Should fetal growth be a matter of concern in isolated single umbilical artery?

Objective: To examine birth weight in pregnancies with isolated single umbilical artery (ISUA). Methods: Case control study with retrospective review of 131 singleton pregnancies with isolated single umbilical artery diagnosed before birth. Control group consisted of 730 singleton pregnancies recruited prospectively, that had histological confirmation of a 3 vessels cord. Pregnancies were classified as uncomplicated or high-risk according to the presence of diseases that increase the risk of placental insufficiency during pregnancy. Mean birth weight and frequency of low birth weight (< 2.500 g), very low birth weight (< 1.500 g) and fetal growth restriction below the 5th and 10th centiles were compared between groups. Results: Mean birth weight difference between ISUA (n=131, 2840±701g) and control (n=730, 2.983 ± 671g) pregnancies was 143g (95% CI= 17-269; p=0.04) and birth weight below the 5thcentile was significantly more common in ISUA group [28/131 (21.4%) versus 99/730 (13.6%), p=0.02]. When only uncomplicated pregnancies were considered in both groups, no birth weight differences were observed. Amongst high-risk subgroups, birth weight below the 5th centile remained significantly more common in ISUA compared to control pregnancies [10/35 (28.6%) versus 53/377 (14.1%), p=0.04]. Conclusion: Isolated single umbilical artery does not increase the risk of fetal growth restriction in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caldas,Lorena Mesquita, Liao,Adolfo, Carvalho,Mário Henrique, Francisco,Rossana Pulcineli Vieira, Zugaib,Marcelo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Médica Brasileira 2014
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000200125
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0104-42302014000200125
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0104-423020140002001252015-01-09Should fetal growth be a matter of concern in isolated single umbilical artery?Caldas,Lorena MesquitaLiao,AdolfoCarvalho,Mário HenriqueFrancisco,Rossana Pulcineli VieiraZugaib,Marcelo single umbilical artery fetal growth retardation birth weight ultrasonography Objective: To examine birth weight in pregnancies with isolated single umbilical artery (ISUA). Methods: Case control study with retrospective review of 131 singleton pregnancies with isolated single umbilical artery diagnosed before birth. Control group consisted of 730 singleton pregnancies recruited prospectively, that had histological confirmation of a 3 vessels cord. Pregnancies were classified as uncomplicated or high-risk according to the presence of diseases that increase the risk of placental insufficiency during pregnancy. Mean birth weight and frequency of low birth weight (< 2.500 g), very low birth weight (< 1.500 g) and fetal growth restriction below the 5th and 10th centiles were compared between groups. Results: Mean birth weight difference between ISUA (n=131, 2840±701g) and control (n=730, 2.983 ± 671g) pregnancies was 143g (95% CI= 17-269; p=0.04) and birth weight below the 5thcentile was significantly more common in ISUA group [28/131 (21.4%) versus 99/730 (13.6%), p=0.02]. When only uncomplicated pregnancies were considered in both groups, no birth weight differences were observed. Amongst high-risk subgroups, birth weight below the 5th centile remained significantly more common in ISUA compared to control pregnancies [10/35 (28.6%) versus 53/377 (14.1%), p=0.04]. Conclusion: Isolated single umbilical artery does not increase the risk of fetal growth restriction in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Médica BrasileiraRevista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.60 n.2 20142014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000200125en10.1590/1806-9282.60.02.009
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Caldas,Lorena Mesquita
Liao,Adolfo
Carvalho,Mário Henrique
Francisco,Rossana Pulcineli Vieira
Zugaib,Marcelo
spellingShingle Caldas,Lorena Mesquita
Liao,Adolfo
Carvalho,Mário Henrique
Francisco,Rossana Pulcineli Vieira
Zugaib,Marcelo
Should fetal growth be a matter of concern in isolated single umbilical artery?
author_facet Caldas,Lorena Mesquita
Liao,Adolfo
Carvalho,Mário Henrique
Francisco,Rossana Pulcineli Vieira
Zugaib,Marcelo
author_sort Caldas,Lorena Mesquita
title Should fetal growth be a matter of concern in isolated single umbilical artery?
title_short Should fetal growth be a matter of concern in isolated single umbilical artery?
title_full Should fetal growth be a matter of concern in isolated single umbilical artery?
title_fullStr Should fetal growth be a matter of concern in isolated single umbilical artery?
title_full_unstemmed Should fetal growth be a matter of concern in isolated single umbilical artery?
title_sort should fetal growth be a matter of concern in isolated single umbilical artery?
description Objective: To examine birth weight in pregnancies with isolated single umbilical artery (ISUA). Methods: Case control study with retrospective review of 131 singleton pregnancies with isolated single umbilical artery diagnosed before birth. Control group consisted of 730 singleton pregnancies recruited prospectively, that had histological confirmation of a 3 vessels cord. Pregnancies were classified as uncomplicated or high-risk according to the presence of diseases that increase the risk of placental insufficiency during pregnancy. Mean birth weight and frequency of low birth weight (< 2.500 g), very low birth weight (< 1.500 g) and fetal growth restriction below the 5th and 10th centiles were compared between groups. Results: Mean birth weight difference between ISUA (n=131, 2840±701g) and control (n=730, 2.983 ± 671g) pregnancies was 143g (95% CI= 17-269; p=0.04) and birth weight below the 5thcentile was significantly more common in ISUA group [28/131 (21.4%) versus 99/730 (13.6%), p=0.02]. When only uncomplicated pregnancies were considered in both groups, no birth weight differences were observed. Amongst high-risk subgroups, birth weight below the 5th centile remained significantly more common in ISUA compared to control pregnancies [10/35 (28.6%) versus 53/377 (14.1%), p=0.04]. Conclusion: Isolated single umbilical artery does not increase the risk of fetal growth restriction in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies.
publisher Associação Médica Brasileira
publishDate 2014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000200125
work_keys_str_mv AT caldaslorenamesquita shouldfetalgrowthbeamatterofconcerninisolatedsingleumbilicalartery
AT liaoadolfo shouldfetalgrowthbeamatterofconcerninisolatedsingleumbilicalartery
AT carvalhomariohenrique shouldfetalgrowthbeamatterofconcerninisolatedsingleumbilicalartery
AT franciscorossanapulcinelivieira shouldfetalgrowthbeamatterofconcerninisolatedsingleumbilicalartery
AT zugaibmarcelo shouldfetalgrowthbeamatterofconcerninisolatedsingleumbilicalartery
_version_ 1756409908912193536