Working memory intervention programs for adults: A systematic review

Abstract This systematic review aimed to identify the designs, procedures, and results of empirical studies that performed neuropsychological interventions on WM in adults. Methods: A PubMed and LILACS literature search was conducted using the keywords working memory AND (training OR rehabilitation OR intervention) AND adult. Results: Of the seven studies found, three were randomized controlled trials, two were case reports, one was a clinical trial, and one was an evaluation study. With regard to the type of programs and samples, three studies employed global programs with healthy elderly adults and four employed specific programs for samples with neurologically-impaired adults. Conclusions: The effectiveness of the WM intervention programs was more evident in studies that employed specific methods of rehabilitation for samples with neurological disorders than in those based on global programs with healthy adults. There is a need for more empirical studies to verify the effectiveness of WM intervention programs in order to provide adequate guidance for clinical neuropsychologists and future research.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Netto,Tânia Maria, Greca,Denise Vieira, Zimmermann,Nicolle, Oliveira,Camila, Fonseca,Rochele Paz, Landeira-Fernandez,J.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento 2010
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-57642010000300222
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1980-57642010000300222
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1980-576420100003002222016-07-26Working memory intervention programs for adults: A systematic reviewNetto,Tânia MariaGreca,Denise VieiraZimmermann,NicolleOliveira,CamilaFonseca,Rochele PazLandeira-Fernandez,J. working memory rehabilitation intervention studies effectiveness adults Abstract This systematic review aimed to identify the designs, procedures, and results of empirical studies that performed neuropsychological interventions on WM in adults. Methods: A PubMed and LILACS literature search was conducted using the keywords working memory AND (training OR rehabilitation OR intervention) AND adult. Results: Of the seven studies found, three were randomized controlled trials, two were case reports, one was a clinical trial, and one was an evaluation study. With regard to the type of programs and samples, three studies employed global programs with healthy elderly adults and four employed specific programs for samples with neurologically-impaired adults. Conclusions: The effectiveness of the WM intervention programs was more evident in studies that employed specific methods of rehabilitation for samples with neurological disorders than in those based on global programs with healthy adults. There is a need for more empirical studies to verify the effectiveness of WM intervention programs in order to provide adequate guidance for clinical neuropsychologists and future research.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcademia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e EnvelhecimentoDementia & Neuropsychologia v.4 n.3 20102010-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-57642010000300222en10.1590/S1980-57642010DN40300011
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Netto,Tânia Maria
Greca,Denise Vieira
Zimmermann,Nicolle
Oliveira,Camila
Fonseca,Rochele Paz
Landeira-Fernandez,J.
spellingShingle Netto,Tânia Maria
Greca,Denise Vieira
Zimmermann,Nicolle
Oliveira,Camila
Fonseca,Rochele Paz
Landeira-Fernandez,J.
Working memory intervention programs for adults: A systematic review
author_facet Netto,Tânia Maria
Greca,Denise Vieira
Zimmermann,Nicolle
Oliveira,Camila
Fonseca,Rochele Paz
Landeira-Fernandez,J.
author_sort Netto,Tânia Maria
title Working memory intervention programs for adults: A systematic review
title_short Working memory intervention programs for adults: A systematic review
title_full Working memory intervention programs for adults: A systematic review
title_fullStr Working memory intervention programs for adults: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Working memory intervention programs for adults: A systematic review
title_sort working memory intervention programs for adults: a systematic review
description Abstract This systematic review aimed to identify the designs, procedures, and results of empirical studies that performed neuropsychological interventions on WM in adults. Methods: A PubMed and LILACS literature search was conducted using the keywords working memory AND (training OR rehabilitation OR intervention) AND adult. Results: Of the seven studies found, three were randomized controlled trials, two were case reports, one was a clinical trial, and one was an evaluation study. With regard to the type of programs and samples, three studies employed global programs with healthy elderly adults and four employed specific programs for samples with neurologically-impaired adults. Conclusions: The effectiveness of the WM intervention programs was more evident in studies that employed specific methods of rehabilitation for samples with neurological disorders than in those based on global programs with healthy adults. There is a need for more empirical studies to verify the effectiveness of WM intervention programs in order to provide adequate guidance for clinical neuropsychologists and future research.
publisher Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento
publishDate 2010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-57642010000300222
work_keys_str_mv AT nettotaniamaria workingmemoryinterventionprogramsforadultsasystematicreview
AT grecadenisevieira workingmemoryinterventionprogramsforadultsasystematicreview
AT zimmermannnicolle workingmemoryinterventionprogramsforadultsasystematicreview
AT oliveiracamila workingmemoryinterventionprogramsforadultsasystematicreview
AT fonsecarochelepaz workingmemoryinterventionprogramsforadultsasystematicreview
AT landeirafernandezj workingmemoryinterventionprogramsforadultsasystematicreview
_version_ 1756434434678063104