Body fat percentage comparisons between four methods in young football players: are they comparable?

Introduction: Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and anthropometry are four body composition methods that have been frequently used for the assessment of body fat percentage (%BF) in athletes. However, the agreement between these methods has not been studied yet in adolescent football players. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare %BF calculated by DXA, ADP, BIA and anthropometry in 92 participants. Methods: Sixty-four males (13.4 ± 0.6 years of age) and 28 females (13.4 ± 0.6 years) participated in this study. %BF was measured with four methods: DXA, ADP, BIA, and anthropometry. ADP %BF was calculated by using Siri's equation. The equation proposed by Slaughter et al. was used to calculate %BF by anthropometry. Paired t-test was used to compare %BF means. The heteroscedasticity was calculated by Bland-Altman analyses. Results and conclusions: Both in males and females, DXA, ADP, BIA and Slaughter et al. equation demonstrated significant %BF differences when compared to each other (p < 0.05); 95% limits of agreements ranged from 5.13 to 15.09% points. Only BIA showed heteroscedasticity compared to the other methods in both genders (p < 0.05). Although DXA, ADP, BIA, and anthropometry have been used in the scientific literature in order to assess %BF in adolescent football players, these results demonstrate that these body composition methods are not interchangeable in this population.

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Lozano Berges,Gabriel, Matute Llorente,Ángel, Gómez Bruton,Alejandro, González Agüero,Alejandro, Vicente Rodrígue,German, Casajús,José Antonio
Formato: Digital revista
Idioma:English
Publicado em: Grupo Arán 2017
Acesso em linha:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112017000500015
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
id oai:scielo:S0212-16112017000500015
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0212-161120170005000152018-04-12Body fat percentage comparisons between four methods in young football players: are they comparable?Lozano Berges,GabrielMatute Llorente,ÁngelGómez Bruton,AlejandroGonzález Agüero,AlejandroVicente Rodrígue,GermanCasajús,José Antonio Soccer Body composition Absorptiometry Photon Skinfold thickness Introduction: Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and anthropometry are four body composition methods that have been frequently used for the assessment of body fat percentage (%BF) in athletes. However, the agreement between these methods has not been studied yet in adolescent football players. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare %BF calculated by DXA, ADP, BIA and anthropometry in 92 participants. Methods: Sixty-four males (13.4 ± 0.6 years of age) and 28 females (13.4 ± 0.6 years) participated in this study. %BF was measured with four methods: DXA, ADP, BIA, and anthropometry. ADP %BF was calculated by using Siri's equation. The equation proposed by Slaughter et al. was used to calculate %BF by anthropometry. Paired t-test was used to compare %BF means. The heteroscedasticity was calculated by Bland-Altman analyses. Results and conclusions: Both in males and females, DXA, ADP, BIA and Slaughter et al. equation demonstrated significant %BF differences when compared to each other (p < 0.05); 95% limits of agreements ranged from 5.13 to 15.09% points. Only BIA showed heteroscedasticity compared to the other methods in both genders (p < 0.05). Although DXA, ADP, BIA, and anthropometry have been used in the scientific literature in order to assess %BF in adolescent football players, these results demonstrate that these body composition methods are not interchangeable in this population.Grupo AránNutrición Hospitalaria v.34 n.5 20172017-10-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112017000500015en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Lozano Berges,Gabriel
Matute Llorente,Ángel
Gómez Bruton,Alejandro
González Agüero,Alejandro
Vicente Rodrígue,German
Casajús,José Antonio
spellingShingle Lozano Berges,Gabriel
Matute Llorente,Ángel
Gómez Bruton,Alejandro
González Agüero,Alejandro
Vicente Rodrígue,German
Casajús,José Antonio
Body fat percentage comparisons between four methods in young football players: are they comparable?
author_facet Lozano Berges,Gabriel
Matute Llorente,Ángel
Gómez Bruton,Alejandro
González Agüero,Alejandro
Vicente Rodrígue,German
Casajús,José Antonio
author_sort Lozano Berges,Gabriel
title Body fat percentage comparisons between four methods in young football players: are they comparable?
title_short Body fat percentage comparisons between four methods in young football players: are they comparable?
title_full Body fat percentage comparisons between four methods in young football players: are they comparable?
title_fullStr Body fat percentage comparisons between four methods in young football players: are they comparable?
title_full_unstemmed Body fat percentage comparisons between four methods in young football players: are they comparable?
title_sort body fat percentage comparisons between four methods in young football players: are they comparable?
description Introduction: Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and anthropometry are four body composition methods that have been frequently used for the assessment of body fat percentage (%BF) in athletes. However, the agreement between these methods has not been studied yet in adolescent football players. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare %BF calculated by DXA, ADP, BIA and anthropometry in 92 participants. Methods: Sixty-four males (13.4 ± 0.6 years of age) and 28 females (13.4 ± 0.6 years) participated in this study. %BF was measured with four methods: DXA, ADP, BIA, and anthropometry. ADP %BF was calculated by using Siri's equation. The equation proposed by Slaughter et al. was used to calculate %BF by anthropometry. Paired t-test was used to compare %BF means. The heteroscedasticity was calculated by Bland-Altman analyses. Results and conclusions: Both in males and females, DXA, ADP, BIA and Slaughter et al. equation demonstrated significant %BF differences when compared to each other (p < 0.05); 95% limits of agreements ranged from 5.13 to 15.09% points. Only BIA showed heteroscedasticity compared to the other methods in both genders (p < 0.05). Although DXA, ADP, BIA, and anthropometry have been used in the scientific literature in order to assess %BF in adolescent football players, these results demonstrate that these body composition methods are not interchangeable in this population.
publisher Grupo Arán
publishDate 2017
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112017000500015
work_keys_str_mv AT lozanobergesgabriel bodyfatpercentagecomparisonsbetweenfourmethodsinyoungfootballplayersaretheycomparable
AT matutellorenteangel bodyfatpercentagecomparisonsbetweenfourmethodsinyoungfootballplayersaretheycomparable
AT gomezbrutonalejandro bodyfatpercentagecomparisonsbetweenfourmethodsinyoungfootballplayersaretheycomparable
AT gonzalezagueroalejandro bodyfatpercentagecomparisonsbetweenfourmethodsinyoungfootballplayersaretheycomparable
AT vicenterodriguegerman bodyfatpercentagecomparisonsbetweenfourmethodsinyoungfootballplayersaretheycomparable
AT casajusjoseantonio bodyfatpercentagecomparisonsbetweenfourmethodsinyoungfootballplayersaretheycomparable
_version_ 1755936964711809024