LS CE-Chirp® vs. Click in the neuroaudiological diagnosis by ABR

Abstract Introduction: The chirp stimulus was developed seeking to counterbalance the delay of the sound wave on its journey through the cochlea, allowing the hair cells to depolarize at the same time. The result is a simultaneous stimulation providing better neural synchrony and, consequently, the recording of responses with greater amplitudes. Objective: To compare the absolute latency of waves I, III and V, the interpeak intervals I-III, III-V and I-V, amplitude values of wave V and its association with the amplitude of wave I, and the interaural difference V-V in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) using Click and LS CE-Chirp® stimuli to determine whether the responses evoked by LS CE-Chirp® could be applied to neuroaudiological diagnosis. Methods: Cross-sectional study with 30 normal-hearing individuals. The parameters used were: intensity of 85 dBnHL, alternating polarity; 17.1 stimuli/s and 100-3000 Hz filters. Results: The absolute latencies of waves I, III and V observed with LS CE-Chirp® and click did not show significant differences. Significantly higher amplitudes of wave V were observed with the LS CE-Chirp®. The interaural difference between the wave V latencies between stimuli showed no significant difference. Conclusion: The LS CE-Chirp® stimulus was shown to be as efficient as the click to capture ABR at high levels of stimulation, with the advantage of producing greater-amplitude V waves.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cargnelutti,Michelle, Cóser,Pedro Luis, Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942017000300313
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1808-86942017000300313
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1808-869420170003003132017-06-26LS CE-Chirp® vs. Click in the neuroaudiological diagnosis by ABRCargnelutti,MichelleCóser,Pedro LuisBiaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira Hearing Electrophysiology Auditory brainstem response Abstract Introduction: The chirp stimulus was developed seeking to counterbalance the delay of the sound wave on its journey through the cochlea, allowing the hair cells to depolarize at the same time. The result is a simultaneous stimulation providing better neural synchrony and, consequently, the recording of responses with greater amplitudes. Objective: To compare the absolute latency of waves I, III and V, the interpeak intervals I-III, III-V and I-V, amplitude values of wave V and its association with the amplitude of wave I, and the interaural difference V-V in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) using Click and LS CE-Chirp® stimuli to determine whether the responses evoked by LS CE-Chirp® could be applied to neuroaudiological diagnosis. Methods: Cross-sectional study with 30 normal-hearing individuals. The parameters used were: intensity of 85 dBnHL, alternating polarity; 17.1 stimuli/s and 100-3000 Hz filters. Results: The absolute latencies of waves I, III and V observed with LS CE-Chirp® and click did not show significant differences. Significantly higher amplitudes of wave V were observed with the LS CE-Chirp®. The interaural difference between the wave V latencies between stimuli showed no significant difference. Conclusion: The LS CE-Chirp® stimulus was shown to be as efficient as the click to capture ABR at high levels of stimulation, with the advantage of producing greater-amplitude V waves.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.83 n.3 20172017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942017000300313en10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.04.018
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Cargnelutti,Michelle
Cóser,Pedro Luis
Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
spellingShingle Cargnelutti,Michelle
Cóser,Pedro Luis
Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
LS CE-Chirp® vs. Click in the neuroaudiological diagnosis by ABR
author_facet Cargnelutti,Michelle
Cóser,Pedro Luis
Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
author_sort Cargnelutti,Michelle
title LS CE-Chirp® vs. Click in the neuroaudiological diagnosis by ABR
title_short LS CE-Chirp® vs. Click in the neuroaudiological diagnosis by ABR
title_full LS CE-Chirp® vs. Click in the neuroaudiological diagnosis by ABR
title_fullStr LS CE-Chirp® vs. Click in the neuroaudiological diagnosis by ABR
title_full_unstemmed LS CE-Chirp® vs. Click in the neuroaudiological diagnosis by ABR
title_sort ls ce-chirp® vs. click in the neuroaudiological diagnosis by abr
description Abstract Introduction: The chirp stimulus was developed seeking to counterbalance the delay of the sound wave on its journey through the cochlea, allowing the hair cells to depolarize at the same time. The result is a simultaneous stimulation providing better neural synchrony and, consequently, the recording of responses with greater amplitudes. Objective: To compare the absolute latency of waves I, III and V, the interpeak intervals I-III, III-V and I-V, amplitude values of wave V and its association with the amplitude of wave I, and the interaural difference V-V in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) using Click and LS CE-Chirp® stimuli to determine whether the responses evoked by LS CE-Chirp® could be applied to neuroaudiological diagnosis. Methods: Cross-sectional study with 30 normal-hearing individuals. The parameters used were: intensity of 85 dBnHL, alternating polarity; 17.1 stimuli/s and 100-3000 Hz filters. Results: The absolute latencies of waves I, III and V observed with LS CE-Chirp® and click did not show significant differences. Significantly higher amplitudes of wave V were observed with the LS CE-Chirp®. The interaural difference between the wave V latencies between stimuli showed no significant difference. Conclusion: The LS CE-Chirp® stimulus was shown to be as efficient as the click to capture ABR at high levels of stimulation, with the advantage of producing greater-amplitude V waves.
publisher Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942017000300313
work_keys_str_mv AT cargneluttimichelle lscechirpvsclickintheneuroaudiologicaldiagnosisbyabr
AT coserpedroluis lscechirpvsclickintheneuroaudiologicaldiagnosisbyabr
AT biaggioeliarapintovieira lscechirpvsclickintheneuroaudiologicaldiagnosisbyabr
_version_ 1756433284419551232