Common law, civil law, and the challenge from federalism

Let me start with some personal anecdotes regarding the life of he who was rightly termed “the great Litvinoff.”1 Borrowing again from the same source, I shall call them “Litvinovian observations.”2 To each observation I shall assign a label; each will attempt to illustrate some trait of his intriguing personality. The first one I shall name, not without a certain boldness, “Litvinovian Intransigence.”3 From the outset I must clarify that I am talking about intransigence in certain matters only—minor matters it would seem, matters of detail. I shall illustrate Litvinovian Intransigence with two one-on-one experiences. My first encounter with Saúl Litvinoff occurred at a time when he and other LSU faculty were visiting Argentina. Roberto Bosca, then Dean of Universidad Austral Law School, had asked if I could take don Saúl and him as my guests to the Jockey Club in Buenos Aires. The three of us were to have dinner. But at the lobby of the Club, don Saúl was kindly requested to wear a blue jacket in place of the extremely elegant beige jacket that he was wearing. I had completely forgotten to forewarn my guest that light colors are not admitted at night in this traditional venue. This omission would not have been a problem since the Club has extra blue jackets intended precisely for these situations. That is, it would not have been a problem had it not been for Litvinovian Intransigence. Saúl refused to take the old, worn out, rather dirty jacket he was offered by the bewildered janitor. He would not remove his own beautiful garment, even if that entailed leaving the Jockey Club and, as it turned out, dining at a much less elegant restaurant: a last minute, improvised choice. For don Saúl, the only thing that really mattered was that his own elegance had been preserved...

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Legarre, Santiago
Format: Artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Center of civil law studies 2010
Subjects:DERECHO CONSUETUDINARIO, DERECHO CIVIL, FEDERALISMO, COMMON LAW,
Online Access:https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/10398
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ucacris:123456789-10398
record_format koha
spelling oai:ucacris:123456789-103982020-07-22T13:55:46Z Common law, civil law, and the challenge from federalism Legarre, Santiago DERECHO CONSUETUDINARIO DERECHO CIVIL FEDERALISMO COMMON LAW Let me start with some personal anecdotes regarding the life of he who was rightly termed “the great Litvinoff.”1 Borrowing again from the same source, I shall call them “Litvinovian observations.”2 To each observation I shall assign a label; each will attempt to illustrate some trait of his intriguing personality. The first one I shall name, not without a certain boldness, “Litvinovian Intransigence.”3 From the outset I must clarify that I am talking about intransigence in certain matters only—minor matters it would seem, matters of detail. I shall illustrate Litvinovian Intransigence with two one-on-one experiences. My first encounter with Saúl Litvinoff occurred at a time when he and other LSU faculty were visiting Argentina. Roberto Bosca, then Dean of Universidad Austral Law School, had asked if I could take don Saúl and him as my guests to the Jockey Club in Buenos Aires. The three of us were to have dinner. But at the lobby of the Club, don Saúl was kindly requested to wear a blue jacket in place of the extremely elegant beige jacket that he was wearing. I had completely forgotten to forewarn my guest that light colors are not admitted at night in this traditional venue. This omission would not have been a problem since the Club has extra blue jackets intended precisely for these situations. That is, it would not have been a problem had it not been for Litvinovian Intransigence. Saúl refused to take the old, worn out, rather dirty jacket he was offered by the bewildered janitor. He would not remove his own beautiful garment, even if that entailed leaving the Jockey Club and, as it turned out, dining at a much less elegant restaurant: a last minute, improvised choice. For don Saúl, the only thing that really mattered was that his own elegance had been preserved... 2020-07-21T18:04:16Z 2020-07-21T18:04:16Z 2010 Artículo Legarre, S. Common Law, Civil Law, and the Challenge from Federalism [en lìnea]. Journal of Civil Law Studies. 2010, 3. Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/10398 https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/10398 eng Acceso abierto http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Center of civil law studies Journal of Civil Law Studies Vol.3, 2010
institution UCA
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-uca
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de la UCA
language eng
topic DERECHO CONSUETUDINARIO
DERECHO CIVIL
FEDERALISMO
COMMON LAW
DERECHO CONSUETUDINARIO
DERECHO CIVIL
FEDERALISMO
COMMON LAW
spellingShingle DERECHO CONSUETUDINARIO
DERECHO CIVIL
FEDERALISMO
COMMON LAW
DERECHO CONSUETUDINARIO
DERECHO CIVIL
FEDERALISMO
COMMON LAW
Legarre, Santiago
Common law, civil law, and the challenge from federalism
description Let me start with some personal anecdotes regarding the life of he who was rightly termed “the great Litvinoff.”1 Borrowing again from the same source, I shall call them “Litvinovian observations.”2 To each observation I shall assign a label; each will attempt to illustrate some trait of his intriguing personality. The first one I shall name, not without a certain boldness, “Litvinovian Intransigence.”3 From the outset I must clarify that I am talking about intransigence in certain matters only—minor matters it would seem, matters of detail. I shall illustrate Litvinovian Intransigence with two one-on-one experiences. My first encounter with Saúl Litvinoff occurred at a time when he and other LSU faculty were visiting Argentina. Roberto Bosca, then Dean of Universidad Austral Law School, had asked if I could take don Saúl and him as my guests to the Jockey Club in Buenos Aires. The three of us were to have dinner. But at the lobby of the Club, don Saúl was kindly requested to wear a blue jacket in place of the extremely elegant beige jacket that he was wearing. I had completely forgotten to forewarn my guest that light colors are not admitted at night in this traditional venue. This omission would not have been a problem since the Club has extra blue jackets intended precisely for these situations. That is, it would not have been a problem had it not been for Litvinovian Intransigence. Saúl refused to take the old, worn out, rather dirty jacket he was offered by the bewildered janitor. He would not remove his own beautiful garment, even if that entailed leaving the Jockey Club and, as it turned out, dining at a much less elegant restaurant: a last minute, improvised choice. For don Saúl, the only thing that really mattered was that his own elegance had been preserved...
format Artículo
topic_facet DERECHO CONSUETUDINARIO
DERECHO CIVIL
FEDERALISMO
COMMON LAW
author Legarre, Santiago
author_facet Legarre, Santiago
author_sort Legarre, Santiago
title Common law, civil law, and the challenge from federalism
title_short Common law, civil law, and the challenge from federalism
title_full Common law, civil law, and the challenge from federalism
title_fullStr Common law, civil law, and the challenge from federalism
title_full_unstemmed Common law, civil law, and the challenge from federalism
title_sort common law, civil law, and the challenge from federalism
publisher Center of civil law studies
publishDate 2010
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/10398
work_keys_str_mv AT legarresantiago commonlawcivillawandthechallengefromfederalism
_version_ 1756276052424916992