Patient and public involvement in health technology decision-making processes in Brazil

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE The study aims to characterize and discuss the processes of patient and public involvement (PPI) in the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (Conitec), and the National Agency for Supplementary Health (ANS) in Brazil. METHODS This is an exploratory, descriptive, and comparative study, conducted by analyzing the public documents and regulation of the three institutions. RESULTS The mechanisms for PPI included public consultations, public hearings, participation in advisory committees, and health technology evaluation requests. Anvisa conducted 187 public consultations between 1999 and 2018, gathering 10,699 contributions. In total, 76 (41%) public consultations did not present information about the contributions received. Conitec carried out 234 public consultations and received 53,174 contributions between 2011 and 2018. It was identified that 70 (23%) recommendations from Conitec did not go through public consultation, and 26 (8%) recommendations changed after public consultation. Recommendation changes seemed to have occurred especially in cases with a greater number of contributions in the public consultation process. ANS conducted eight public consultations regarding the list of health procedures and events covered by health insurances between 2000 and 2018, and it received 31,498 contributions. For three public consultations, there was no information about the number of contributions received. CONCLUSIONS There are regulatory advances and institutional activity supporting PPI in highly technical decision-making processes in Brazil, although heterogeneously among the analyzed institutions. The power of PPI to influence health technology deliberative processes still requires in-depth studies, including the characterization of stakeholders and the legitimacy of decisions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lopes,Ana Carolina de Freitas, Novaes,Hillegonda Maria Dutilh, Soárez,Patricia Coelho de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102020000100299
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-89102020000100299
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-891020200001002992020-12-08Patient and public involvement in health technology decision-making processes in BrazilLopes,Ana Carolina de FreitasNovaes,Hillegonda Maria DutilhSoárez,Patricia Coelho de Community Participation Social Participation Stakeholder Participation Technology Assessment, Biomedical Biomedical Technology Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency Supplemental Health ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE The study aims to characterize and discuss the processes of patient and public involvement (PPI) in the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (Conitec), and the National Agency for Supplementary Health (ANS) in Brazil. METHODS This is an exploratory, descriptive, and comparative study, conducted by analyzing the public documents and regulation of the three institutions. RESULTS The mechanisms for PPI included public consultations, public hearings, participation in advisory committees, and health technology evaluation requests. Anvisa conducted 187 public consultations between 1999 and 2018, gathering 10,699 contributions. In total, 76 (41%) public consultations did not present information about the contributions received. Conitec carried out 234 public consultations and received 53,174 contributions between 2011 and 2018. It was identified that 70 (23%) recommendations from Conitec did not go through public consultation, and 26 (8%) recommendations changed after public consultation. Recommendation changes seemed to have occurred especially in cases with a greater number of contributions in the public consultation process. ANS conducted eight public consultations regarding the list of health procedures and events covered by health insurances between 2000 and 2018, and it received 31,498 contributions. For three public consultations, there was no information about the number of contributions received. CONCLUSIONS There are regulatory advances and institutional activity supporting PPI in highly technical decision-making processes in Brazil, although heterogeneously among the analyzed institutions. The power of PPI to influence health technology deliberative processes still requires in-depth studies, including the characterization of stakeholders and the legitimacy of decisions.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São PauloRevista de Saúde Pública v.54 20202020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102020000100299en10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002453
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Lopes,Ana Carolina de Freitas
Novaes,Hillegonda Maria Dutilh
Soárez,Patricia Coelho de
spellingShingle Lopes,Ana Carolina de Freitas
Novaes,Hillegonda Maria Dutilh
Soárez,Patricia Coelho de
Patient and public involvement in health technology decision-making processes in Brazil
author_facet Lopes,Ana Carolina de Freitas
Novaes,Hillegonda Maria Dutilh
Soárez,Patricia Coelho de
author_sort Lopes,Ana Carolina de Freitas
title Patient and public involvement in health technology decision-making processes in Brazil
title_short Patient and public involvement in health technology decision-making processes in Brazil
title_full Patient and public involvement in health technology decision-making processes in Brazil
title_fullStr Patient and public involvement in health technology decision-making processes in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Patient and public involvement in health technology decision-making processes in Brazil
title_sort patient and public involvement in health technology decision-making processes in brazil
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE The study aims to characterize and discuss the processes of patient and public involvement (PPI) in the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (Conitec), and the National Agency for Supplementary Health (ANS) in Brazil. METHODS This is an exploratory, descriptive, and comparative study, conducted by analyzing the public documents and regulation of the three institutions. RESULTS The mechanisms for PPI included public consultations, public hearings, participation in advisory committees, and health technology evaluation requests. Anvisa conducted 187 public consultations between 1999 and 2018, gathering 10,699 contributions. In total, 76 (41%) public consultations did not present information about the contributions received. Conitec carried out 234 public consultations and received 53,174 contributions between 2011 and 2018. It was identified that 70 (23%) recommendations from Conitec did not go through public consultation, and 26 (8%) recommendations changed after public consultation. Recommendation changes seemed to have occurred especially in cases with a greater number of contributions in the public consultation process. ANS conducted eight public consultations regarding the list of health procedures and events covered by health insurances between 2000 and 2018, and it received 31,498 contributions. For three public consultations, there was no information about the number of contributions received. CONCLUSIONS There are regulatory advances and institutional activity supporting PPI in highly technical decision-making processes in Brazil, although heterogeneously among the analyzed institutions. The power of PPI to influence health technology deliberative processes still requires in-depth studies, including the characterization of stakeholders and the legitimacy of decisions.
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102020000100299
work_keys_str_mv AT lopesanacarolinadefreitas patientandpublicinvolvementinhealthtechnologydecisionmakingprocessesinbrazil
AT novaeshillegondamariadutilh patientandpublicinvolvementinhealthtechnologydecisionmakingprocessesinbrazil
AT soarezpatriciacoelhode patientandpublicinvolvementinhealthtechnologydecisionmakingprocessesinbrazil
_version_ 1756379474238111744