Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200
Abstract In Brazil, reinforced concrete structures designed based on NBR 6118 [1] must be assessed in fire conditions through NBR 15200 [2], which proposes multiple test methods. Concerning beams, this standard offers the tabular and simplified methods as possible choices. This study aimed to compare these two methods by applying their principles to isostatic and hyperstatic beams with section of 20x50 cm, designed at room temperature according to NBR 6118 [1]. The temperature distribution along sections was obtained by means of a software program. The results from this study indicated that the simplified method yielded higher fire-resistance ratings (FRR) in 75% of cases, although not surpassing the tabular method by 30 minutes. The simplified method allowed an optimization of the results, despite the longer design time.
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Digital revista |
| Langue: | English |
| Publié: |
IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto
2018
|
| Accès en ligne: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000601308 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| Résumé: | Abstract In Brazil, reinforced concrete structures designed based on NBR 6118 [1] must be assessed in fire conditions through NBR 15200 [2], which proposes multiple test methods. Concerning beams, this standard offers the tabular and simplified methods as possible choices. This study aimed to compare these two methods by applying their principles to isostatic and hyperstatic beams with section of 20x50 cm, designed at room temperature according to NBR 6118 [1]. The temperature distribution along sections was obtained by means of a software program. The results from this study indicated that the simplified method yielded higher fire-resistance ratings (FRR) in 75% of cases, although not surpassing the tabular method by 30 minutes. The simplified method allowed an optimization of the results, despite the longer design time. |
|---|