Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers

ABSTRACT Objective: To present some criteria, many of which were created in the form of a checklist of items to be considered throughout the review process. Furthermore, we present a study whose main objective was to build (and validate) a review instrument by specialists that is clear, comprehensive, concise and consistent with the highest standards of excellence. Method: We use a survey to collect data (123 answers). To analyze the open answers we use the technique of content analysis through the Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Results: Besides the creation of new criteria with a focus on methodological dimensions based on 12 items, the involvement of the Ibero-American Congress on Qualitative Research scientific committee in the validation of this instrument. Conclusion: This option, in line with the others described, will allow to implement improvements to the editions of the events using the Qualitative Research Evaluation Tool in 2018.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Costa,António Pedro, Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem 2019
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342019000100420
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0080-62342019000100420
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0080-623420190001004202019-03-25Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewersCosta,António PedroMinayo,Maria Cecília de Souza Qualitative Research Checklist Peer Review Reference Standards Academic Performance ABSTRACT Objective: To present some criteria, many of which were created in the form of a checklist of items to be considered throughout the review process. Furthermore, we present a study whose main objective was to build (and validate) a review instrument by specialists that is clear, comprehensive, concise and consistent with the highest standards of excellence. Method: We use a survey to collect data (123 answers). To analyze the open answers we use the technique of content analysis through the Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Results: Besides the creation of new criteria with a focus on methodological dimensions based on 12 items, the involvement of the Ibero-American Congress on Qualitative Research scientific committee in the validation of this instrument. Conclusion: This option, in line with the others described, will allow to implement improvements to the editions of the events using the Qualitative Research Evaluation Tool in 2018.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de EnfermagemRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.53 20192019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342019000100420en10.1590/s1980-220x2018041403448
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Costa,António Pedro
Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza
spellingShingle Costa,António Pedro
Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza
Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
author_facet Costa,António Pedro
Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza
author_sort Costa,António Pedro
title Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
title_short Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
title_full Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
title_fullStr Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
title_full_unstemmed Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
title_sort building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
description ABSTRACT Objective: To present some criteria, many of which were created in the form of a checklist of items to be considered throughout the review process. Furthermore, we present a study whose main objective was to build (and validate) a review instrument by specialists that is clear, comprehensive, concise and consistent with the highest standards of excellence. Method: We use a survey to collect data (123 answers). To analyze the open answers we use the technique of content analysis through the Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Results: Besides the creation of new criteria with a focus on methodological dimensions based on 12 items, the involvement of the Ibero-American Congress on Qualitative Research scientific committee in the validation of this instrument. Conclusion: This option, in line with the others described, will allow to implement improvements to the editions of the events using the Qualitative Research Evaluation Tool in 2018.
publisher Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
publishDate 2019
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342019000100420
work_keys_str_mv AT costaantoniopedro buildingcriteriatoevaluatequalitativeresearchpapersatoolforpeerreviewers
AT minayomariaceciliadesouza buildingcriteriatoevaluatequalitativeresearchpapersatoolforpeerreviewers
_version_ 1756384460420415488