GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer counts comparison during standardized activities in young, adults and older adults
Objective: The present study aims to compare the vertical counts registered by GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer. Methods: Treadmill activities, repeated sit-stands and rest were completed by 31 young, 31 adults and 35 older adults while wearing the accelerometers (GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer) on their right hips. Independent sample t-test analyses were performed to determine differences between counts in each age group and activities along with the Bland & Altman analysis to determine the degree of agreement. In order to determine the correction factor for the ActiTrainer counts, the linear regression forward analysis was used to minimize differences with the GT3X and the GT1M counts. Results: Differences among ActiTrainer, GT1M, and GT3X were revealed in all activities except in rest. The counts for ActiTrainer were significantly lower than those of GT3X and GT1M. The correction factor for ActiTrainer with GT1M (GT1M counts = 3185.564 + 649.647; *ActiTrainer counts - 36.163; *weight [kg] - 7.545 *age [years] r = 0.864; r² = 0.746; r² corrected = 0.745; SEE = 1451) and GT3X (GT3X counts = 3501.977 + 705.662 *ActiTrainer counts - 40.523 *weight [kg] - 11.864 *age [years] r = 0.901; r² = 0.812; r² corrected = 0.811; SEE = 310.160) reduced these differences. Conclusion: The GT1M and GT3X vertical counts may be compared. However, a correction factor to decrease differences to compare ActiTrainer counts with those of GT1M or GT3X counts must be applied.
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Grupo Arán
2016
|
Online Access: | http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112016000300028 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0212-16112016000300028 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0212-161120160003000282016-07-27GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer counts comparison during standardized activities in young, adults and older adultsSantos-Lozano,AlejandroSantín-Medeiros,FernandaCristi-Montero,CarlosJaén-Jiménez,RaúlCasajús,José AntonioGaratachea,Nuria Activity monitor Counts Accelerometer Accelerometry Objective: The present study aims to compare the vertical counts registered by GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer. Methods: Treadmill activities, repeated sit-stands and rest were completed by 31 young, 31 adults and 35 older adults while wearing the accelerometers (GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer) on their right hips. Independent sample t-test analyses were performed to determine differences between counts in each age group and activities along with the Bland & Altman analysis to determine the degree of agreement. In order to determine the correction factor for the ActiTrainer counts, the linear regression forward analysis was used to minimize differences with the GT3X and the GT1M counts. Results: Differences among ActiTrainer, GT1M, and GT3X were revealed in all activities except in rest. The counts for ActiTrainer were significantly lower than those of GT3X and GT1M. The correction factor for ActiTrainer with GT1M (GT1M counts = 3185.564 + 649.647; *ActiTrainer counts - 36.163; *weight [kg] - 7.545 *age [years] r = 0.864; r² = 0.746; r² corrected = 0.745; SEE = 1451) and GT3X (GT3X counts = 3501.977 + 705.662 *ActiTrainer counts - 40.523 *weight [kg] - 11.864 *age [years] r = 0.901; r² = 0.812; r² corrected = 0.811; SEE = 310.160) reduced these differences. Conclusion: The GT1M and GT3X vertical counts may be compared. However, a correction factor to decrease differences to compare ActiTrainer counts with those of GT1M or GT3X counts must be applied.Grupo AránNutrición Hospitalaria v.33 n.3 20162016-06-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112016000300028en |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
España |
countrycode |
ES |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-es |
tag |
revista |
region |
Europa del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Santos-Lozano,Alejandro Santín-Medeiros,Fernanda Cristi-Montero,Carlos Jaén-Jiménez,Raúl Casajús,José Antonio Garatachea,Nuria |
spellingShingle |
Santos-Lozano,Alejandro Santín-Medeiros,Fernanda Cristi-Montero,Carlos Jaén-Jiménez,Raúl Casajús,José Antonio Garatachea,Nuria GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer counts comparison during standardized activities in young, adults and older adults |
author_facet |
Santos-Lozano,Alejandro Santín-Medeiros,Fernanda Cristi-Montero,Carlos Jaén-Jiménez,Raúl Casajús,José Antonio Garatachea,Nuria |
author_sort |
Santos-Lozano,Alejandro |
title |
GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer counts comparison during standardized activities in young, adults and older adults |
title_short |
GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer counts comparison during standardized activities in young, adults and older adults |
title_full |
GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer counts comparison during standardized activities in young, adults and older adults |
title_fullStr |
GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer counts comparison during standardized activities in young, adults and older adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer counts comparison during standardized activities in young, adults and older adults |
title_sort |
gt1m, gt3x and actitrainer counts comparison during standardized activities in young, adults and older adults |
description |
Objective: The present study aims to compare the vertical counts registered by GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer. Methods: Treadmill activities, repeated sit-stands and rest were completed by 31 young, 31 adults and 35 older adults while wearing the accelerometers (GT1M, GT3X and ActiTrainer) on their right hips. Independent sample t-test analyses were performed to determine differences between counts in each age group and activities along with the Bland & Altman analysis to determine the degree of agreement. In order to determine the correction factor for the ActiTrainer counts, the linear regression forward analysis was used to minimize differences with the GT3X and the GT1M counts. Results: Differences among ActiTrainer, GT1M, and GT3X were revealed in all activities except in rest. The counts for ActiTrainer were significantly lower than those of GT3X and GT1M. The correction factor for ActiTrainer with GT1M (GT1M counts = 3185.564 + 649.647; *ActiTrainer counts - 36.163; *weight [kg] - 7.545 *age [years] r = 0.864; r² = 0.746; r² corrected = 0.745; SEE = 1451) and GT3X (GT3X counts = 3501.977 + 705.662 *ActiTrainer counts - 40.523 *weight [kg] - 11.864 *age [years] r = 0.901; r² = 0.812; r² corrected = 0.811; SEE = 310.160) reduced these differences. Conclusion: The GT1M and GT3X vertical counts may be compared. However, a correction factor to decrease differences to compare ActiTrainer counts with those of GT1M or GT3X counts must be applied. |
publisher |
Grupo Arán |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112016000300028 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT santoslozanoalejandro gt1mgt3xandactitrainercountscomparisonduringstandardizedactivitiesinyoungadultsandolderadults AT santinmedeirosfernanda gt1mgt3xandactitrainercountscomparisonduringstandardizedactivitiesinyoungadultsandolderadults AT cristimonterocarlos gt1mgt3xandactitrainercountscomparisonduringstandardizedactivitiesinyoungadultsandolderadults AT jaenjimenezraul gt1mgt3xandactitrainercountscomparisonduringstandardizedactivitiesinyoungadultsandolderadults AT casajusjoseantonio gt1mgt3xandactitrainercountscomparisonduringstandardizedactivitiesinyoungadultsandolderadults AT garatacheanuria gt1mgt3xandactitrainercountscomparisonduringstandardizedactivitiesinyoungadultsandolderadults |
_version_ |
1755936920719851520 |