Unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, Brazil

Abstract: The Native Vegetation Protection Law - 2012 - (NVPL) is the main Brazilian regulation for protecting native vegetation (NV) on private land. The NVPL, currently in the implementation phase, reduced Legal Reserves (LR) requirements compared to its previous version, the 1965's Forest Act (FA), through several legal mechanisms. Among them, Article 68 (Art.68) exempts landholders from LR obligations if NV was converted without offending the legislation in place at the time of the conversion. The technical implementation of Art. 68 is controversial and its effects are still unknown. We developed a model to estimate the effects of Art.68 on LR using São Paulo State (Brazil) as case study. We analyzed former environmental laws to identify key periods in which NV preservation requirements had changed. After, we searched for past spatial data on NV cover with sufficient accuracy for each legal benchmark. Combining legal benchmarks with spatial data, we created two scenarios for Art.68 effects, plus a baseline scenario. The first scenario considered a single legal benchmark, the 1965's FA (scenario "1965"), while the other included the 1989 Cerrado's protection Federal Law as a second benchmark (scenario "1965/89"). The baseline scenario did not include Art.68 effects. Scenario "1965" reduced LR deficits in 49% compared to the baseline scenario, waiving landholders from restoration or offsetting needs in 423 thousand hectares (kha) of NV. Scenario "1965/89" waved 507 kha of NV from restoration needs and represented a 59% reduction in LR deficit compared to the baseline scenario. The LR reduction by scenario "1965/89" assumed particular importance considering that the additional cutback was concentrated on Cerrado, an already very fragmented and impacted region. Together with reductions from other NVPL rules, the additional effects of Art. 68 unfolded great concerns about the role of LR as a tool for NV preservation on private land, threating governmental restoration commitments, and pointing that conservation command and control approaches should be complemented with incentive policies to achieve the desired and committed standards.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tavares,Paulo André, Brites,Alice Dantas, Sparovek,Gerd, Guidotti,Vinícius, Cerignoni,Felipe, Aguiar,Daniel, Metzger,Jean Paul, Rodrigues,Ricardo Ribeiro, Pinto,Luis Fernando Guedes, Mello,Kaline de, Molin,Paulo Guilherme
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP 2019
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032019000400501
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1676-06032019000400501
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1676-060320190004005012019-07-25Unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, BrazilTavares,Paulo AndréBrites,Alice DantasSparovek,GerdGuidotti,ViníciusCerignoni,FelipeAguiar,DanielMetzger,Jean PaulRodrigues,Ricardo RibeiroPinto,Luis Fernando GuedesMello,Kaline deMolin,Paulo Guilherme Native Vegetation Biodiversity Conservation New Forest Act São Paulo State Environmental Regularization Program Abstract: The Native Vegetation Protection Law - 2012 - (NVPL) is the main Brazilian regulation for protecting native vegetation (NV) on private land. The NVPL, currently in the implementation phase, reduced Legal Reserves (LR) requirements compared to its previous version, the 1965's Forest Act (FA), through several legal mechanisms. Among them, Article 68 (Art.68) exempts landholders from LR obligations if NV was converted without offending the legislation in place at the time of the conversion. The technical implementation of Art. 68 is controversial and its effects are still unknown. We developed a model to estimate the effects of Art.68 on LR using São Paulo State (Brazil) as case study. We analyzed former environmental laws to identify key periods in which NV preservation requirements had changed. After, we searched for past spatial data on NV cover with sufficient accuracy for each legal benchmark. Combining legal benchmarks with spatial data, we created two scenarios for Art.68 effects, plus a baseline scenario. The first scenario considered a single legal benchmark, the 1965's FA (scenario "1965"), while the other included the 1989 Cerrado's protection Federal Law as a second benchmark (scenario "1965/89"). The baseline scenario did not include Art.68 effects. Scenario "1965" reduced LR deficits in 49% compared to the baseline scenario, waiving landholders from restoration or offsetting needs in 423 thousand hectares (kha) of NV. Scenario "1965/89" waved 507 kha of NV from restoration needs and represented a 59% reduction in LR deficit compared to the baseline scenario. The LR reduction by scenario "1965/89" assumed particular importance considering that the additional cutback was concentrated on Cerrado, an already very fragmented and impacted region. Together with reductions from other NVPL rules, the additional effects of Art. 68 unfolded great concerns about the role of LR as a tool for NV preservation on private land, threating governmental restoration commitments, and pointing that conservation command and control approaches should be complemented with incentive policies to achieve the desired and committed standards.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESPBiota Neotropica v.19 n.4 20192019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/othertext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032019000400501en10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0658
