A Comparison of Radiation Dose Between Standard and 3D Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease

Background: The use of three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) to assess patients with congenital heart diseases appears to be a promising technique despite the scarce literature available. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe our initial experience with 3D-RA and to compare its radiation dose to that of standard two-dimensional angiography (2D-SA). Methods: Between September 2011 and April 2012, 18 patients underwent simultaneous 3D-RA and 2D-SA during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Radiation dose was assessed using the dose-area-product (DAP). Results: The median patient age and weight were 12.5 years and 47.5 Kg, respectively. The median DAP of each 3D-RA acquisition was 1093µGy.m2 and 190µGy.m2 for each 2D-SA acquisition (p<0.01). In patients weighing more than 45Kg (n=7), this difference was attenuated but still significant (1525 µGy.m2 vs.413µGy.m2, p=0.01). No difference was found between one 3D-RA and three 2D-SA (1525µGy.m2 vs.1238 µGy.m2, p = 0.575) in this population. This difference was significantly higher in patients weighing less than 45Kg (n=9) (713µGy.m2 vs.81µGy.m2, P = 0.008), even when comparing one 3D-RA with three 2D-SA (242µGy.m2, respectively, p<0.008). 3D-RA was extremely useful for the assessment of conduits of univentricular hearts, tortuous branches of the pulmonary artery, and aorta relative to 2D-SA acquisitions. Conclusions: The radiation dose of 3D-RA used in our institution was higher than those previously reported in the literature and this difference was more evident in children. This type of assessment is of paramount importance when starting to perform 3D-RA.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manica,João Luiz Langer, Borges,Mônica Scott, Medeiros,Rogério Fachel de, Fischer,Leandro dos Santos, Broetto,Gabriel, Rossi Filho,Raul Ivo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 2014
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2014002000007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0066-782X2014002000007
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0066-782X20140020000072014-08-29A Comparison of Radiation Dose Between Standard and 3D Angiography in Congenital Heart DiseaseManica,João Luiz LangerBorges,Mônica ScottMedeiros,Rogério Fachel deFischer,Leandro dos SantosBroetto,GabrielRossi Filho,Raul Ivo Heart Defects, Congenital Coronary Angiography/ radiation effects Angiography,Digital Subtraction/methods Catheterization Background: The use of three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) to assess patients with congenital heart diseases appears to be a promising technique despite the scarce literature available. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe our initial experience with 3D-RA and to compare its radiation dose to that of standard two-dimensional angiography (2D-SA). Methods: Between September 2011 and April 2012, 18 patients underwent simultaneous 3D-RA and 2D-SA during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Radiation dose was assessed using the dose-area-product (DAP). Results: The median patient age and weight were 12.5 years and 47.5 Kg, respectively. The median DAP of each 3D-RA acquisition was 1093µGy.m2 and 190µGy.m2 for each 2D-SA acquisition (p<0.01). In patients weighing more than 45Kg (n=7), this difference was attenuated but still significant (1525 µGy.m2 vs.413µGy.m2, p=0.01). No difference was found between one 3D-RA and three 2D-SA (1525µGy.m2 vs.1238 µGy.m2, p = 0.575) in this population. This difference was significantly higher in patients weighing less than 45Kg (n=9) (713µGy.m2 vs.81µGy.m2, P = 0.008), even when comparing one 3D-RA with three 2D-SA (242µGy.m2, respectively, p<0.008). 3D-RA was extremely useful for the assessment of conduits of univentricular hearts, tortuous branches of the pulmonary artery, and aorta relative to 2D-SA acquisitions. Conclusions: The radiation dose of 3D-RA used in our institution was higher than those previously reported in the literature and this difference was more evident in children. This type of assessment is of paramount importance when starting to perform 3D-RA. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBCArquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.103 n.2 20142014-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2014002000007en10.5935/abc.20140118
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Manica,João Luiz Langer
Borges,Mônica Scott
Medeiros,Rogério Fachel de
Fischer,Leandro dos Santos
Broetto,Gabriel
Rossi Filho,Raul Ivo
spellingShingle Manica,João Luiz Langer
Borges,Mônica Scott
Medeiros,Rogério Fachel de
Fischer,Leandro dos Santos
Broetto,Gabriel
Rossi Filho,Raul Ivo
A Comparison of Radiation Dose Between Standard and 3D Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease
author_facet Manica,João Luiz Langer
Borges,Mônica Scott
Medeiros,Rogério Fachel de
Fischer,Leandro dos Santos
Broetto,Gabriel
Rossi Filho,Raul Ivo
author_sort Manica,João Luiz Langer
title A Comparison of Radiation Dose Between Standard and 3D Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease
title_short A Comparison of Radiation Dose Between Standard and 3D Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease
title_full A Comparison of Radiation Dose Between Standard and 3D Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease
title_fullStr A Comparison of Radiation Dose Between Standard and 3D Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Radiation Dose Between Standard and 3D Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease
title_sort comparison of radiation dose between standard and 3d angiography in congenital heart disease
description Background: The use of three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) to assess patients with congenital heart diseases appears to be a promising technique despite the scarce literature available. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe our initial experience with 3D-RA and to compare its radiation dose to that of standard two-dimensional angiography (2D-SA). Methods: Between September 2011 and April 2012, 18 patients underwent simultaneous 3D-RA and 2D-SA during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Radiation dose was assessed using the dose-area-product (DAP). Results: The median patient age and weight were 12.5 years and 47.5 Kg, respectively. The median DAP of each 3D-RA acquisition was 1093µGy.m2 and 190µGy.m2 for each 2D-SA acquisition (p<0.01). In patients weighing more than 45Kg (n=7), this difference was attenuated but still significant (1525 µGy.m2 vs.413µGy.m2, p=0.01). No difference was found between one 3D-RA and three 2D-SA (1525µGy.m2 vs.1238 µGy.m2, p = 0.575) in this population. This difference was significantly higher in patients weighing less than 45Kg (n=9) (713µGy.m2 vs.81µGy.m2, P = 0.008), even when comparing one 3D-RA with three 2D-SA (242µGy.m2, respectively, p<0.008). 3D-RA was extremely useful for the assessment of conduits of univentricular hearts, tortuous branches of the pulmonary artery, and aorta relative to 2D-SA acquisitions. Conclusions: The radiation dose of 3D-RA used in our institution was higher than those previously reported in the literature and this difference was more evident in children. This type of assessment is of paramount importance when starting to perform 3D-RA.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
publishDate 2014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2014002000007
work_keys_str_mv AT manicajoaoluizlanger acomparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT borgesmonicascott acomparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT medeirosrogeriofachelde acomparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT fischerleandrodossantos acomparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT broettogabriel acomparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT rossifilhoraulivo acomparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT manicajoaoluizlanger comparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT borgesmonicascott comparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT medeirosrogeriofachelde comparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT fischerleandrodossantos comparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT broettogabriel comparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
AT rossifilhoraulivo comparisonofradiationdosebetweenstandardand3dangiographyincongenitalheartdisease
_version_ 1756381925059067904