Vasectomy re-reversal: effectiveness and parameters associated with its success

ABSTRACT Introduction: When the vasectomy reversal (VR) fails, and the patient desires natural conception with his sperm, vasectomy re-reversal (VRR) is the only alternative. Purpose: To determine the VRR effectiveness and whether specific parameters can be associated with its success. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 18 consecutive vasectomized patients, who had failed their VR through bilateral vasovasostomy, and posteriorly were submitted to VRR. The parameters of the study were: age of the patients, elapsed time between vasectomy and VRR (V-VRRt), elapsed time between VR and VRR (VR-VRRt), presence of spermatozoa in the proximal vas deferens fluid (SptzVDF) in the VRR and results of semen analysis after VRR (SA-VRR). Results: The mean of the age of the patients was 44.11±6.55 years (32.0-57.0), the mean of V-VRRt was 11.76±6.46 years (1.5-25.0) and the mean of VR-VRRt was 2.13±2.27 years (0.5-10.0). SptzVDF in the VRR were found bilaterally in 8 patients, unilaterally in 4 and absent in 6. SA-VRR demonstrated normozoospermia in 9 patients, oligozoospermia in 3 and azoospermia in 6, with patency rate of 66.67%. SA-VRR showed statistically significant dependence only with SptzVDF in the VRR (p <0.01). Conclusions: VRR was effective in restoring the obstruction in more than half of the patients. Furthermore, the presence of spermatozoa in the vas deferens fluid was the parameter associated with the VRR success.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorenzini,Mariana S., Lorenzini,Fernando, Bezerra,Cícero A.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2021
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000300544
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382021000300544
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820210003005442021-03-24Vasectomy re-reversal: effectiveness and parameters associated with its successLorenzini,Mariana S.Lorenzini,FernandoBezerra,Cícero A. Spermatozoa Vasectomy Vasovasostomy ABSTRACT Introduction: When the vasectomy reversal (VR) fails, and the patient desires natural conception with his sperm, vasectomy re-reversal (VRR) is the only alternative. Purpose: To determine the VRR effectiveness and whether specific parameters can be associated with its success. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 18 consecutive vasectomized patients, who had failed their VR through bilateral vasovasostomy, and posteriorly were submitted to VRR. The parameters of the study were: age of the patients, elapsed time between vasectomy and VRR (V-VRRt), elapsed time between VR and VRR (VR-VRRt), presence of spermatozoa in the proximal vas deferens fluid (SptzVDF) in the VRR and results of semen analysis after VRR (SA-VRR). Results: The mean of the age of the patients was 44.11±6.55 years (32.0-57.0), the mean of V-VRRt was 11.76±6.46 years (1.5-25.0) and the mean of VR-VRRt was 2.13±2.27 years (0.5-10.0). SptzVDF in the VRR were found bilaterally in 8 patients, unilaterally in 4 and absent in 6. SA-VRR demonstrated normozoospermia in 9 patients, oligozoospermia in 3 and azoospermia in 6, with patency rate of 66.67%. SA-VRR showed statistically significant dependence only with SptzVDF in the VRR (p <0.01). Conclusions: VRR was effective in restoring the obstruction in more than half of the patients. Furthermore, the presence of spermatozoa in the vas deferens fluid was the parameter associated with the VRR success.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.47 n.3 20212021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000300544en10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0310
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Lorenzini,Mariana S.
Lorenzini,Fernando
Bezerra,Cícero A.
spellingShingle Lorenzini,Mariana S.
Lorenzini,Fernando
Bezerra,Cícero A.
Vasectomy re-reversal: effectiveness and parameters associated with its success
author_facet Lorenzini,Mariana S.
Lorenzini,Fernando
Bezerra,Cícero A.
author_sort Lorenzini,Mariana S.
title Vasectomy re-reversal: effectiveness and parameters associated with its success
title_short Vasectomy re-reversal: effectiveness and parameters associated with its success
title_full Vasectomy re-reversal: effectiveness and parameters associated with its success
title_fullStr Vasectomy re-reversal: effectiveness and parameters associated with its success
title_full_unstemmed Vasectomy re-reversal: effectiveness and parameters associated with its success
title_sort vasectomy re-reversal: effectiveness and parameters associated with its success
description ABSTRACT Introduction: When the vasectomy reversal (VR) fails, and the patient desires natural conception with his sperm, vasectomy re-reversal (VRR) is the only alternative. Purpose: To determine the VRR effectiveness and whether specific parameters can be associated with its success. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 18 consecutive vasectomized patients, who had failed their VR through bilateral vasovasostomy, and posteriorly were submitted to VRR. The parameters of the study were: age of the patients, elapsed time between vasectomy and VRR (V-VRRt), elapsed time between VR and VRR (VR-VRRt), presence of spermatozoa in the proximal vas deferens fluid (SptzVDF) in the VRR and results of semen analysis after VRR (SA-VRR). Results: The mean of the age of the patients was 44.11±6.55 years (32.0-57.0), the mean of V-VRRt was 11.76±6.46 years (1.5-25.0) and the mean of VR-VRRt was 2.13±2.27 years (0.5-10.0). SptzVDF in the VRR were found bilaterally in 8 patients, unilaterally in 4 and absent in 6. SA-VRR demonstrated normozoospermia in 9 patients, oligozoospermia in 3 and azoospermia in 6, with patency rate of 66.67%. SA-VRR showed statistically significant dependence only with SptzVDF in the VRR (p <0.01). Conclusions: VRR was effective in restoring the obstruction in more than half of the patients. Furthermore, the presence of spermatozoa in the vas deferens fluid was the parameter associated with the VRR success.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2021
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000300544
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzinimarianas vasectomyrereversaleffectivenessandparametersassociatedwithitssuccess
AT lorenzinifernando vasectomyrereversaleffectivenessandparametersassociatedwithitssuccess
AT bezerraciceroa vasectomyrereversaleffectivenessandparametersassociatedwithitssuccess
_version_ 1756428338428116992