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Tavares,Paulo André
Brites,Alice Dantas
Sparovek,Gerd
Guidotti,Vinícius
Cerignoni,Felipe
Aguiar,Daniel
Metzger,Jean Paul
Rodrigues,Ricardo Ribeiro
Pinto,Luis Fernando Guedes
Mello,Kaline de
Molin,Paulo Guilherme
spellingShingle Tavares,Paulo André
Brites,Alice Dantas
Sparovek,Gerd
Guidotti,Vinícius
Cerignoni,Felipe
Aguiar,Daniel
Metzger,Jean Paul
Rodrigues,Ricardo Ribeiro
Pinto,Luis Fernando Guedes
Mello,Kaline de
Molin,Paulo Guilherme
Unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, Brazil
author_facet Tavares,Paulo André
Brites,Alice Dantas
Sparovek,Gerd
Guidotti,Vinícius
Cerignoni,Felipe
Aguiar,Daniel
Metzger,Jean Paul
Rodrigues,Ricardo Ribeiro
Pinto,Luis Fernando Guedes
Mello,Kaline de
Molin,Paulo Guilherme
author_sort Tavares,Paulo André
title Unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, Brazil
title_short Unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, Brazil
title_full Unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, Brazil
title_fullStr Unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, Brazil
title_sort unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the native vegetation protection law on legal reserves, brazil
description Abstract: The Native Vegetation Protection Law - 2012 - (NVPL) is the main Brazilian regulation for protecting native vegetation (NV) on private land. The NVPL, currently in the implementation phase, reduced Legal Reserves (LR) requirements compared to its previous version, the 1965's Forest Act (FA), through several legal mechanisms. Among them, Article 68 (Art.68) exempts landholders from LR obligations if NV was converted without offending the legislation in place at the time of the conversion. The technical implementation of Art. 68 is controversial and its effects are still unknown. We developed a model to estimate the effects of Art.68 on LR using São Paulo State (Brazil) as case study. We analyzed former environmental laws to identify key periods in which NV preservation requirements had changed. After, we searched for past spatial data on NV cover with sufficient accuracy for each legal benchmark. Combining legal benchmarks with spatial data, we created two scenarios for Art.68 effects, plus a baseline scenario. The first scenario considered a single legal benchmark, the 1965's FA (scenario "1965"), while the other included the 1989 Cerrado's protection Federal Law as a second benchmark (scenario "1965/89"). The baseline scenario did not include Art.68 effects. Scenario "1965" reduced LR deficits in 49% compared to the baseline scenario, waiving landholders from restoration or offsetting needs in 423 thousand hectares (kha) of NV. Scenario "1965/89" waved 507 kha of NV from restoration needs and represented a 59% reduction in LR deficit compared to the baseline scenario. The LR reduction by scenario "1965/89" assumed particular importance considering that the additional cutback was concentrated on Cerrado, an already very fragmented and impacted region. Together with reductions from other NVPL rules, the additional effects of Art. 68 unfolded great concerns about the role of LR as a tool for NV preservation on private land, threating governmental restoration commitments, and pointing that conservation command and control approaches should be complemented with incentive policies to achieve the desired and committed standards.
publisher Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP
publishDate 2019
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032019000400501
work_keys_str_mv AT tavarespauloandre unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
AT britesalicedantas unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
AT sparovekgerd unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
AT guidottivinicius unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
AT cerignonifelipe unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
AT aguiardaniel unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
AT metzgerjeanpaul unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
AT rodriguesricardoribeiro unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
AT pintoluisfernandoguedes unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
AT mellokalinede unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
AT molinpauloguilherme unfoldingadditionalmassivecutbackeffectsofthenativevegetationprotectionlawonlegalreservesbrazil
_version_ 1756427349966979072