Reliability of a Centroid method to estimate head position in cephalometric diagnosis

ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study was to 1) evaluate the reproducibility of natural head position (NHP) in different professional groups; 2) compare three cephalometric methods of estimating head position to the established natural head position and 3) investigate the applicability of a new method to estimated head position using a Centroid method. Methods The sample consisted of 105 individual cephalometric tracings and photographs. For the first evaluation, copies of the lateral photographs were reproduced for each patient and 3 professionals with different expertise (experienced orthodontists, orthodontic students and orthognatic surgeon) were instructed to position the photographs in NHP. Later, 3 different methods to obtain NHP were assessed: 1) the Frankfort Horizontal Plane (FRANK), 2) Sella-Nasion 7º Line (SN7) and 3) proposed Horizontal Reference Line based on Centroid. Angles formed by the evaluated planes/lines and True Vertical Line obtained were measured. Gender and skeletal discrepancy were considered. Results The results showed a significant difference between NHP obtained from orthodontists and surgeons compared to students (p<0.0001). Also results showed no effect of skeletal classification and gender did on measurement (p>0.05). Both SN minus 7º and FRANK methods showed a high variability (p < 0,01) compared to Centroid method. Conclusion NHP may be affected by the professional experience. The proposed horizontal line based on Centroid is a valid method for estimating head position, thus, may be indicated to use as a diagnostic tool in Orthodontics and Orthognatic Surgery.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SUZUKI,Hideo, SUZUKI,Selly Sayuri, GARCEZ,Aguinaldo Silva, CARVALHAES,Juliana Mandello, FUJII,Denise Nami, LIMA-ARSATI,Ynara Bosco
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100326
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1981-86372020000100326
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1981-863720200001003262020-10-02Reliability of a Centroid method to estimate head position in cephalometric diagnosisSUZUKI,HideoSUZUKI,Selly SayuriGARCEZ,Aguinaldo SilvaCARVALHAES,Juliana MandelloFUJII,Denise NamiLIMA-ARSATI,Ynara Bosco Orthodontics Diagnosis Orthognatic surgery ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study was to 1) evaluate the reproducibility of natural head position (NHP) in different professional groups; 2) compare three cephalometric methods of estimating head position to the established natural head position and 3) investigate the applicability of a new method to estimated head position using a Centroid method. Methods The sample consisted of 105 individual cephalometric tracings and photographs. For the first evaluation, copies of the lateral photographs were reproduced for each patient and 3 professionals with different expertise (experienced orthodontists, orthodontic students and orthognatic surgeon) were instructed to position the photographs in NHP. Later, 3 different methods to obtain NHP were assessed: 1) the Frankfort Horizontal Plane (FRANK), 2) Sella-Nasion 7º Line (SN7) and 3) proposed Horizontal Reference Line based on Centroid. Angles formed by the evaluated planes/lines and True Vertical Line obtained were measured. Gender and skeletal discrepancy were considered. Results The results showed a significant difference between NHP obtained from orthodontists and surgeons compared to students (p<0.0001). Also results showed no effect of skeletal classification and gender did on measurement (p>0.05). Both SN minus 7º and FRANK methods showed a high variability (p < 0,01) compared to Centroid method. Conclusion NHP may be affected by the professional experience. The proposed horizontal line based on Centroid is a valid method for estimating head position, thus, may be indicated to use as a diagnostic tool in Orthodontics and Orthognatic Surgery.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade São Leopoldo MandicRGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia v.68 20202020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100326en10.1590/1981-863720200004520190017
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author SUZUKI,Hideo
SUZUKI,Selly Sayuri
GARCEZ,Aguinaldo Silva
CARVALHAES,Juliana Mandello
FUJII,Denise Nami
LIMA-ARSATI,Ynara Bosco
spellingShingle SUZUKI,Hideo
SUZUKI,Selly Sayuri
GARCEZ,Aguinaldo Silva
CARVALHAES,Juliana Mandello
FUJII,Denise Nami
LIMA-ARSATI,Ynara Bosco
Reliability of a Centroid method to estimate head position in cephalometric diagnosis
author_facet SUZUKI,Hideo
SUZUKI,Selly Sayuri
GARCEZ,Aguinaldo Silva
CARVALHAES,Juliana Mandello
FUJII,Denise Nami
LIMA-ARSATI,Ynara Bosco
author_sort SUZUKI,Hideo
title Reliability of a Centroid method to estimate head position in cephalometric diagnosis
title_short Reliability of a Centroid method to estimate head position in cephalometric diagnosis
title_full Reliability of a Centroid method to estimate head position in cephalometric diagnosis
title_fullStr Reliability of a Centroid method to estimate head position in cephalometric diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of a Centroid method to estimate head position in cephalometric diagnosis
title_sort reliability of a centroid method to estimate head position in cephalometric diagnosis
description ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study was to 1) evaluate the reproducibility of natural head position (NHP) in different professional groups; 2) compare three cephalometric methods of estimating head position to the established natural head position and 3) investigate the applicability of a new method to estimated head position using a Centroid method. Methods The sample consisted of 105 individual cephalometric tracings and photographs. For the first evaluation, copies of the lateral photographs were reproduced for each patient and 3 professionals with different expertise (experienced orthodontists, orthodontic students and orthognatic surgeon) were instructed to position the photographs in NHP. Later, 3 different methods to obtain NHP were assessed: 1) the Frankfort Horizontal Plane (FRANK), 2) Sella-Nasion 7º Line (SN7) and 3) proposed Horizontal Reference Line based on Centroid. Angles formed by the evaluated planes/lines and True Vertical Line obtained were measured. Gender and skeletal discrepancy were considered. Results The results showed a significant difference between NHP obtained from orthodontists and surgeons compared to students (p<0.0001). Also results showed no effect of skeletal classification and gender did on measurement (p>0.05). Both SN minus 7º and FRANK methods showed a high variability (p < 0,01) compared to Centroid method. Conclusion NHP may be affected by the professional experience. The proposed horizontal line based on Centroid is a valid method for estimating head position, thus, may be indicated to use as a diagnostic tool in Orthodontics and Orthognatic Surgery.
publisher Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100326
work_keys_str_mv AT suzukihideo reliabilityofacentroidmethodtoestimateheadpositionincephalometricdiagnosis
AT suzukisellysayuri reliabilityofacentroidmethodtoestimateheadpositionincephalometricdiagnosis
AT garcezaguinaldosilva reliabilityofacentroidmethodtoestimateheadpositionincephalometricdiagnosis
AT carvalhaesjulianamandello reliabilityofacentroidmethodtoestimateheadpositionincephalometricdiagnosis
AT fujiidenisenami reliabilityofacentroidmethodtoestimateheadpositionincephalometricdiagnosis
AT limaarsatiynarabosco reliabilityofacentroidmethodtoestimateheadpositionincephalometricdiagnosis
_version_ 1756435375467790336