Comparison between textured silicone implants and those bonded with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in rats

PURPOSE: Comparison of the inflammatory reaction promoted by textured silicone implants and that caused by the implant bonded with e-ptfe. METHODS: One-hundred and fifty rats were divided into three equal groups (control, silicone, and bonded e-ptfe). These groups were subdivided into five groups, according to the second operation, i.e., 7,30,60,90 and 180 days. Histology of the peri-implant tissue was analyzed by morphometry with blood count (neutrophilos, lymphocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts and capillaries). RESULTS: Comparison of subgroups 7,30,60,90, 180 days: - neutrophils: silicone: > in subgroup 7 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroups 7 and 30 days; - lymphocytes: silicone: > in subgroup 7 and 180 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroup 180 days; - macrophages: silicone: > in subgroup 7 and 60 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroup 7,30 and 60 days; - fibroblasts: silicone: > in subgroup 30 and 60 days;- vascular volume: silicone: in subgroup 7, 60 and 90 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroup 7 days. Comparison of groups: neutrophils : 7 days: > in silicone and bonded e-ptfe; 30 days: > in bonded e-ptfe; - lymphocytes: - 7,30,90 and 180 days: in the control; macrophages: - 7,30 and 60 days: > in silicone & bonded e-ptfe; 180 days > in silicone; fibroblasts: - 7,30 and 90 days: > in silicone and bonded e-ptfe; 180 days: > in bonded e-ptfe; vascular volume 7,60,90 and 180 days: > in silicone and bonded e-ptfe; 30 days: > in bonded e-ptfe. CONCLUSIONS: The acute stage of the inflammatory response was more severe and irregular in the silicone implant; both the silicone implant and the silicone bonded with e-ptfe promoted chronic inflammatory reaction and weak foreign body inflammatory response. These reactions were greater in the silicone implant group.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haddad Filho,Douglas, Zveibel,Deborah K., Alonso,Nivaldo, Gemperli,Rolf
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2007
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502007000300006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-86502007000300006
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-865020070003000062007-05-24Comparison between textured silicone implants and those bonded with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in ratsHaddad Filho,DouglasZveibel,Deborah K.Alonso,NivaldoGemperli,Rolf Silicone Elastomers Silicone Gels Polytetrafluoroethylene Rats, Wistar PURPOSE: Comparison of the inflammatory reaction promoted by textured silicone implants and that caused by the implant bonded with e-ptfe. METHODS: One-hundred and fifty rats were divided into three equal groups (control, silicone, and bonded e-ptfe). These groups were subdivided into five groups, according to the second operation, i.e., 7,30,60,90 and 180 days. Histology of the peri-implant tissue was analyzed by morphometry with blood count (neutrophilos, lymphocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts and capillaries). RESULTS: Comparison of subgroups 7,30,60,90, 180 days: - neutrophils: silicone: > in subgroup 7 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroups 7 and 30 days; - lymphocytes: silicone: > in subgroup 7 and 180 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroup 180 days; - macrophages: silicone: > in subgroup 7 and 60 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroup 7,30 and 60 days; - fibroblasts: silicone: > in subgroup 30 and 60 days;- vascular volume: silicone: in subgroup 7, 60 and 90 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroup 7 days. Comparison of groups: neutrophils : 7 days: > in silicone and bonded e-ptfe; 30 days: > in bonded e-ptfe; - lymphocytes: - 7,30,90 and 180 days: in the control; macrophages: - 7,30 and 60 days: > in silicone & bonded e-ptfe; 180 days > in silicone; fibroblasts: - 7,30 and 90 days: > in silicone and bonded e-ptfe; 180 days: > in bonded e-ptfe; vascular volume 7,60,90 and 180 days: > in silicone and bonded e-ptfe; 30 days: > in bonded e-ptfe. CONCLUSIONS: The acute stage of the inflammatory response was more severe and irregular in the silicone implant; both the silicone implant and the silicone bonded with e-ptfe promoted chronic inflammatory reaction and weak foreign body inflammatory response. These reactions were greater in the silicone implant group.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em CirurgiaActa Cirúrgica Brasileira v.22 n.3 20072007-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502007000300006en10.1590/S0102-86502007000300006
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Haddad Filho,Douglas
Zveibel,Deborah K.
Alonso,Nivaldo
Gemperli,Rolf
spellingShingle Haddad Filho,Douglas
Zveibel,Deborah K.
Alonso,Nivaldo
Gemperli,Rolf
Comparison between textured silicone implants and those bonded with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in rats
author_facet Haddad Filho,Douglas
Zveibel,Deborah K.
Alonso,Nivaldo
Gemperli,Rolf
author_sort Haddad Filho,Douglas
title Comparison between textured silicone implants and those bonded with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in rats
title_short Comparison between textured silicone implants and those bonded with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in rats
title_full Comparison between textured silicone implants and those bonded with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in rats
title_fullStr Comparison between textured silicone implants and those bonded with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in rats
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between textured silicone implants and those bonded with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in rats
title_sort comparison between textured silicone implants and those bonded with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in rats
description PURPOSE: Comparison of the inflammatory reaction promoted by textured silicone implants and that caused by the implant bonded with e-ptfe. METHODS: One-hundred and fifty rats were divided into three equal groups (control, silicone, and bonded e-ptfe). These groups were subdivided into five groups, according to the second operation, i.e., 7,30,60,90 and 180 days. Histology of the peri-implant tissue was analyzed by morphometry with blood count (neutrophilos, lymphocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts and capillaries). RESULTS: Comparison of subgroups 7,30,60,90, 180 days: - neutrophils: silicone: > in subgroup 7 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroups 7 and 30 days; - lymphocytes: silicone: > in subgroup 7 and 180 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroup 180 days; - macrophages: silicone: > in subgroup 7 and 60 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroup 7,30 and 60 days; - fibroblasts: silicone: > in subgroup 30 and 60 days;- vascular volume: silicone: in subgroup 7, 60 and 90 days; bonded e-ptfe: > in subgroup 7 days. Comparison of groups: neutrophils : 7 days: > in silicone and bonded e-ptfe; 30 days: > in bonded e-ptfe; - lymphocytes: - 7,30,90 and 180 days: in the control; macrophages: - 7,30 and 60 days: > in silicone & bonded e-ptfe; 180 days > in silicone; fibroblasts: - 7,30 and 90 days: > in silicone and bonded e-ptfe; 180 days: > in bonded e-ptfe; vascular volume 7,60,90 and 180 days: > in silicone and bonded e-ptfe; 30 days: > in bonded e-ptfe. CONCLUSIONS: The acute stage of the inflammatory response was more severe and irregular in the silicone implant; both the silicone implant and the silicone bonded with e-ptfe promoted chronic inflammatory reaction and weak foreign body inflammatory response. These reactions were greater in the silicone implant group.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
publishDate 2007
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502007000300006
work_keys_str_mv AT haddadfilhodouglas comparisonbetweentexturedsiliconeimplantsandthosebondedwithexpandedpolytetrafluoroethyleneinrats
AT zveibeldeborahk comparisonbetweentexturedsiliconeimplantsandthosebondedwithexpandedpolytetrafluoroethyleneinrats
AT alonsonivaldo comparisonbetweentexturedsiliconeimplantsandthosebondedwithexpandedpolytetrafluoroethyleneinrats
AT gemperlirolf comparisonbetweentexturedsiliconeimplantsandthosebondedwithexpandedpolytetrafluoroethyleneinrats
_version_ 1756400828326871040