Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation

Introducción: The existence of a “Deuteronomistic History,” consisting of the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings, is under review.1 Is this scholarly construct an accurate understanding of what ancient writers of the Hebrew Bible conceived to be a coherent sequence of books that should be read together? Did the books ever form an independent collection, without Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers prefixed, or without Genesis- Numbers prefixed? If we are not as certain as past generations that they ever formed a recognized literary unit,2 why ask what was deemed authoritative about these five books in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods, by which time it is generally agreed they existed close to their current final forms? The purpose of the present volume is not to focus on the important debate about the status of the so-called Deuteronomistic History, though the results might contribute toward framing arguments on one side or the other. Instead, it is to try to understand the element of authority in relation to each book, which can be construed in two different ways. On the one hand, it can lead us to ask why we have each of the five individual books and what concerns led to their creation using which older materials to address those issues, because these earlier traditions carried some weight of authority for the community of scribes who penned the narratives as well as for their implied target audience(s). Currently, the dates of composition for the various books are generally assigned to the late monarchic period, the Neo-Babylonian period, or the early Persian period. In all three cases, a second question naturally arises then that needs a reasoned response: once created, why would the concerns addressed have had ongoing relevance and resonance for audiences in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edelman, Diana V., Levin, Christoph, Knauf, E. Axel, Amit, Yairah, Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne, Bolin, Thomas M., Adam, Klaus Peter, Römer, Thomas, Linville, James R.
Other Authors: Edelman, Diana V., (ed.)
Format: Libro biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Society of Biblical Literature 2014
Subjects:LIBROS SAGRADOS, Biblia. A.T., ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO, HELENISMO, PERSAS, AUTORIDAD, Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio, Biblia. A.T. Josué, Biblia. A.T. Samuel, Biblia. A.T. Jueces, Biblia. A.T. Reyes,
Online Access:https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/8008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ucacris:123456789-8008
record_format koha
spelling oai:ucacris:123456789-80082021-04-16T18:06:11Z Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation Edelman, Diana V. Levin, Christoph Knauf, E. Axel Amit, Yairah Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne Bolin, Thomas M. Adam, Klaus Peter Römer, Thomas Linville, James R. Edelman, Diana V., (ed.) LIBROS SAGRADOS Biblia. A.T. ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO HELENISMO PERSAS AUTORIDAD Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio Biblia. A.T. Josué Biblia. A.T. Samuel Biblia. A.T. Jueces Biblia. A.T. Reyes Introducción: The existence of a “Deuteronomistic History,” consisting of the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings, is under review.1 Is this scholarly construct an accurate understanding of what ancient writers of the Hebrew Bible conceived to be a coherent sequence of books that should be read together? Did the books ever form an independent collection, without Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers prefixed, or without Genesis- Numbers prefixed? If we are not as certain as past generations that they ever formed a recognized literary unit,2 why ask what was deemed authoritative about these five books in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods, by which time it is generally agreed they existed close to their current final forms? The purpose of the present volume is not to focus on the important debate about the status of the so-called Deuteronomistic History, though the results might contribute toward framing arguments on one side or the other. Instead, it is to try to understand the element of authority in relation to each book, which can be construed in two different ways. On the one hand, it can lead us to ask why we have each of the five individual books and what concerns led to their creation using which older materials to address those issues, because these earlier traditions carried some weight of authority for the community of scribes who penned the narratives as well as for their implied target audience(s). Currently, the dates of composition for the various books are generally assigned to the late monarchic period, the Neo-Babylonian period, or the early Persian period. In all three cases, a second question naturally arises then that needs a reasoned response: once created, why would the concerns addressed have had ongoing relevance and resonance for audiences in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods? 2019-06-21T23:44:22Z 2019-06-21T23:44:22Z 2014 Libro Edelman, D.V. (ed.). Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation [en línea]. Atlanta; Buenos Aires: Society of Biblical Literature; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente, 2014. Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/8008 978-1-58983-739-3 https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/8008 eng Acceso Abierto https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Society of Biblical Literature Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia de Antiguo Oriente Edelman, D.V. (ed.). Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation. Atlanta; Buenos Aires: Society of Biblical Literature; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente, 2014 Ancient Near East Monographs - Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente. 2014, 6
institution UCA
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-uca
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de la UCA
language eng
topic LIBROS SAGRADOS
Biblia. A.T.
ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO
HELENISMO
PERSAS
AUTORIDAD
Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio
Biblia. A.T. Josué
Biblia. A.T. Samuel
Biblia. A.T. Jueces
Biblia. A.T. Reyes
LIBROS SAGRADOS
Biblia. A.T.
ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO
HELENISMO
PERSAS
AUTORIDAD
Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio
Biblia. A.T. Josué
Biblia. A.T. Samuel
Biblia. A.T. Jueces
Biblia. A.T. Reyes
spellingShingle LIBROS SAGRADOS
Biblia. A.T.
ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO
HELENISMO
PERSAS
AUTORIDAD
Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio
Biblia. A.T. Josué
Biblia. A.T. Samuel
Biblia. A.T. Jueces
Biblia. A.T. Reyes
LIBROS SAGRADOS
Biblia. A.T.
ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO
HELENISMO
PERSAS
AUTORIDAD
Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio
Biblia. A.T. Josué
Biblia. A.T. Samuel
Biblia. A.T. Jueces
Biblia. A.T. Reyes
Edelman, Diana V.
Levin, Christoph
Knauf, E. Axel
Amit, Yairah
Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne
Bolin, Thomas M.
Adam, Klaus Peter
Römer, Thomas
Linville, James R.
Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation
description Introducción: The existence of a “Deuteronomistic History,” consisting of the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings, is under review.1 Is this scholarly construct an accurate understanding of what ancient writers of the Hebrew Bible conceived to be a coherent sequence of books that should be read together? Did the books ever form an independent collection, without Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers prefixed, or without Genesis- Numbers prefixed? If we are not as certain as past generations that they ever formed a recognized literary unit,2 why ask what was deemed authoritative about these five books in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods, by which time it is generally agreed they existed close to their current final forms? The purpose of the present volume is not to focus on the important debate about the status of the so-called Deuteronomistic History, though the results might contribute toward framing arguments on one side or the other. Instead, it is to try to understand the element of authority in relation to each book, which can be construed in two different ways. On the one hand, it can lead us to ask why we have each of the five individual books and what concerns led to their creation using which older materials to address those issues, because these earlier traditions carried some weight of authority for the community of scribes who penned the narratives as well as for their implied target audience(s). Currently, the dates of composition for the various books are generally assigned to the late monarchic period, the Neo-Babylonian period, or the early Persian period. In all three cases, a second question naturally arises then that needs a reasoned response: once created, why would the concerns addressed have had ongoing relevance and resonance for audiences in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods?
author2 Edelman, Diana V., (ed.)
author_facet Edelman, Diana V., (ed.)
Edelman, Diana V.
Levin, Christoph
Knauf, E. Axel
Amit, Yairah
Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne
Bolin, Thomas M.
Adam, Klaus Peter
Römer, Thomas
Linville, James R.
format Libro
topic_facet LIBROS SAGRADOS
Biblia. A.T.
ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO
HELENISMO
PERSAS
AUTORIDAD
Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio
Biblia. A.T. Josué
Biblia. A.T. Samuel
Biblia. A.T. Jueces
Biblia. A.T. Reyes
author Edelman, Diana V.
Levin, Christoph
Knauf, E. Axel
Amit, Yairah
Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne
Bolin, Thomas M.
Adam, Klaus Peter
Römer, Thomas
Linville, James R.
author_sort Edelman, Diana V.
title Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation
title_short Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation
title_full Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation
title_fullStr Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation
title_full_unstemmed Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation
title_sort deuteronomy-kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation
publisher Society of Biblical Literature
publishDate 2014
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/8008
work_keys_str_mv AT edelmandianav deuteronomykingsasemergingauthoritativebooksaconversation
AT levinchristoph deuteronomykingsasemergingauthoritativebooksaconversation
AT knaufeaxel deuteronomykingsasemergingauthoritativebooksaconversation
AT amityairah deuteronomykingsasemergingauthoritativebooksaconversation
AT gillmayrbuchersusanne deuteronomykingsasemergingauthoritativebooksaconversation
AT bolinthomasm deuteronomykingsasemergingauthoritativebooksaconversation
AT adamklauspeter deuteronomykingsasemergingauthoritativebooksaconversation
AT romerthomas deuteronomykingsasemergingauthoritativebooksaconversation
AT linvillejamesr deuteronomykingsasemergingauthoritativebooksaconversation
_version_ 1756275765900476416