COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR USUAL METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF Candida SPECIES

SUMMARY Infection by Candidaspp. is associated with high mortality rates, especially when treatment is not appropriate and/or not immediate. Therefore, it is necessary to correctly identify the genus and species of Candida. The aim of this study was to compare the identification of 89 samples of Candida spp. by the manual methods germ tube test, auxanogram and chromogenic medium in relation to the ID 32C automated method. The concordances between the methods in ascending order, measured by the Kappa index were: ID 32C with CHROMagar Candida(κ = 0.38), ID 32C with auxanogram (κ = 0.59) and ID 32C with germ tube (κ = 0.9). One of the species identified in this study was C. tropicalis,which demonstrated a sensitivity of 46.2%, a specificity of 95.2%, PPV of 80%, NPV of 81.1%, and an accuracy of 80.9% in tests performed with CHROMagar Candida;and a sensitivity of 76.9%, a specificity of 96.8%, PPV of 90.9%, NPV of 91%, and an accuracy of 91% in the auxanogram tests. Therefore, it is necessary to know the advantages and limitations of methods to choose the best combination between them for a fast and correct identification of Candidaspecies.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SOUZA,Margarida Neves, ORTIZ,Stéfanie Otowicz, MELLO,Marcelo Martins, OLIVEIRA,Flávio de Mattos, SEVERO,Luiz Carlos, GOEBEL,Cristine Souza
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 2015
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-46652015000400281
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0036-46652015000400281
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0036-466520150004002812015-11-27COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR USUAL METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF Candida SPECIESSOUZA,Margarida NevesORTIZ,Stéfanie OtowiczMELLO,Marcelo MartinsOLIVEIRA,Flávio de MattosSEVERO,Luiz CarlosGOEBEL,Cristine Souza Candida Auxanogram ID 32C Chromogenic medium Germ tube SUMMARY Infection by Candidaspp. is associated with high mortality rates, especially when treatment is not appropriate and/or not immediate. Therefore, it is necessary to correctly identify the genus and species of Candida. The aim of this study was to compare the identification of 89 samples of Candida spp. by the manual methods germ tube test, auxanogram and chromogenic medium in relation to the ID 32C automated method. The concordances between the methods in ascending order, measured by the Kappa index were: ID 32C with CHROMagar Candida(κ = 0.38), ID 32C with auxanogram (κ = 0.59) and ID 32C with germ tube (κ = 0.9). One of the species identified in this study was C. tropicalis,which demonstrated a sensitivity of 46.2%, a specificity of 95.2%, PPV of 80%, NPV of 81.1%, and an accuracy of 80.9% in tests performed with CHROMagar Candida;and a sensitivity of 76.9%, a specificity of 96.8%, PPV of 90.9%, NPV of 91%, and an accuracy of 91% in the auxanogram tests. Therefore, it is necessary to know the advantages and limitations of methods to choose the best combination between them for a fast and correct identification of Candidaspecies.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Medicina Tropical de São PauloRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo v.57 n.4 20152015-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-46652015000400281en10.1590/S0036-46652015000400002
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author SOUZA,Margarida Neves
ORTIZ,Stéfanie Otowicz
MELLO,Marcelo Martins
OLIVEIRA,Flávio de Mattos
SEVERO,Luiz Carlos
GOEBEL,Cristine Souza
spellingShingle SOUZA,Margarida Neves
ORTIZ,Stéfanie Otowicz
MELLO,Marcelo Martins
OLIVEIRA,Flávio de Mattos
SEVERO,Luiz Carlos
GOEBEL,Cristine Souza
COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR USUAL METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF Candida SPECIES
author_facet SOUZA,Margarida Neves
ORTIZ,Stéfanie Otowicz
MELLO,Marcelo Martins
OLIVEIRA,Flávio de Mattos
SEVERO,Luiz Carlos
GOEBEL,Cristine Souza
author_sort SOUZA,Margarida Neves
title COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR USUAL METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF Candida SPECIES
title_short COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR USUAL METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF Candida SPECIES
title_full COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR USUAL METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF Candida SPECIES
title_fullStr COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR USUAL METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF Candida SPECIES
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR USUAL METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF Candida SPECIES
title_sort comparison between four usual methods of identification of candida species
description SUMMARY Infection by Candidaspp. is associated with high mortality rates, especially when treatment is not appropriate and/or not immediate. Therefore, it is necessary to correctly identify the genus and species of Candida. The aim of this study was to compare the identification of 89 samples of Candida spp. by the manual methods germ tube test, auxanogram and chromogenic medium in relation to the ID 32C automated method. The concordances between the methods in ascending order, measured by the Kappa index were: ID 32C with CHROMagar Candida(κ = 0.38), ID 32C with auxanogram (κ = 0.59) and ID 32C with germ tube (κ = 0.9). One of the species identified in this study was C. tropicalis,which demonstrated a sensitivity of 46.2%, a specificity of 95.2%, PPV of 80%, NPV of 81.1%, and an accuracy of 80.9% in tests performed with CHROMagar Candida;and a sensitivity of 76.9%, a specificity of 96.8%, PPV of 90.9%, NPV of 91%, and an accuracy of 91% in the auxanogram tests. Therefore, it is necessary to know the advantages and limitations of methods to choose the best combination between them for a fast and correct identification of Candidaspecies.
publisher Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
publishDate 2015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-46652015000400281
work_keys_str_mv AT souzamargaridaneves comparisonbetweenfourusualmethodsofidentificationofcandidaspecies
AT ortizstefanieotowicz comparisonbetweenfourusualmethodsofidentificationofcandidaspecies
AT mellomarcelomartins comparisonbetweenfourusualmethodsofidentificationofcandidaspecies
AT oliveiraflaviodemattos comparisonbetweenfourusualmethodsofidentificationofcandidaspecies
AT severoluizcarlos comparisonbetweenfourusualmethodsofidentificationofcandidaspecies
AT goebelcristinesouza comparisonbetweenfourusualmethodsofidentificationofcandidaspecies
_version_ 1756379900318580736