EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS
Background: The instructions to authors are the only means of communication between researchers and the editorial standards of a scientific journal. One of the mandatory items to be contained therein is about the ethical part, to prevent new research to carry out abuses with the enrolled on the research are published and stimulated. Aim: To verify the ethical questions on the guidelines of Brazilian surgical journals Method: Thirteen selected journals were divided into two groups: general surgery (n=3), and surgical specialty (n=10). The instructions to authors were analyzed by the quote of ethical requirements based on a specific research protocol, ranging from zero to six points. Results: The average score of the general surgery group was similar than that of the surgical specialty group (3.66±0.57 vs 3.30±1.15, p=0.6154). When each ethical requirement was compared between the groups, there was no significant difference between the ethical requirements (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was respect for most ethical questions evaluated, with no difference between the journals of general or specialty surgery.
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
2015
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000400247 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0102-67202015000400247 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0102-672020150004002472017-07-31EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALSTEIXEIRA,Renan Kleber CostaYAMAKI,Vitor NagaiPONTES,Ruy Victor SimõesBRITO,Marcus Vinicius HenriquesSILVA,José Antonio Cordero da Bioethics Journal article Surgery Background: The instructions to authors are the only means of communication between researchers and the editorial standards of a scientific journal. One of the mandatory items to be contained therein is about the ethical part, to prevent new research to carry out abuses with the enrolled on the research are published and stimulated. Aim: To verify the ethical questions on the guidelines of Brazilian surgical journals Method: Thirteen selected journals were divided into two groups: general surgery (n=3), and surgical specialty (n=10). The instructions to authors were analyzed by the quote of ethical requirements based on a specific research protocol, ranging from zero to six points. Results: The average score of the general surgery group was similar than that of the surgical specialty group (3.66±0.57 vs 3.30±1.15, p=0.6154). When each ethical requirement was compared between the groups, there was no significant difference between the ethical requirements (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was respect for most ethical questions evaluated, with no difference between the journals of general or specialty surgery.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia DigestivaABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.28 n.4 20152015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000400247en10.1590/s0102-6720201500040007 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
TEIXEIRA,Renan Kleber Costa YAMAKI,Vitor Nagai PONTES,Ruy Victor Simões BRITO,Marcus Vinicius Henriques SILVA,José Antonio Cordero da |
spellingShingle |
TEIXEIRA,Renan Kleber Costa YAMAKI,Vitor Nagai PONTES,Ruy Victor Simões BRITO,Marcus Vinicius Henriques SILVA,José Antonio Cordero da EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS |
author_facet |
TEIXEIRA,Renan Kleber Costa YAMAKI,Vitor Nagai PONTES,Ruy Victor Simões BRITO,Marcus Vinicius Henriques SILVA,José Antonio Cordero da |
author_sort |
TEIXEIRA,Renan Kleber Costa |
title |
EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS |
title_short |
EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS |
title_full |
EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS |
title_fullStr |
EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS |
title_full_unstemmed |
EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS |
title_sort |
evaluation of ethical in instructions to authors of brazilian surgical journals |
description |
Background: The instructions to authors are the only means of communication between researchers and the editorial standards of a scientific journal. One of the mandatory items to be contained therein is about the ethical part, to prevent new research to carry out abuses with the enrolled on the research are published and stimulated. Aim: To verify the ethical questions on the guidelines of Brazilian surgical journals Method: Thirteen selected journals were divided into two groups: general surgery (n=3), and surgical specialty (n=10). The instructions to authors were analyzed by the quote of ethical requirements based on a specific research protocol, ranging from zero to six points. Results: The average score of the general surgery group was similar than that of the surgical specialty group (3.66±0.57 vs 3.30±1.15, p=0.6154). When each ethical requirement was compared between the groups, there was no significant difference between the ethical requirements (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was respect for most ethical questions evaluated, with no difference between the journals of general or specialty surgery. |
publisher |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000400247 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT teixeirarenanklebercosta evaluationofethicalininstructionstoauthorsofbraziliansurgicaljournals AT yamakivitornagai evaluationofethicalininstructionstoauthorsofbraziliansurgicaljournals AT pontesruyvictorsimoes evaluationofethicalininstructionstoauthorsofbraziliansurgicaljournals AT britomarcusviniciushenriques evaluationofethicalininstructionstoauthorsofbraziliansurgicaljournals AT silvajoseantoniocorderoda evaluationofethicalininstructionstoauthorsofbraziliansurgicaljournals |
_version_ |
1756398927143239680 |