Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
ABSTRACT Objective: To present some criteria, many of which were created in the form of a checklist of items to be considered throughout the review process. Furthermore, we present a study whose main objective was to build (and validate) a review instrument by specialists that is clear, comprehensive, concise and consistent with the highest standards of excellence. Method: We use a survey to collect data (123 answers). To analyze the open answers we use the technique of content analysis through the Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Results: Besides the creation of new criteria with a focus on methodological dimensions based on 12 items, the involvement of the Ibero-American Congress on Qualitative Research scientific committee in the validation of this instrument. Conclusion: This option, in line with the others described, will allow to implement improvements to the editions of the events using the Qualitative Research Evaluation Tool in 2018.
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
2019
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342019000100420 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0080-62342019000100420 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0080-623420190001004202019-03-25Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewersCosta,António PedroMinayo,Maria Cecília de Souza Qualitative Research Checklist Peer Review Reference Standards Academic Performance ABSTRACT Objective: To present some criteria, many of which were created in the form of a checklist of items to be considered throughout the review process. Furthermore, we present a study whose main objective was to build (and validate) a review instrument by specialists that is clear, comprehensive, concise and consistent with the highest standards of excellence. Method: We use a survey to collect data (123 answers). To analyze the open answers we use the technique of content analysis through the Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Results: Besides the creation of new criteria with a focus on methodological dimensions based on 12 items, the involvement of the Ibero-American Congress on Qualitative Research scientific committee in the validation of this instrument. Conclusion: This option, in line with the others described, will allow to implement improvements to the editions of the events using the Qualitative Research Evaluation Tool in 2018.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de EnfermagemRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.53 20192019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342019000100420en10.1590/s1980-220x2018041403448 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Costa,António Pedro Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza |
spellingShingle |
Costa,António Pedro Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers |
author_facet |
Costa,António Pedro Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza |
author_sort |
Costa,António Pedro |
title |
Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers |
title_short |
Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers |
title_full |
Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers |
title_fullStr |
Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers |
title_sort |
building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To present some criteria, many of which were created in the form of a checklist of items to be considered throughout the review process. Furthermore, we present a study whose main objective was to build (and validate) a review instrument by specialists that is clear, comprehensive, concise and consistent with the highest standards of excellence. Method: We use a survey to collect data (123 answers). To analyze the open answers we use the technique of content analysis through the Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Results: Besides the creation of new criteria with a focus on methodological dimensions based on 12 items, the involvement of the Ibero-American Congress on Qualitative Research scientific committee in the validation of this instrument. Conclusion: This option, in line with the others described, will allow to implement improvements to the editions of the events using the Qualitative Research Evaluation Tool in 2018. |
publisher |
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342019000100420 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT costaantoniopedro buildingcriteriatoevaluatequalitativeresearchpapersatoolforpeerreviewers AT minayomariaceciliadesouza buildingcriteriatoevaluatequalitativeresearchpapersatoolforpeerreviewers |
_version_ |
1756384460420415488 |