Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impairment of endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve after administration of intracoronary acetylcholine and adenosine, and its association with hypertensive cardiac disease. INTRODUCTION: Coronary blood flow reserve reduction has been proposed as a mechanism for the progression of compensated left ventricular hypertrophy to ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: Eighteen hypertensive patients with normal epicardial coronary arteries on angiography were divided into two groups according to left ventricular fractional shortening (FS). Group 1 (FS >0.25): n=8, FS=0.29 ± 0.03; Group 2 (FS <0.25): n=10, FS= 0.17 ± 0.03. RESULTS: Baseline coronary blood flow was similar in both groups (Group 1: 80.15 ± 26.41 mL/min, Group 2: 100.09 ± 21.51 mL/min, p=NS). In response to adenosine, coronary blood flow increased to 265.1 ± 100.2 mL/min in Group 1 and to 300.8 ± 113.6 mL/min (p <0.05) in Group 2. Endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve was similar in both groups (Group 1: 3.31 ± 0.68 and Group 2: 2.97 ± 0.80, p=NS). In response to acetylcholine, coronary blood flow increased to 156.08 ± 36.79 mL/min in Group 1 and to 177.8 ± 83.6 mL/min in Group 2 (p <0.05). Endothelium-dependent coronary blood flow reserve was similar in the two groups (Group 1: 2.08 ± 0.74 and group Group 2: 1.76 ± 0.61, p=NS). Peak acetylcholine/peak adenosine coronary blood flow response (Group 1: 0.65 ± 0.27 and Group 2: 0.60 ± 0.17) and minimal coronary vascular resistance (Group 1: 0.48 ± 0.21 mmHg/mL/min and Group 2: 0.34 ± 0.12 mmHg/mL/min) were similar in both groups (p= NS). Casual diastolic blood pressure and end-systolic left ventricular stress were independently associated with FS. CONCLUSIONS: In our hypertensive patients, endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve vasodilator administrations had similar effects in patients with either normal or decreased left ventricular systolic function.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rocha,Aloísio Marchi, Salemi,Vera Maria Cury, Lemos Neto,Pedro Alves, Matsumoto,Afonso Yoshikiro, Pereira,Valéria Fontenelle Angelim, Fernandes,Fábio, Nastari,Luciano, Mady,Charles
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2009
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322009000400011
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1807-59322009000400011
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1807-593220090004000112009-06-18Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertensionRocha,Aloísio MarchiSalemi,Vera Maria CuryLemos Neto,Pedro AlvesMatsumoto,Afonso YoshikiroPereira,Valéria Fontenelle AngelimFernandes,FábioNastari,LucianoMady,Charles Coronary blood flow reserve Hypertension Heart failure Adenosine Acetylcholine OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impairment of endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve after administration of intracoronary acetylcholine and adenosine, and its association with hypertensive cardiac disease. INTRODUCTION: Coronary blood flow reserve reduction has been proposed as a mechanism for the progression of compensated left ventricular hypertrophy to ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: Eighteen hypertensive patients with normal epicardial coronary arteries on angiography were divided into two groups according to left ventricular fractional shortening (FS). Group 1 (FS >0.25): n=8, FS=0.29 ± 0.03; Group 2 (FS <0.25): n=10, FS= 0.17 ± 0.03. RESULTS: Baseline coronary blood flow was similar in both groups (Group 1: 80.15 ± 26.41 mL/min, Group 2: 100.09 ± 21.51 mL/min, p=NS). In response to adenosine, coronary blood flow increased to 265.1 ± 100.2 mL/min in Group 1 and to 300.8 ± 113.6 mL/min (p <0.05) in Group 2. Endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve was similar in both groups (Group 1: 3.31 ± 0.68 and Group 2: 2.97 ± 0.80, p=NS). In response to acetylcholine, coronary blood flow increased to 156.08 ± 36.79 mL/min in Group 1 and to 177.8 ± 83.6 mL/min in Group 2 (p <0.05). Endothelium-dependent coronary blood flow reserve was similar in the two groups (Group 1: 2.08 ± 0.74 and group Group 2: 1.76 ± 0.61, p=NS). Peak acetylcholine/peak adenosine coronary blood flow response (Group 1: 0.65 ± 0.27 and Group 2: 0.60 ± 0.17) and minimal coronary vascular resistance (Group 1: 0.48 ± 0.21 mmHg/mL/min and Group 2: 0.34 ± 0.12 mmHg/mL/min) were similar in both groups (p= NS). Casual diastolic blood pressure and end-systolic left ventricular stress were independently associated with FS. CONCLUSIONS: In our hypertensive patients, endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve vasodilator administrations had similar effects in patients with either normal or decreased left ventricular systolic function.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics v.64 n.4 20092009-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322009000400011en10.1590/S1807-59322009000400011
