Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding alkalis on the fermentative pattern, aerobic stability and nutritive value of the sugarcane silage. A completely randomized design with 6 additives in two concentrations (1 or 2%), plus a control group, totalizing 13 treatments [(6×2)+1] with four replications, was used. The additives were sodium hydroxide (NaOH), limestone (CaCO3), urea (CO(NH2)2), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), quicklime (CaO) and hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2). The material was ensiled in 52 laboratory silos using plastic buckets with 12 L of capacity. Silos were opened 60 days after ensiling, when organic acids concentration, aerobic stability and chemical composition were determined. The Relative Biological Efficiency (RBE) was calculated by the slope ratio method, using the data obtained from ratio between desirable and undesirable silage products, according to the equation: D/U ratio = [lactic/(ethanol + acetic + butyric)]. All additives affected dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber contents and buffering capacity. Except for urea and quicklime, all additives increased the in vitro dry matter digestibility. In general, these additives altered the fermentative pattern of sugarcane silage, inhibiting alcoholic fermentation and improving lactic acid production. The additive that showed the best RBE in relation to sodium hydroxide (100%) was limestone (89.4%). The RBE values of urea, sodium bicarbonate and hydrated lime were 49.2%, 47.7% and 34.3%, respectively.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Borgatti,Laura Maria Oliveira, Pavan Neto,José, Conrado,André Luiz Veiga, Marino,Carolina Tobias, Meyer,Paula Marques, Rodrigues,Paulo Henrique Mazza
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia 2012
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000400003
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1516-35982012000400003
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1516-359820120004000032012-05-23Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensilingBorgatti,Laura Maria OliveiraPavan Neto,JoséConrado,André Luiz VeigaMarino,Carolina TobiasMeyer,Paula MarquesRodrigues,Paulo Henrique Mazza alkalis fermentation silage The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding alkalis on the fermentative pattern, aerobic stability and nutritive value of the sugarcane silage. A completely randomized design with 6 additives in two concentrations (1 or 2%), plus a control group, totalizing 13 treatments [(6×2)+1] with four replications, was used. The additives were sodium hydroxide (NaOH), limestone (CaCO3), urea (CO(NH2)2), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), quicklime (CaO) and hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2). The material was ensiled in 52 laboratory silos using plastic buckets with 12 L of capacity. Silos were opened 60 days after ensiling, when organic acids concentration, aerobic stability and chemical composition were determined. The Relative Biological Efficiency (RBE) was calculated by the slope ratio method, using the data obtained from ratio between desirable and undesirable silage products, according to the equation: D/U ratio = [lactic/(ethanol + acetic + butyric)]. All additives affected dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber contents and buffering capacity. Except for urea and quicklime, all additives increased the in vitro dry matter digestibility. In general, these additives altered the fermentative pattern of sugarcane silage, inhibiting alcoholic fermentation and improving lactic acid production. The additive that showed the best RBE in relation to sodium hydroxide (100%) was limestone (89.4%). The RBE values of urea, sodium bicarbonate and hydrated lime were 49.2%, 47.7% and 34.3%, respectively.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de ZootecniaRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.41 n.4 20122012-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000400003en10.1590/S1516-35982012000400003
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Borgatti,Laura Maria Oliveira
Pavan Neto,José
Conrado,André Luiz Veiga
Marino,Carolina Tobias
Meyer,Paula Marques
Rodrigues,Paulo Henrique Mazza
spellingShingle Borgatti,Laura Maria Oliveira
Pavan Neto,José
Conrado,André Luiz Veiga
Marino,Carolina Tobias
Meyer,Paula Marques
Rodrigues,Paulo Henrique Mazza
Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
author_facet Borgatti,Laura Maria Oliveira
Pavan Neto,José
Conrado,André Luiz Veiga
Marino,Carolina Tobias
Meyer,Paula Marques
Rodrigues,Paulo Henrique Mazza
author_sort Borgatti,Laura Maria Oliveira
title Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
title_short Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
title_full Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
title_fullStr Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
title_sort evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding alkalis on the fermentative pattern, aerobic stability and nutritive value of the sugarcane silage. A completely randomized design with 6 additives in two concentrations (1 or 2%), plus a control group, totalizing 13 treatments [(6×2)+1] with four replications, was used. The additives were sodium hydroxide (NaOH), limestone (CaCO3), urea (CO(NH2)2), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), quicklime (CaO) and hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2). The material was ensiled in 52 laboratory silos using plastic buckets with 12 L of capacity. Silos were opened 60 days after ensiling, when organic acids concentration, aerobic stability and chemical composition were determined. The Relative Biological Efficiency (RBE) was calculated by the slope ratio method, using the data obtained from ratio between desirable and undesirable silage products, according to the equation: D/U ratio = [lactic/(ethanol + acetic + butyric)]. All additives affected dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber contents and buffering capacity. Except for urea and quicklime, all additives increased the in vitro dry matter digestibility. In general, these additives altered the fermentative pattern of sugarcane silage, inhibiting alcoholic fermentation and improving lactic acid production. The additive that showed the best RBE in relation to sodium hydroxide (100%) was limestone (89.4%). The RBE values of urea, sodium bicarbonate and hydrated lime were 49.2%, 47.7% and 34.3%, respectively.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publishDate 2012
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000400003
work_keys_str_mv AT borgattilauramariaoliveira evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
AT pavannetojose evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
AT conradoandreluizveiga evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
AT marinocarolinatobias evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
AT meyerpaulamarques evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
AT rodriguespaulohenriquemazza evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
_version_ 1756422335389237248