Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology

ABSTRACT Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is uncommon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) among patients undergoing coronary angiography. Periprocedural CS is more frequent in high-risk patients and in technically demanding procedures. Aim: To describe the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO) for CS associated with interventional cardiology procedures. Material and Methods: Review of clinical records of seven patients treated between January 2014 and October 2018. Results: pVA-ECMO was implanted within 6 hours of the interventional cardiology procedure. All patients had coronary artery disease and one of them also had symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. One patient entered the CCL in cardiac arrest. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in all patients; four patients underwent an emergency procedure and five patients experienced PCI complications. One patient undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement suffered acute severe aortic regurgitation. An intra-aortic balloon pump was inserted at the CCL in five patients. Six patients experienced cardiac arrest. Mean SAVE score was -4.3 and baseline lactate 55 mg/dl. pVA-ECMO mean duration was 5 ± 4 days. Survival after both hospital discharge and 12 months of follow-up was 85.7% Regarding vascular access complications, we observed one access site hematoma and one episode of cannulation site bleeding requiring surgical repair. Conclusions: pVA-ECMO should be considered in patients with periprocedural CS as a bridge to recovery. Its use was associated with improved clinical outcomes in this series.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Verdugo,Fernando J., Cataldo,Pabla, Sandoval,Jorge, Pineda,Fernando, Dauvergne,Christian, Duarte,Manuel, Bonta,Camila, Iturra,Sebastián, Olivares,Gabriel, Concha,Marcelo, Rossel,Víctor
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2020
Online Access:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872020000901295
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-98872020000901295
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-988720200009012952020-12-26Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiologyVerdugo,Fernando J.Cataldo,PablaSandoval,JorgePineda,FernandoDauvergne,ChristianDuarte,ManuelBonta,CamilaIturra,SebastiánOlivares,GabrielConcha,MarceloRossel,Víctor Cardiac Catheterization Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Shock, Cardiogenic ABSTRACT Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is uncommon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) among patients undergoing coronary angiography. Periprocedural CS is more frequent in high-risk patients and in technically demanding procedures. Aim: To describe the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO) for CS associated with interventional cardiology procedures. Material and Methods: Review of clinical records of seven patients treated between January 2014 and October 2018. Results: pVA-ECMO was implanted within 6 hours of the interventional cardiology procedure. All patients had coronary artery disease and one of them also had symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. One patient entered the CCL in cardiac arrest. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in all patients; four patients underwent an emergency procedure and five patients experienced PCI complications. One patient undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement suffered acute severe aortic regurgitation. An intra-aortic balloon pump was inserted at the CCL in five patients. Six patients experienced cardiac arrest. Mean SAVE score was -4.3 and baseline lactate 55 mg/dl. pVA-ECMO mean duration was 5 ± 4 days. Survival after both hospital discharge and 12 months of follow-up was 85.7% Regarding vascular access complications, we observed one access site hematoma and one episode of cannulation site bleeding requiring surgical repair. Conclusions: pVA-ECMO should be considered in patients with periprocedural CS as a bridge to recovery. Its use was associated with improved clinical outcomes in this series.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.148 n.9 20202020-09-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872020000901295en10.4067/S0034-98872020000901295
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Chile
countrycode CL
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-cl
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Verdugo,Fernando J.
Cataldo,Pabla
Sandoval,Jorge
Pineda,Fernando
Dauvergne,Christian
Duarte,Manuel
Bonta,Camila
Iturra,Sebastián
Olivares,Gabriel
Concha,Marcelo
Rossel,Víctor
spellingShingle Verdugo,Fernando J.
Cataldo,Pabla
Sandoval,Jorge
Pineda,Fernando
Dauvergne,Christian
Duarte,Manuel
Bonta,Camila
Iturra,Sebastián
Olivares,Gabriel
Concha,Marcelo
Rossel,Víctor
Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology
author_facet Verdugo,Fernando J.
Cataldo,Pabla
Sandoval,Jorge
Pineda,Fernando
Dauvergne,Christian
Duarte,Manuel
Bonta,Camila
Iturra,Sebastián
Olivares,Gabriel
Concha,Marcelo
Rossel,Víctor
author_sort Verdugo,Fernando J.
title Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology
title_short Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology
title_full Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology
title_fullStr Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology
title_full_unstemmed Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology
title_sort peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology
description ABSTRACT Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is uncommon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) among patients undergoing coronary angiography. Periprocedural CS is more frequent in high-risk patients and in technically demanding procedures. Aim: To describe the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO) for CS associated with interventional cardiology procedures. Material and Methods: Review of clinical records of seven patients treated between January 2014 and October 2018. Results: pVA-ECMO was implanted within 6 hours of the interventional cardiology procedure. All patients had coronary artery disease and one of them also had symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. One patient entered the CCL in cardiac arrest. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in all patients; four patients underwent an emergency procedure and five patients experienced PCI complications. One patient undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement suffered acute severe aortic regurgitation. An intra-aortic balloon pump was inserted at the CCL in five patients. Six patients experienced cardiac arrest. Mean SAVE score was -4.3 and baseline lactate 55 mg/dl. pVA-ECMO mean duration was 5 ± 4 days. Survival after both hospital discharge and 12 months of follow-up was 85.7% Regarding vascular access complications, we observed one access site hematoma and one episode of cannulation site bleeding requiring surgical repair. Conclusions: pVA-ECMO should be considered in patients with periprocedural CS as a bridge to recovery. Its use was associated with improved clinical outcomes in this series.
publisher Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate 2020
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872020000901295
work_keys_str_mv AT verdugofernandoj peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
AT cataldopabla peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
AT sandovaljorge peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
AT pinedafernando peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
AT dauvergnechristian peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
AT duartemanuel peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
AT bontacamila peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
AT iturrasebastian peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
AT olivaresgabriel peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
AT conchamarcelo peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
AT rosselvictor peripheralvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforperiproceduralcardiogenicshockduringinterventionalcardiology
_version_ 1755988661769338880