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Rocha,Aloísio Marchi
Salemi,Vera Maria Cury
Lemos Neto,Pedro Alves
Matsumoto,Afonso Yoshikiro
Pereira,Valéria Fontenelle Angelim
Fernandes,Fábio
Nastari,Luciano
Mady,Charles
spellingShingle Rocha,Aloísio Marchi
Salemi,Vera Maria Cury
Lemos Neto,Pedro Alves
Matsumoto,Afonso Yoshikiro
Pereira,Valéria Fontenelle Angelim
Fernandes,Fábio
Nastari,Luciano
Mady,Charles
Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension
author_facet Rocha,Aloísio Marchi
Salemi,Vera Maria Cury
Lemos Neto,Pedro Alves
Matsumoto,Afonso Yoshikiro
Pereira,Valéria Fontenelle Angelim
Fernandes,Fábio
Nastari,Luciano
Mady,Charles
author_sort Rocha,Aloísio Marchi
title Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension
title_short Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension
title_full Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension
title_fullStr Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension
title_sort endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension
description OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impairment of endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve after administration of intracoronary acetylcholine and adenosine, and its association with hypertensive cardiac disease. INTRODUCTION: Coronary blood flow reserve reduction has been proposed as a mechanism for the progression of compensated left ventricular hypertrophy to ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: Eighteen hypertensive patients with normal epicardial coronary arteries on angiography were divided into two groups according to left ventricular fractional shortening (FS). Group 1 (FS >0.25): n=8, FS=0.29 ± 0.03; Group 2 (FS <0.25): n=10, FS= 0.17 ± 0.03. RESULTS: Baseline coronary blood flow was similar in both groups (Group 1: 80.15 ± 26.41 mL/min, Group 2: 100.09 ± 21.51 mL/min, p=NS). In response to adenosine, coronary blood flow increased to 265.1 ± 100.2 mL/min in Group 1 and to 300.8 ± 113.6 mL/min (p <0.05) in Group 2. Endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve was similar in both groups (Group 1: 3.31 ± 0.68 and Group 2: 2.97 ± 0.80, p=NS). In response to acetylcholine, coronary blood flow increased to 156.08 ± 36.79 mL/min in Group 1 and to 177.8 ± 83.6 mL/min in Group 2 (p <0.05). Endothelium-dependent coronary blood flow reserve was similar in the two groups (Group 1: 2.08 ± 0.74 and group Group 2: 1.76 ± 0.61, p=NS). Peak acetylcholine/peak adenosine coronary blood flow response (Group 1: 0.65 ± 0.27 and Group 2: 0.60 ± 0.17) and minimal coronary vascular resistance (Group 1: 0.48 ± 0.21 mmHg/mL/min and Group 2: 0.34 ± 0.12 mmHg/mL/min) were similar in both groups (p= NS). Casual diastolic blood pressure and end-systolic left ventricular stress were independently associated with FS. CONCLUSIONS: In our hypertensive patients, endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve vasodilator administrations had similar effects in patients with either normal or decreased left ventricular systolic function.
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
publishDate 2009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322009000400011
work_keys_str_mv AT rochaaloisiomarchi endothelialandnonendothelialcoronarybloodflowreserveandleftventriculardysfunctioninsystemichypertension
AT salemiveramariacury endothelialandnonendothelialcoronarybloodflowreserveandleftventriculardysfunctioninsystemichypertension
AT lemosnetopedroalves endothelialandnonendothelialcoronarybloodflowreserveandleftventriculardysfunctioninsystemichypertension
AT matsumotoafonsoyoshikiro endothelialandnonendothelialcoronarybloodflowreserveandleftventriculardysfunctioninsystemichypertension
AT pereiravaleriafontenelleangelim endothelialandnonendothelialcoronarybloodflowreserveandleftventriculardysfunctioninsystemichypertension
AT fernandesfabio endothelialandnonendothelialcoronarybloodflowreserveandleftventriculardysfunctioninsystemichypertension
AT nastariluciano endothelialandnonendothelialcoronarybloodflowreserveandleftventriculardysfunctioninsystemichypertension
AT madycharles endothelialandnonendothelialcoronarybloodflowreserveandleftventriculardysfunctioninsystemichypertension
_version_ 1756432040523202560