Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures
INTRODUCTION: Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle appears to be increasing in athletes. However, the optimal treatment strategy has not yet been established. OBJECTIVES: To compare the isokinetic shoulder performance after surgical treatment to that after non-surgical treatment for pectoralis major muscle rupture. METHODS: We assessed 33 pectoralis major muscle ruptures (18 treated non-surgically and 15 treated surgically). Horizontal abduction and adduction as well as external and internal rotation at 60 and 120 degrees/s were tested in both upper limbs. Peak torque, total work, contralateral deficiency, and the peak torque agonist-to-antagonist ratio were measured. RESULTS: Contralateral muscular deficiency did not differ between the surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities. However, the surgical group presented twice the number of athletes with clinically acceptable contralateral deficiency (<20%) for internal rotators compared to the non-surgical group. The peak torque ratio between the external and internal rotator muscles revealed a similar deficit of the external rotation in both groups and on both sides (surgical, 61.60% and 57.80% and non-surgical, 62.06% and 54.06%, for the dominant and non-dominant sides, respectively). The peak torque ratio revealed that the horizontal adduction muscles on the injured side showed similar weakness in both groups (surgical, 86.27%; non-surgical, 98.61%). CONCLUSIONS: This study included the largest single series of athletes reported to date for this type of injury. A comparative analysis of muscular strength and balance showed no differences between the treatment modalities for pectoralis major muscle rupture. However, the number of significant clinical deficiencies was lower in the surgical group than in the non-surgical group, and both treatment modalities require greater attention to the rehabilitation process, especially for the recovery of muscle strength and balance.
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP
2011
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322011000200022 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1807-59322011000200022 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1807-593220110002000222012-07-23Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical proceduresFleury,Anna MariaSilva,Antonio Carlos daPochini,Alberto Alberto de CastroEjnisman,BennoLira,Claudio Andre Barbosa deAndrade,Marilia dos Santos Isokinetic exercise exercise muscle imbalance muscle rupture orthopedics rehabilitation INTRODUCTION: Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle appears to be increasing in athletes. However, the optimal treatment strategy has not yet been established. OBJECTIVES: To compare the isokinetic shoulder performance after surgical treatment to that after non-surgical treatment for pectoralis major muscle rupture. METHODS: We assessed 33 pectoralis major muscle ruptures (18 treated non-surgically and 15 treated surgically). Horizontal abduction and adduction as well as external and internal rotation at 60 and 120 degrees/s were tested in both upper limbs. Peak torque, total work, contralateral deficiency, and the peak torque agonist-to-antagonist ratio were measured. RESULTS: Contralateral muscular deficiency did not differ between the surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities. However, the surgical group presented twice the number of athletes with clinically acceptable contralateral deficiency (<20%) for internal rotators compared to the non-surgical group. The peak torque ratio between the external and internal rotator muscles revealed a similar deficit of the external rotation in both groups and on both sides (surgical, 61.60% and 57.80% and non-surgical, 62.06% and 54.06%, for the dominant and non-dominant sides, respectively). The peak torque ratio revealed that the horizontal adduction muscles on the injured side showed similar weakness in both groups (surgical, 86.27%; non-surgical, 98.61%). CONCLUSIONS: This study included the largest single series of athletes reported to date for this type of injury. A comparative analysis of muscular strength and balance showed no differences between the treatment modalities for pectoralis major muscle rupture. However, the number of significant clinical deficiencies was lower in the surgical group than in the non-surgical group, and both treatment modalities require greater attention to the rehabilitation process, especially for the recovery of muscle strength and balance.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics v.66 n.2 20112011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322011000200022en10.1590/S1807-59322011000200022 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Fleury,Anna Maria Silva,Antonio Carlos da Pochini,Alberto Alberto de Castro Ejnisman,Benno Lira,Claudio Andre Barbosa de Andrade,Marilia dos Santos |
spellingShingle |
Fleury,Anna Maria Silva,Antonio Carlos da Pochini,Alberto Alberto de Castro Ejnisman,Benno Lira,Claudio Andre Barbosa de Andrade,Marilia dos Santos Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures |
author_facet |
Fleury,Anna Maria Silva,Antonio Carlos da Pochini,Alberto Alberto de Castro Ejnisman,Benno Lira,Claudio Andre Barbosa de Andrade,Marilia dos Santos |
author_sort |
Fleury,Anna Maria |
title |
Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures |
title_short |
Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures |
title_full |
Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures |
title_fullStr |
Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures |
title_sort |
isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures |
description |
INTRODUCTION: Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle appears to be increasing in athletes. However, the optimal treatment strategy has not yet been established. OBJECTIVES: To compare the isokinetic shoulder performance after surgical treatment to that after non-surgical treatment for pectoralis major muscle rupture. METHODS: We assessed 33 pectoralis major muscle ruptures (18 treated non-surgically and 15 treated surgically). Horizontal abduction and adduction as well as external and internal rotation at 60 and 120 degrees/s were tested in both upper limbs. Peak torque, total work, contralateral deficiency, and the peak torque agonist-to-antagonist ratio were measured. RESULTS: Contralateral muscular deficiency did not differ between the surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities. However, the surgical group presented twice the number of athletes with clinically acceptable contralateral deficiency (<20%) for internal rotators compared to the non-surgical group. The peak torque ratio between the external and internal rotator muscles revealed a similar deficit of the external rotation in both groups and on both sides (surgical, 61.60% and 57.80% and non-surgical, 62.06% and 54.06%, for the dominant and non-dominant sides, respectively). The peak torque ratio revealed that the horizontal adduction muscles on the injured side showed similar weakness in both groups (surgical, 86.27%; non-surgical, 98.61%). CONCLUSIONS: This study included the largest single series of athletes reported to date for this type of injury. A comparative analysis of muscular strength and balance showed no differences between the treatment modalities for pectoralis major muscle rupture. However, the number of significant clinical deficiencies was lower in the surgical group than in the non-surgical group, and both treatment modalities require greater attention to the rehabilitation process, especially for the recovery of muscle strength and balance. |
publisher |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322011000200022 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fleuryannamaria isokineticmuscleassessmentaftertreatmentofpectoralismajormuscleruptureusingsurgicalornonsurgicalprocedures AT silvaantoniocarlosda isokineticmuscleassessmentaftertreatmentofpectoralismajormuscleruptureusingsurgicalornonsurgicalprocedures AT pochinialbertoalbertodecastro isokineticmuscleassessmentaftertreatmentofpectoralismajormuscleruptureusingsurgicalornonsurgicalprocedures AT ejnismanbenno isokineticmuscleassessmentaftertreatmentofpectoralismajormuscleruptureusingsurgicalornonsurgicalprocedures AT liraclaudioandrebarbosade isokineticmuscleassessmentaftertreatmentofpectoralismajormuscleruptureusingsurgicalornonsurgicalprocedures AT andrademariliadossantos isokineticmuscleassessmentaftertreatmentofpectoralismajormuscleruptureusingsurgicalornonsurgicalprocedures |
_version_ |
1756432101870141440 |