Toxinology in the proteomics era: a review on arachnid venom proteomics

Abstract The word venomics was coined to acknowledge the studies that use omics to investigate venom proteins and peptides. Venomics has evolved considerably over the last 20 years. The first works on scorpion or spider venomics were published in the early 2000’s. Such studies relied on peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) to characterize venom complexity. After the introduction of new mass spectrometers with higher resolution, sensitivity and mass accuracy, and the next-generation nucleotide sequencing, the complexity of data reported in research on scorpion and spider venomics increased exponentially, which allowed more comprehensive studies. In the present review article, we covered key publications on scorpion venomics and spider venomics, presenting historical grounds and implemented technologies over the last years. The literature presented in this review was selected after searching the PubMed database using the terms “(scorpion venom) AND (proteome)” for scorpion venomics, and “(spider venom) AND (proteome)” for publications on spider venomics. We presented the key aspects related to proteomics in the covered papers including, but not restricted to, the employed proteomic strategy (i.e., PMF, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, shotgun/bottom-up and/or top-down/peptidome), and the type of mass spectrometer used. Some conclusions can be drawn from the present study. For example, the scorpion genus Tityus is the most studied concerning venomics, followed by Centruroides; whereas for spiders the studied genera were found more equally distributed. Another interesting conclusion is the lack of high throughput studies on post-translational modifications (PTMs) of scorpion and spider proteins. In our opinion, PTMs should be more studied as they can modulate the activity of scorpion and spider toxins.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marchi,Filipi Calbaizer, Mendes-Silva,Edneia, Rodrigues-Ribeiro,Lucas, Bolais-Ramos,Lucas Gabriel, Verano-Braga,Thiago
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Centro de Estudos de Venenos e Animais Peçonhentos (CEVAP/UNESP) 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-91992022000100201
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1678-91992022000100201
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1678-919920220001002012022-02-25Toxinology in the proteomics era: a review on arachnid venom proteomicsMarchi,Filipi CalbaizerMendes-Silva,EdneiaRodrigues-Ribeiro,LucasBolais-Ramos,Lucas GabrielVerano-Braga,Thiago Proteomics Scorpions Spiders Venomics Abstract The word venomics was coined to acknowledge the studies that use omics to investigate venom proteins and peptides. Venomics has evolved considerably over the last 20 years. The first works on scorpion or spider venomics were published in the early 2000’s. Such studies relied on peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) to characterize venom complexity. After the introduction of new mass spectrometers with higher resolution, sensitivity and mass accuracy, and the next-generation nucleotide sequencing, the complexity of data reported in research on scorpion and spider venomics increased exponentially, which allowed more comprehensive studies. In the present review article, we covered key publications on scorpion venomics and spider venomics, presenting historical grounds and implemented technologies over the last years. The literature presented in this review was selected after searching the PubMed database using the terms “(scorpion venom) AND (proteome)” for scorpion venomics, and “(spider venom) AND (proteome)” for publications on spider venomics. We presented the key aspects related to proteomics in the covered papers including, but not restricted to, the employed proteomic strategy (i.e., PMF, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, shotgun/bottom-up and/or top-down/peptidome), and the type of mass spectrometer used. Some conclusions can be drawn from the present study. For example, the scorpion genus Tityus is the most studied concerning venomics, followed by Centruroides; whereas for spiders the studied genera were found more equally distributed. Another interesting conclusion is the lack of high throughput studies on post-translational modifications (PTMs) of scorpion and spider proteins. In our opinion, PTMs should be more studied as they can modulate the activity of scorpion and spider toxins.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCentro de Estudos de Venenos e Animais Peçonhentos (CEVAP/UNESP)Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases v.28 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-91992022000100201en10.1590/1678-9199-jvatitd-2021-0034
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Marchi,Filipi Calbaizer
Mendes-Silva,Edneia
Rodrigues-Ribeiro,Lucas
Bolais-Ramos,Lucas Gabriel
Verano-Braga,Thiago
spellingShingle Marchi,Filipi Calbaizer
Mendes-Silva,Edneia
Rodrigues-Ribeiro,Lucas
Bolais-Ramos,Lucas Gabriel
Verano-Braga,Thiago
Toxinology in the proteomics era: a review on arachnid venom proteomics
author_facet Marchi,Filipi Calbaizer
Mendes-Silva,Edneia
Rodrigues-Ribeiro,Lucas
Bolais-Ramos,Lucas Gabriel
Verano-Braga,Thiago
author_sort Marchi,Filipi Calbaizer
title Toxinology in the proteomics era: a review on arachnid venom proteomics
title_short Toxinology in the proteomics era: a review on arachnid venom proteomics
title_full Toxinology in the proteomics era: a review on arachnid venom proteomics
title_fullStr Toxinology in the proteomics era: a review on arachnid venom proteomics
title_full_unstemmed Toxinology in the proteomics era: a review on arachnid venom proteomics
title_sort toxinology in the proteomics era: a review on arachnid venom proteomics
description Abstract The word venomics was coined to acknowledge the studies that use omics to investigate venom proteins and peptides. Venomics has evolved considerably over the last 20 years. The first works on scorpion or spider venomics were published in the early 2000’s. Such studies relied on peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) to characterize venom complexity. After the introduction of new mass spectrometers with higher resolution, sensitivity and mass accuracy, and the next-generation nucleotide sequencing, the complexity of data reported in research on scorpion and spider venomics increased exponentially, which allowed more comprehensive studies. In the present review article, we covered key publications on scorpion venomics and spider venomics, presenting historical grounds and implemented technologies over the last years. The literature presented in this review was selected after searching the PubMed database using the terms “(scorpion venom) AND (proteome)” for scorpion venomics, and “(spider venom) AND (proteome)” for publications on spider venomics. We presented the key aspects related to proteomics in the covered papers including, but not restricted to, the employed proteomic strategy (i.e., PMF, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, shotgun/bottom-up and/or top-down/peptidome), and the type of mass spectrometer used. Some conclusions can be drawn from the present study. For example, the scorpion genus Tityus is the most studied concerning venomics, followed by Centruroides; whereas for spiders the studied genera were found more equally distributed. Another interesting conclusion is the lack of high throughput studies on post-translational modifications (PTMs) of scorpion and spider proteins. In our opinion, PTMs should be more studied as they can modulate the activity of scorpion and spider toxins.
publisher Centro de Estudos de Venenos e Animais Peçonhentos (CEVAP/UNESP)
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-91992022000100201
work_keys_str_mv AT marchifilipicalbaizer toxinologyintheproteomicseraareviewonarachnidvenomproteomics
AT mendessilvaedneia toxinologyintheproteomicseraareviewonarachnidvenomproteomics
AT rodriguesribeirolucas toxinologyintheproteomicseraareviewonarachnidvenomproteomics
AT bolaisramoslucasgabriel toxinologyintheproteomicseraareviewonarachnidvenomproteomics
AT veranobragathiago toxinologyintheproteomicseraareviewonarachnidvenomproteomics
_version_ 1756429254825869312