Wheat or maize silage in feeding strategies for cows in small-scale dairy systems during the dry season

ABSTRACT The conservation of forage as silage allows its application during the dry season in dairy cattle feeding. The most commonly used forage for this purpose is maize (Zea mays L.), but due to the possible effects of climate change, the diversification of crops with shorter agronomic cycles as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) should be considered. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the chemical composition of silages, the productive response of dairy cows fed wheat and maize silage, as well as their feeding costs. Three treatments were evaluated with 9.8 kg DM cow-1 d-1 silage plus 4.6 kg DM cow-1 d-1 commercial concentrate each. Treatments were 100% wheat silage (WS), 50% wheat silage-50% maize silage (WMS), and 100% maize silage (MS). Six Holstein cows were used in groups of three randomly assigned to treatment sequence in a 3×3 Latin square design repeated twice. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments in silage chemical composition, except in NDF and ADF (P > 0.05). There were nonsignificant differences in animal variables (P > 0.05) with mean milk yield of 15.4 kg cow-1 d-1, 33.7 g kg-1 milkfat, 30.5 g kg-1 milk protein, 481.2 kg live weight and 2.1 body condition score. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in silage and total DM intake in the third experimental period (three periods, 14 d each one) with 8.1 and 12.7 kg DM cow-1 d-1, respectively. Although cost for wheat silage were higher than maize silage, all three treatments showed positive margins on feeding costs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Álvarez-García,Cloe D., Arriaga-Jordán,Carlos M., Estrada-Flores,Julieta G., López-González,Felipe
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA 2023
Online Access:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392023000400398
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0718-58392023000400398
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-583920230004003982023-08-06Wheat or maize silage in feeding strategies for cows in small-scale dairy systems during the dry seasonÁlvarez-García,Cloe D.Arriaga-Jordán,Carlos M.Estrada-Flores,Julieta G.López-González,Felipe Dairy production systems dry season silage wheat. ABSTRACT The conservation of forage as silage allows its application during the dry season in dairy cattle feeding. The most commonly used forage for this purpose is maize (Zea mays L.), but due to the possible effects of climate change, the diversification of crops with shorter agronomic cycles as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) should be considered. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the chemical composition of silages, the productive response of dairy cows fed wheat and maize silage, as well as their feeding costs. Three treatments were evaluated with 9.8 kg DM cow-1 d-1 silage plus 4.6 kg DM cow-1 d-1 commercial concentrate each. Treatments were 100% wheat silage (WS), 50% wheat silage-50% maize silage (WMS), and 100% maize silage (MS). Six Holstein cows were used in groups of three randomly assigned to treatment sequence in a 3×3 Latin square design repeated twice. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments in silage chemical composition, except in NDF and ADF (P > 0.05). There were nonsignificant differences in animal variables (P > 0.05) with mean milk yield of 15.4 kg cow-1 d-1, 33.7 g kg-1 milkfat, 30.5 g kg-1 milk protein, 481.2 kg live weight and 2.1 body condition score. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in silage and total DM intake in the third experimental period (three periods, 14 d each one) with 8.1 and 12.7 kg DM cow-1 d-1, respectively. Although cost for wheat silage were higher than maize silage, all three treatments showed positive margins on feeding costs.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIAChilean journal of agricultural research v.83 n.4 20232023-08-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392023000400398en10.4067/S0718-58392023000400398
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Chile
countrycode CL
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-cl
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Álvarez-García,Cloe D.
Arriaga-Jordán,Carlos M.
Estrada-Flores,Julieta G.
López-González,Felipe
spellingShingle Álvarez-García,Cloe D.
Arriaga-Jordán,Carlos M.
Estrada-Flores,Julieta G.
López-González,Felipe
Wheat or maize silage in feeding strategies for cows in small-scale dairy systems during the dry season
author_facet Álvarez-García,Cloe D.
Arriaga-Jordán,Carlos M.
Estrada-Flores,Julieta G.
López-González,Felipe
author_sort Álvarez-García,Cloe D.
title Wheat or maize silage in feeding strategies for cows in small-scale dairy systems during the dry season
title_short Wheat or maize silage in feeding strategies for cows in small-scale dairy systems during the dry season
title_full Wheat or maize silage in feeding strategies for cows in small-scale dairy systems during the dry season
title_fullStr Wheat or maize silage in feeding strategies for cows in small-scale dairy systems during the dry season
title_full_unstemmed Wheat or maize silage in feeding strategies for cows in small-scale dairy systems during the dry season
title_sort wheat or maize silage in feeding strategies for cows in small-scale dairy systems during the dry season
description ABSTRACT The conservation of forage as silage allows its application during the dry season in dairy cattle feeding. The most commonly used forage for this purpose is maize (Zea mays L.), but due to the possible effects of climate change, the diversification of crops with shorter agronomic cycles as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) should be considered. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the chemical composition of silages, the productive response of dairy cows fed wheat and maize silage, as well as their feeding costs. Three treatments were evaluated with 9.8 kg DM cow-1 d-1 silage plus 4.6 kg DM cow-1 d-1 commercial concentrate each. Treatments were 100% wheat silage (WS), 50% wheat silage-50% maize silage (WMS), and 100% maize silage (MS). Six Holstein cows were used in groups of three randomly assigned to treatment sequence in a 3×3 Latin square design repeated twice. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments in silage chemical composition, except in NDF and ADF (P > 0.05). There were nonsignificant differences in animal variables (P > 0.05) with mean milk yield of 15.4 kg cow-1 d-1, 33.7 g kg-1 milkfat, 30.5 g kg-1 milk protein, 481.2 kg live weight and 2.1 body condition score. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in silage and total DM intake in the third experimental period (three periods, 14 d each one) with 8.1 and 12.7 kg DM cow-1 d-1, respectively. Although cost for wheat silage were higher than maize silage, all three treatments showed positive margins on feeding costs.
publisher Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA
publishDate 2023
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392023000400398
work_keys_str_mv AT alvarezgarciacloed wheatormaizesilageinfeedingstrategiesforcowsinsmallscaledairysystemsduringthedryseason
AT arriagajordancarlosm wheatormaizesilageinfeedingstrategiesforcowsinsmallscaledairysystemsduringthedryseason
AT estradafloresjulietag wheatormaizesilageinfeedingstrategiesforcowsinsmallscaledairysystemsduringthedryseason
AT lopezgonzalezfelipe wheatormaizesilageinfeedingstrategiesforcowsinsmallscaledairysystemsduringthedryseason
_version_ 1774400939715723264