visually assigned to a cover – abundance class following the scale proposed by Braun-Blanquet. Additionally, for each stand, we measured environmental variables (soil depth, top 10 cm of soil texture, slope, percent cover of rock and pebble, macro and micro topographical characteristics and livestock faecal abundance). Normalized Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI), a surrogate for net primary production, was derived from Landsat TM images. The species by relevés matrix with presence/absence data was subjected to multivariate analysis to reveal vegetation patterns. Agglomerative classification, based on Ward ́s method and Jaccard’s distance, was used to identify main groups in species relevés and the hierarchical relationships among them. The optimal levels of clustering and the indicator species for each cluster were determined by indicator species analysis. Correspondence analysis was carried out to describe floristic gradients. Relationships between ordination axes and environmental variables were explored by correlation analysis. Two hundred seventy four vascular plant species, representing 43 families, were encountered in 46 relevés. The families with the highest number of species were Poaceae (78) and Asteraceae (44). The best represented genera were: Stipa (8), Paspalum (7), and Aristida (7). A structure of six communities grouped in three main vegetation units emerged from this procedure: Meso–xerophytic grasslands, Litophytic steppes and Meso–hidrophytic grasslands. The main vegetation units showed different physiognomies and occurred on sites with different combinations of topography and soil properties. Meso–xerophytic grasslands showed predominantly a two layer structure with high-to-mid plant cover. The upper layer was dominated by grasses and sub-shrubs and the lower layer by forbs and grasses. This unit occurred mainly on shallow soils on steep and gentle slopes and convex interfluves of hills. Litophytic steppes showed one open layer dominated by Selaginella sellowii Hieron, a small pteridophyte. This unit was associated to flat erosion surfaces at high and middle topographical positions. The Meso–hidrophytic grasslands unit was a closed vegetation type, with two layers dominated by grasses and graminoids. This unit occurred predominantly on deep soils on gentle low slopes, valleys and plains. The first ordination axis explained a 62.7% of the variance and detected a water availability gradient going from Meso–hidrophytic grasslands to Litophytic steppes and Meso–xerophytic grasslands. The environmental controls of this water gradient were soil depth, texture, slope and microtopography. The position of the relevés along the main floristic gradient was strongly correlated to NDVI (p < 0.05).The second axis explained a 20.3% of the variation, and separated Litophytic steppes from Meso–xerophytic and Meso-hidrophytic grasslands. The present study provides information that could be useful for the design of grassland management practices and selection of conservation areas. En este trabajo se describe la heterogeneidad de la vegetación herbácea y su relación con factores ambientales en una extensa región de origen basáltico dominada por pastizales naturales ubicada en el centro y noroeste del Uruguay (aproximadamente 1.5 millones de hectáreas). Usando el método fitosociológico se registró en cada stand relevado la composición florística y un conjunto de variables ambientales (profundidad del suelo, textura de los primeros 10 cm de suelo, pendiente, rocosidad, pedregosidad, características macro y microtopográficas y abundancia de fecas de ganado). A partir de imágenes Landsat TM se calculó el Índice Verde Normalizado (IVN), un estimador de la productividad primaria, para cada uno de los censos. La matriz de especies por censos con datos de presencia ausencia fue analizada a través de técnicas multivariadas. Se llevaron a cabo análisis de clasificación aglomerativos para identificar agrupamientos de censos y las relaciones jerárquicas entre ellos. Se utilizó análisis de correspondencia para identificar los gradientes principales de vegetación. Las relaciones entre los ejes del ordenamiento y las variables ambientales fueron exploradas a través de análisis de correlación. La clasificación numérica de 46 censos florísticos permitió reconocer una estructura de seis comunidades agrupadas en tres unidades principales de vegetación: Pastizales de Meso- xerófitas, Estepas de Litófitas y Pastizales de Meso-hidrófitas. El primer eje del ordenamiento, que explicó el 62.7% de la varianza, estuvo relacionado con un gradiente de disponibilidad de agua, determinado por la profundidad del suelo, textura, pendiente y forma de la pendiente. El segundo gradiente florístico, que da cuenta del 20.3% de la variación, discriminó a la comunidad de litófitas característica de superficies planas de erosión de las comunidades restantes. La identidad florística de los censos presentó una fuerte correlación con el IVN (p < 0.05). La información que provee este estudio puede constituir un valioso auxiliar en el diseño de sistemas ganaderos y en la evaluación y selección de sitios para la conservación. Asociación Argentina de Ecología 2006-12-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículos application/pdf https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1441 Ecología Austral; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2006); 167-182 Ecología Austral; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2006); 167-182 0327-5477 1667-7838 spa https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1441/802 Derechos de autor 2020 Ecología Austral