Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
ABSTRACT Objective: To present some criteria, many of which were created in the form of a checklist of items to be considered throughout the review process. Furthermore, we present a study whose main objective was to build (and validate) a review instrument by specialists that is clear, comprehensive, concise and consistent with the highest standards of excellence. Method: We use a survey to collect data (123 answers). To analyze the open answers we use the technique of content analysis through the Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Results: Besides the creation of new criteria with a focus on methodological dimensions based on 12 items, the involvement of the Ibero-American Congress on Qualitative Research scientific committee in the validation of this instrument. Conclusion: This option, in line with the others described, will allow to implement improvements to the editions of the events using the Qualitative Research Evaluation Tool in 2018.
Main Authors: | Costa,António Pedro, Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
2019
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342019000100420 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A systematic review of Building Performance Evaluation criterias (BPE)
by: Christine Sotsek,N., et al.
Published: (2019) -
Peer review
by: Fontes,Bruno Machado
Published: (2015) -
Peer Review
Published: (2005) -
Professional Peer Review of the Evaluation Function of UNEP
by: United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG)
Published: (2012) -
Best Practice Peer-Reviewed Research Topic
by: Pearlman, Jay, et al.
Published: (2018)