SAMPLING PROCESSES FOR Carapa guianensis AUBL. IN THE AMAZON

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to analyze the adaptive cluster sampling (ACS), simple random sampling (SRS) and systematic sampling (SS) processes to obtain the number of ha-1 trees of Carapa guianensis Aubl. in the Amazon. The data were obtained through 100% inventory and sampling simulations, considering a DBH ≥ 25 cm, a sampling intensity of 4%, a maximum error of 10% and plots of 0.09, 0.16 and 0.25 ha. The last two sizes were only used to analyze their effect on the ACS estimators. The processes were evaluated for accuracy, precision (E%) and confidence interval (CI), while the mean ha-1 of the processes were compared with that of the 100% inventory by the Z test. The ACS process showed no significant difference between its average ha-1 trees and the 100% inventory, and it was also the most accurate and the only one whose CI was true. However, it presented a final sample intensity 3.6 times greater than the simple and systematic random samplings, in addition to E% above 10%, which makes it unacceptable, legally, and economically unfeasible. The other processes had densities significantly higher than the 100% inventory, with sample intensities lower than ACS and E% lower than 10%, making them legally viable. The use of larger plots in the ACS implies larger clusters and a greater tendency to underestimate the number of trees, resulting in larger sample errors and less accuracy.

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Vieira,Diego dos Santos, Oliveira,Marcio Leles Romarco de, Gama,João Ricardo Vasconcellos, Oliveira,Bruno Lafetá, Rego,Anna Karyne Costa, Bezerra,Talita Godinho
Formato: Digital revista
Idioma:English
Publicado em: UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras 2018
Acesso em linha:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-77602018000300169
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
id oai:scielo:S0104-77602018000300169
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0104-776020180003001692019-01-31SAMPLING PROCESSES FOR Carapa guianensis AUBL. IN THE AMAZONVieira,Diego dos SantosOliveira,Marcio Leles Romarco deGama,João Ricardo VasconcellosOliveira,Bruno LafetáRego,Anna Karyne CostaBezerra,Talita Godinho Adaptive cluster sampling Simple random sampling Systematic samplingn ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to analyze the adaptive cluster sampling (ACS), simple random sampling (SRS) and systematic sampling (SS) processes to obtain the number of ha-1 trees of Carapa guianensis Aubl. in the Amazon. The data were obtained through 100% inventory and sampling simulations, considering a DBH ≥ 25 cm, a sampling intensity of 4%, a maximum error of 10% and plots of 0.09, 0.16 and 0.25 ha. The last two sizes were only used to analyze their effect on the ACS estimators. The processes were evaluated for accuracy, precision (E%) and confidence interval (CI), while the mean ha-1 of the processes were compared with that of the 100% inventory by the Z test. The ACS process showed no significant difference between its average ha-1 trees and the 100% inventory, and it was also the most accurate and the only one whose CI was true. However, it presented a final sample intensity 3.6 times greater than the simple and systematic random samplings, in addition to E% above 10%, which makes it unacceptable, legally, and economically unfeasible. The other processes had densities significantly higher than the 100% inventory, with sample intensities lower than ACS and E% lower than 10%, making them legally viable. The use of larger plots in the ACS implies larger clusters and a greater tendency to underestimate the number of trees, resulting in larger sample errors and less accuracy.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUFLA - Universidade Federal de LavrasCERNE v.24 n.3 20182018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-77602018000300169en10.1590/01047760201824032514
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Vieira,Diego dos Santos
Oliveira,Marcio Leles Romarco de
Gama,João Ricardo Vasconcellos
Oliveira,Bruno Lafetá
Rego,Anna Karyne Costa
Bezerra,Talita Godinho
spellingShingle Vieira,Diego dos Santos
Oliveira,Marcio Leles Romarco de
Gama,João Ricardo Vasconcellos
Oliveira,Bruno Lafetá
Rego,Anna Karyne Costa
Bezerra,Talita Godinho
SAMPLING PROCESSES FOR Carapa guianensis AUBL. IN THE AMAZON
author_facet Vieira,Diego dos Santos
Oliveira,Marcio Leles Romarco de
Gama,João Ricardo Vasconcellos
Oliveira,Bruno Lafetá
Rego,Anna Karyne Costa
Bezerra,Talita Godinho
author_sort Vieira,Diego dos Santos
title SAMPLING PROCESSES FOR Carapa guianensis AUBL. IN THE AMAZON
title_short SAMPLING PROCESSES FOR Carapa guianensis AUBL. IN THE AMAZON
title_full SAMPLING PROCESSES FOR Carapa guianensis AUBL. IN THE AMAZON
title_fullStr SAMPLING PROCESSES FOR Carapa guianensis AUBL. IN THE AMAZON
title_full_unstemmed SAMPLING PROCESSES FOR Carapa guianensis AUBL. IN THE AMAZON
title_sort sampling processes for carapa guianensis aubl. in the amazon
description ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to analyze the adaptive cluster sampling (ACS), simple random sampling (SRS) and systematic sampling (SS) processes to obtain the number of ha-1 trees of Carapa guianensis Aubl. in the Amazon. The data were obtained through 100% inventory and sampling simulations, considering a DBH ≥ 25 cm, a sampling intensity of 4%, a maximum error of 10% and plots of 0.09, 0.16 and 0.25 ha. The last two sizes were only used to analyze their effect on the ACS estimators. The processes were evaluated for accuracy, precision (E%) and confidence interval (CI), while the mean ha-1 of the processes were compared with that of the 100% inventory by the Z test. The ACS process showed no significant difference between its average ha-1 trees and the 100% inventory, and it was also the most accurate and the only one whose CI was true. However, it presented a final sample intensity 3.6 times greater than the simple and systematic random samplings, in addition to E% above 10%, which makes it unacceptable, legally, and economically unfeasible. The other processes had densities significantly higher than the 100% inventory, with sample intensities lower than ACS and E% lower than 10%, making them legally viable. The use of larger plots in the ACS implies larger clusters and a greater tendency to underestimate the number of trees, resulting in larger sample errors and less accuracy.
publisher UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras
publishDate 2018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-77602018000300169
work_keys_str_mv AT vieiradiegodossantos samplingprocessesforcarapaguianensisaublintheamazon
AT oliveiramarciolelesromarcode samplingprocessesforcarapaguianensisaublintheamazon
AT gamajoaoricardovasconcellos samplingprocessesforcarapaguianensisaublintheamazon
AT oliveirabrunolafeta samplingprocessesforcarapaguianensisaublintheamazon
AT regoannakarynecosta samplingprocessesforcarapaguianensisaublintheamazon
AT bezerratalitagodinho samplingprocessesforcarapaguianensisaublintheamazon
_version_ 1756411591521206272