Para uma sociologia dos intelectuais

The study retraces and discusses Sergio Miceli's contribution to the sociology of intellectuals. The hypothesis is that despite the focus in his research on the internal elements in intellectuals' strategies for insertion, Miceli leaves the tension open in the assumption of autonomy in an "intellectual field" and its relations with the broader social process. We highlight his proposal of biography as the analytical locus, discussing (1) the ambiguities deriving from the lack of distinction between biography as a source and as a method, (2) the class-based nature of his sociology of intellectuals, and (3) the emphasis on the heterogeneity underlying the macro-sociological categories. We discuss other views that compete with Miceli's perspective and argue for a new understanding of ideas as reflexive social forces and as part of the agenda in contemporary sociology.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bastos,Elide Rugai, Botelho,André
Format: Digital revista
Language:Portuguese
Published: Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) 2010
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582010000400004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0011-52582010000400004
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0011-525820100004000042011-03-22Para uma sociologia dos intelectuaisBastos,Elide RugaiBotelho,André intellectuals ideas social thought contemporary Brazilian sociology The study retraces and discusses Sergio Miceli's contribution to the sociology of intellectuals. The hypothesis is that despite the focus in his research on the internal elements in intellectuals' strategies for insertion, Miceli leaves the tension open in the assumption of autonomy in an "intellectual field" and its relations with the broader social process. We highlight his proposal of biography as the analytical locus, discussing (1) the ambiguities deriving from the lack of distinction between biography as a source and as a method, (2) the class-based nature of his sociology of intellectuals, and (3) the emphasis on the heterogeneity underlying the macro-sociological categories. We discuss other views that compete with Miceli's perspective and argue for a new understanding of ideas as reflexive social forces and as part of the agenda in contemporary sociology.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)Dados v.53 n.4 20102010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582010000400004pt10.1590/S0011-52582010000400004
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language Portuguese
format Digital
author Bastos,Elide Rugai
Botelho,André
spellingShingle Bastos,Elide Rugai
Botelho,André
Para uma sociologia dos intelectuais
author_facet Bastos,Elide Rugai
Botelho,André
author_sort Bastos,Elide Rugai
title Para uma sociologia dos intelectuais
title_short Para uma sociologia dos intelectuais
title_full Para uma sociologia dos intelectuais
title_fullStr Para uma sociologia dos intelectuais
title_full_unstemmed Para uma sociologia dos intelectuais
title_sort para uma sociologia dos intelectuais
description The study retraces and discusses Sergio Miceli's contribution to the sociology of intellectuals. The hypothesis is that despite the focus in his research on the internal elements in intellectuals' strategies for insertion, Miceli leaves the tension open in the assumption of autonomy in an "intellectual field" and its relations with the broader social process. We highlight his proposal of biography as the analytical locus, discussing (1) the ambiguities deriving from the lack of distinction between biography as a source and as a method, (2) the class-based nature of his sociology of intellectuals, and (3) the emphasis on the heterogeneity underlying the macro-sociological categories. We discuss other views that compete with Miceli's perspective and argue for a new understanding of ideas as reflexive social forces and as part of the agenda in contemporary sociology.
publisher Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
publishDate 2010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582010000400004
work_keys_str_mv AT bastoseliderugai paraumasociologiadosintelectuais
AT botelhoandre paraumasociologiadosintelectuais
_version_ 1756375558411780096