Pin tract sepsis: Incidence with the use of circular fixators in a limb reconstruction unit

BACKGROUND: Pin site-related problems remain one of the most common complications in the realm of limb reconstructive surgery. Several factors determine the integrity of the bone-pin interface, including the insertion technique, the mechanical forces applied through the frame and the selected pin site care protocol. Pin site complications can be catastrophic as they may lead to failure of the bone-pin interface and, possibly, osteomyelitis. METHODS: Between July 2008 and July 2011, 111 patients at our Limb Reconstruction Unit were treated with circular external fixators. These patients' records were reviewed with regard to pin site complications, treatment thereof and outcome. RESULTS: Eighty patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pin site infection was found in 21 patients (26.25%). One patient had a major infection, which required debridement of the pin tract. The remaining 20 cases were all minor infections that responded to local treatment and oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Circular external fixation remains a safe treatment method, with the majority of pin site complications being of a minor nature that respond readily to local treatment and oral antibiotics

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ferreira,N, Marais,LC
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Medpharm Publications 2012
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1681-150X2012000100007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1681-150X2012000100007
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1681-150X20120001000072012-07-02Pin tract sepsis: Incidence with the use of circular fixators in a limb reconstruction unitFerreira,NMarais,LC Pin site complications external fixation BACKGROUND: Pin site-related problems remain one of the most common complications in the realm of limb reconstructive surgery. Several factors determine the integrity of the bone-pin interface, including the insertion technique, the mechanical forces applied through the frame and the selected pin site care protocol. Pin site complications can be catastrophic as they may lead to failure of the bone-pin interface and, possibly, osteomyelitis. METHODS: Between July 2008 and July 2011, 111 patients at our Limb Reconstruction Unit were treated with circular external fixators. These patients' records were reviewed with regard to pin site complications, treatment thereof and outcome. RESULTS: Eighty patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pin site infection was found in 21 patients (26.25%). One patient had a major infection, which required debridement of the pin tract. The remaining 20 cases were all minor infections that responded to local treatment and oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Circular external fixation remains a safe treatment method, with the majority of pin site complications being of a minor nature that respond readily to local treatment and oral antibioticsMedpharm PublicationsSA Orthopaedic Journal v.11 n.1 20122012-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1681-150X2012000100007en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Ferreira,N
Marais,LC
spellingShingle Ferreira,N
Marais,LC
Pin tract sepsis: Incidence with the use of circular fixators in a limb reconstruction unit
author_facet Ferreira,N
Marais,LC
author_sort Ferreira,N
title Pin tract sepsis: Incidence with the use of circular fixators in a limb reconstruction unit
title_short Pin tract sepsis: Incidence with the use of circular fixators in a limb reconstruction unit
title_full Pin tract sepsis: Incidence with the use of circular fixators in a limb reconstruction unit
title_fullStr Pin tract sepsis: Incidence with the use of circular fixators in a limb reconstruction unit
title_full_unstemmed Pin tract sepsis: Incidence with the use of circular fixators in a limb reconstruction unit
title_sort pin tract sepsis: incidence with the use of circular fixators in a limb reconstruction unit
description BACKGROUND: Pin site-related problems remain one of the most common complications in the realm of limb reconstructive surgery. Several factors determine the integrity of the bone-pin interface, including the insertion technique, the mechanical forces applied through the frame and the selected pin site care protocol. Pin site complications can be catastrophic as they may lead to failure of the bone-pin interface and, possibly, osteomyelitis. METHODS: Between July 2008 and July 2011, 111 patients at our Limb Reconstruction Unit were treated with circular external fixators. These patients' records were reviewed with regard to pin site complications, treatment thereof and outcome. RESULTS: Eighty patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pin site infection was found in 21 patients (26.25%). One patient had a major infection, which required debridement of the pin tract. The remaining 20 cases were all minor infections that responded to local treatment and oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Circular external fixation remains a safe treatment method, with the majority of pin site complications being of a minor nature that respond readily to local treatment and oral antibiotics
publisher Medpharm Publications
publishDate 2012
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1681-150X2012000100007
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreiran pintractsepsisincidencewiththeuseofcircularfixatorsinalimbreconstructionunit
AT maraislc pintractsepsisincidencewiththeuseofcircularfixatorsinalimbreconstructionunit
_version_ 1756007341177700352