Efficacy, safety and tolerability of using abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

The objective is to provide an update on the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of the use of abatacept for treating rheumatoid arthritis. A systematic review (up to June 2011) followed by meta-analyses was performed. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing abatacept at a dose of 10 mg/kg with a placebo, both with concomitant methotrexate, were used. Only high- or moderate-quality studies were included. The efficacy was evaluated based on changes in the ACR, DAS and HAQ; safety was assessed based on serious adverse events, serious infections, malignancies and deaths; tolerability was evaluated based on the withdrawals due to adverse events, serious adverse events and lack of efficacy. All these parameters were evaluated within one year of treatment. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4,219 patients. For all of the efficacy parameters, the abatacept group had better results than the placebo group, except in the case of HAQ improvement >0.3, which presented no statistically significant difference. None of the safety parameters presented a significant difference between the groups. The tolerability parameters were also similar between groups, with the exception of withdrawals due to lack of efficacy. For this criterion, the abatacept group presented favorably compared to the control group. Abatacept showed a higher efficacy compared to placebo without significant differences between the abatacept and control group in terms of safety.

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venson,Rafael, Wiens,Astrid, Correr,Cassyano Januário, Pontarolo,Roberto
Formato: Digital revista
Idioma:English
Publicado: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas 2012
Acceso en línea:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-82502012000400022
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S1984-82502012000400022
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1984-825020120004000222013-02-14Efficacy, safety and tolerability of using abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritisVenson,RafaelWiens,AstridCorrer,Cassyano JanuárioPontarolo,Roberto Abatacept/efficacy Rheumatoid arthritis/treatment Meta-analyses The objective is to provide an update on the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of the use of abatacept for treating rheumatoid arthritis. A systematic review (up to June 2011) followed by meta-analyses was performed. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing abatacept at a dose of 10 mg/kg with a placebo, both with concomitant methotrexate, were used. Only high- or moderate-quality studies were included. The efficacy was evaluated based on changes in the ACR, DAS and HAQ; safety was assessed based on serious adverse events, serious infections, malignancies and deaths; tolerability was evaluated based on the withdrawals due to adverse events, serious adverse events and lack of efficacy. All these parameters were evaluated within one year of treatment. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4,219 patients. For all of the efficacy parameters, the abatacept group had better results than the placebo group, except in the case of HAQ improvement >0.3, which presented no statistically significant difference. None of the safety parameters presented a significant difference between the groups. The tolerability parameters were also similar between groups, with the exception of withdrawals due to lack of efficacy. For this criterion, the abatacept group presented favorably compared to the control group. Abatacept showed a higher efficacy compared to placebo without significant differences between the abatacept and control group in terms of safety.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Ciências FarmacêuticasBrazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences v.48 n.4 20122012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-82502012000400022en10.1590/S1984-82502012000400022
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Venson,Rafael
Wiens,Astrid
Correr,Cassyano Januário
Pontarolo,Roberto
spellingShingle Venson,Rafael
Wiens,Astrid
Correr,Cassyano Januário
Pontarolo,Roberto
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of using abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
author_facet Venson,Rafael
Wiens,Astrid
Correr,Cassyano Januário
Pontarolo,Roberto
author_sort Venson,Rafael
title Efficacy, safety and tolerability of using abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Efficacy, safety and tolerability of using abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Efficacy, safety and tolerability of using abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Efficacy, safety and tolerability of using abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy, safety and tolerability of using abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort efficacy, safety and tolerability of using abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
description The objective is to provide an update on the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of the use of abatacept for treating rheumatoid arthritis. A systematic review (up to June 2011) followed by meta-analyses was performed. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing abatacept at a dose of 10 mg/kg with a placebo, both with concomitant methotrexate, were used. Only high- or moderate-quality studies were included. The efficacy was evaluated based on changes in the ACR, DAS and HAQ; safety was assessed based on serious adverse events, serious infections, malignancies and deaths; tolerability was evaluated based on the withdrawals due to adverse events, serious adverse events and lack of efficacy. All these parameters were evaluated within one year of treatment. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4,219 patients. For all of the efficacy parameters, the abatacept group had better results than the placebo group, except in the case of HAQ improvement >0.3, which presented no statistically significant difference. None of the safety parameters presented a significant difference between the groups. The tolerability parameters were also similar between groups, with the exception of withdrawals due to lack of efficacy. For this criterion, the abatacept group presented favorably compared to the control group. Abatacept showed a higher efficacy compared to placebo without significant differences between the abatacept and control group in terms of safety.
publisher Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas
publishDate 2012
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-82502012000400022
work_keys_str_mv AT vensonrafael efficacysafetyandtolerabilityofusingabataceptforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT wiensastrid efficacysafetyandtolerabilityofusingabataceptforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT corrercassyanojanuario efficacysafetyandtolerabilityofusingabataceptforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT pontaroloroberto efficacysafetyandtolerabilityofusingabataceptforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
_version_ 1756437755760476160