Sexual behavior patterns and HIV risks in bisexual men compared to exclusively heterosexual and homosexual men

OBJECTIVE: To compare patterns of sexual behavior among bisexual, heterosexual and homosexual men. MATERIAL AND METHODS:A household probability survey was carried out in Mexico City in 1992-1993 using the national health surveys sampling frame. Information from 8 068 men was obtained; however, the main analysis of this paper refers only to men sexually active in the previous 5 years. RESULTS: Bisexuals reported more prevalent anal intercourse with women (16% vs. 3%, p=0.01), and more sexual encounters with female sex workers than exclusive heterosexuals (10% vs. 4%; p=0.04). Bisexuals used condoms more often with sex workers than did heterosexuals (p=0.01). Most of the bisexuals (79%) did not engage in anal receptive or insertive intercourse with males in the previous year, practicing instead oral insertive sex or only masturbation; 35% of homosexuals did not report practicing anal sex. Bisexuals who engaged in anal intercourse had less anal receptive behavior than homosexuals (13% vs. 60%, p<0.01); of these, due to condom use, only 7% of bisexuals and 18% of homosexuals had unprotected anal receptive sex in the last intercourse with a male. CONCLUSIONS: Bisexuals practice less risky sexual behavior with males than exclusive homosexuals. This finding may imply that bisexual men in Mexico are an ineffective epidemiological bridge for HIV transmission.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Izazola-Licea,José Antonio, Gortmaker,Steven L, Gruttola,Víctor de, Tolbert,Kathryn, Mann,Jonathan
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública 2003
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342003001100012
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0036-36342003001100012
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0036-363420030011000122006-08-04Sexual behavior patterns and HIV risks in bisexual men compared to exclusively heterosexual and homosexual menIzazola-Licea,José AntonioGortmaker,Steven LGruttola,Víctor deTolbert,KathrynMann,Jonathan HIV household survey homosexuality bisexuality condom use Mexico OBJECTIVE: To compare patterns of sexual behavior among bisexual, heterosexual and homosexual men. MATERIAL AND METHODS:A household probability survey was carried out in Mexico City in 1992-1993 using the national health surveys sampling frame. Information from 8 068 men was obtained; however, the main analysis of this paper refers only to men sexually active in the previous 5 years. RESULTS: Bisexuals reported more prevalent anal intercourse with women (16% vs. 3%, p=0.01), and more sexual encounters with female sex workers than exclusive heterosexuals (10% vs. 4%; p=0.04). Bisexuals used condoms more often with sex workers than did heterosexuals (p=0.01). Most of the bisexuals (79%) did not engage in anal receptive or insertive intercourse with males in the previous year, practicing instead oral insertive sex or only masturbation; 35% of homosexuals did not report practicing anal sex. Bisexuals who engaged in anal intercourse had less anal receptive behavior than homosexuals (13% vs. 60%, p<0.01); of these, due to condom use, only 7% of bisexuals and 18% of homosexuals had unprotected anal receptive sex in the last intercourse with a male. CONCLUSIONS: Bisexuals practice less risky sexual behavior with males than exclusive homosexuals. This finding may imply that bisexual men in Mexico are an ineffective epidemiological bridge for HIV transmission.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaSalud Pública de México v.45 suppl.5 20032003-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342003001100012en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country México
countrycode MX
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-mx
tag revista
region America del Norte
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Izazola-Licea,José Antonio
Gortmaker,Steven L
Gruttola,Víctor de
Tolbert,Kathryn
Mann,Jonathan
spellingShingle Izazola-Licea,José Antonio
Gortmaker,Steven L
Gruttola,Víctor de
Tolbert,Kathryn
Mann,Jonathan
Sexual behavior patterns and HIV risks in bisexual men compared to exclusively heterosexual and homosexual men
author_facet Izazola-Licea,José Antonio
Gortmaker,Steven L
Gruttola,Víctor de
Tolbert,Kathryn
Mann,Jonathan
author_sort Izazola-Licea,José Antonio
title Sexual behavior patterns and HIV risks in bisexual men compared to exclusively heterosexual and homosexual men
title_short Sexual behavior patterns and HIV risks in bisexual men compared to exclusively heterosexual and homosexual men
title_full Sexual behavior patterns and HIV risks in bisexual men compared to exclusively heterosexual and homosexual men
title_fullStr Sexual behavior patterns and HIV risks in bisexual men compared to exclusively heterosexual and homosexual men
title_full_unstemmed Sexual behavior patterns and HIV risks in bisexual men compared to exclusively heterosexual and homosexual men
title_sort sexual behavior patterns and hiv risks in bisexual men compared to exclusively heterosexual and homosexual men
description OBJECTIVE: To compare patterns of sexual behavior among bisexual, heterosexual and homosexual men. MATERIAL AND METHODS:A household probability survey was carried out in Mexico City in 1992-1993 using the national health surveys sampling frame. Information from 8 068 men was obtained; however, the main analysis of this paper refers only to men sexually active in the previous 5 years. RESULTS: Bisexuals reported more prevalent anal intercourse with women (16% vs. 3%, p=0.01), and more sexual encounters with female sex workers than exclusive heterosexuals (10% vs. 4%; p=0.04). Bisexuals used condoms more often with sex workers than did heterosexuals (p=0.01). Most of the bisexuals (79%) did not engage in anal receptive or insertive intercourse with males in the previous year, practicing instead oral insertive sex or only masturbation; 35% of homosexuals did not report practicing anal sex. Bisexuals who engaged in anal intercourse had less anal receptive behavior than homosexuals (13% vs. 60%, p<0.01); of these, due to condom use, only 7% of bisexuals and 18% of homosexuals had unprotected anal receptive sex in the last intercourse with a male. CONCLUSIONS: Bisexuals practice less risky sexual behavior with males than exclusive homosexuals. This finding may imply that bisexual men in Mexico are an ineffective epidemiological bridge for HIV transmission.
publisher Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
publishDate 2003
url http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342003001100012
work_keys_str_mv AT izazolaliceajoseantonio sexualbehaviorpatternsandhivrisksinbisexualmencomparedtoexclusivelyheterosexualandhomosexualmen
AT gortmakerstevenl sexualbehaviorpatternsandhivrisksinbisexualmencomparedtoexclusivelyheterosexualandhomosexualmen
AT gruttolavictorde sexualbehaviorpatternsandhivrisksinbisexualmencomparedtoexclusivelyheterosexualandhomosexualmen
AT tolbertkathryn sexualbehaviorpatternsandhivrisksinbisexualmencomparedtoexclusivelyheterosexualandhomosexualmen
AT mannjonathan sexualbehaviorpatternsandhivrisksinbisexualmencomparedtoexclusivelyheterosexualandhomosexualmen
_version_ 1756220129095450625