Paradigms for subdural grids' implantation in patients with refractory epilepsy

RATIONALE: The need for invasive monitoring in patients with refractory epilepsy has been greatly reduced by the introduction of new technologies such as PET, SPECT and MRI in the clinical practice. On the other hand, 10 to 30% of the patients with refractory epilepsy have non-localizatory non-invasive preoperative work-up results. This paper reports on the paradigms for subdural electrodes implantation in patients with different refractory epileptic syndromes. METHODS: Twenty-nine adult refractory epileptic patients were studied. Patients were divided into five different epileptic syndromes that represented the majority of the patients who needed invasive recordings: bitemporal (Group I; n=16 ), bi-frontal-mesial (Group II, n=5), hemispheric (Group III; n=2), anterior quadrant (Group IV; n=3) and posterior quadrant (Group V; n=3). All of them were submitted to extensive subdural electrodes' implantation (from 64 to 160 contacts) covering all the cortical surface potentially involved in epileptogenesis under general anesthesia. Results: All patients tolerated well the procedure. There was no sign or symptom of intracranial hypertension except for headache in 22 patients. In all except one Group II patient, prolonged electrocorticographic monitoring using the described subdural cortical coverage patterns was able to define a focal area amenable for resection. In all Groups II-V patients cortical stimulation was able to adequately map the rolandic and speach areas as necessary. CONCLUSION: Despite recent technological advances invasive neurophysiological studies are still necessary in some patients with refractory epilepsy. The standardization of the paradigms for subdural implantation coupled to the study of homogeneous patients' populations as defined by MRI will certainly lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology involved in such cases and an improved surgical outcome.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CUKIERT,ARTHUR, SOUSA,ALCIONE, MACHADO,ELCIO, BURATINI,JOSE AUGUSTO, VIEIRA,JOAQUIM, FERREIRA,VIVIANE, FORSTER,CASSIO, ARGENTONI,MEIRE, FRAYMAN,LEILA
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO 2000
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2000000400006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0004-282X2000000400006
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0004-282X20000004000062000-12-06Paradigms for subdural grids' implantation in patients with refractory epilepsyCUKIERT,ARTHURSOUSA,ALCIONEMACHADO,ELCIOBURATINI,JOSE AUGUSTOVIEIRA,JOAQUIMFERREIRA,VIVIANEFORSTER,CASSIOARGENTONI,MEIREFRAYMAN,LEILA epilepsy surgery subdural electrodes outcome standards RATIONALE: The need for invasive monitoring in patients with refractory epilepsy has been greatly reduced by the introduction of new technologies such as PET, SPECT and MRI in the clinical practice. On the other hand, 10 to 30% of the patients with refractory epilepsy have non-localizatory non-invasive preoperative work-up results. This paper reports on the paradigms for subdural electrodes implantation in patients with different refractory epileptic syndromes. METHODS: Twenty-nine adult refractory epileptic patients were studied. Patients were divided into five different epileptic syndromes that represented the majority of the patients who needed invasive recordings: bitemporal (Group I; n=16 ), bi-frontal-mesial (Group II, n=5), hemispheric (Group III; n=2), anterior quadrant (Group IV; n=3) and posterior quadrant (Group V; n=3). All of them were submitted to extensive subdural electrodes' implantation (from 64 to 160 contacts) covering all the cortical surface potentially involved in epileptogenesis under general anesthesia. Results: All patients tolerated well the procedure. There was no sign or symptom of intracranial hypertension except for headache in 22 patients. In all except one Group II patient, prolonged electrocorticographic monitoring using the described subdural cortical coverage patterns was able to define a focal area amenable for resection. In all Groups II-V patients cortical stimulation was able to adequately map the rolandic and speach areas as necessary. CONCLUSION: Despite recent technological advances invasive neurophysiological studies are still necessary in some patients with refractory epilepsy. The standardization of the paradigms for subdural implantation coupled to the study of homogeneous patients' populations as defined by MRI will certainly lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology involved in such cases and an improved surgical outcome.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcademia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEUROArquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.58 n.3A 20002000-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2000000400006en10.1590/S0004-282X2000000400006
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author CUKIERT,ARTHUR
SOUSA,ALCIONE
MACHADO,ELCIO
BURATINI,JOSE AUGUSTO
VIEIRA,JOAQUIM
FERREIRA,VIVIANE
FORSTER,CASSIO
ARGENTONI,MEIRE
FRAYMAN,LEILA
spellingShingle CUKIERT,ARTHUR
SOUSA,ALCIONE
MACHADO,ELCIO
BURATINI,JOSE AUGUSTO
VIEIRA,JOAQUIM
FERREIRA,VIVIANE
FORSTER,CASSIO
ARGENTONI,MEIRE
FRAYMAN,LEILA
Paradigms for subdural grids' implantation in patients with refractory epilepsy
author_facet CUKIERT,ARTHUR
SOUSA,ALCIONE
MACHADO,ELCIO
BURATINI,JOSE AUGUSTO
VIEIRA,JOAQUIM
FERREIRA,VIVIANE
FORSTER,CASSIO
ARGENTONI,MEIRE
FRAYMAN,LEILA
author_sort CUKIERT,ARTHUR
title Paradigms for subdural grids' implantation in patients with refractory epilepsy
title_short Paradigms for subdural grids' implantation in patients with refractory epilepsy
title_full Paradigms for subdural grids' implantation in patients with refractory epilepsy
title_fullStr Paradigms for subdural grids' implantation in patients with refractory epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Paradigms for subdural grids' implantation in patients with refractory epilepsy
title_sort paradigms for subdural grids' implantation in patients with refractory epilepsy
description RATIONALE: The need for invasive monitoring in patients with refractory epilepsy has been greatly reduced by the introduction of new technologies such as PET, SPECT and MRI in the clinical practice. On the other hand, 10 to 30% of the patients with refractory epilepsy have non-localizatory non-invasive preoperative work-up results. This paper reports on the paradigms for subdural electrodes implantation in patients with different refractory epileptic syndromes. METHODS: Twenty-nine adult refractory epileptic patients were studied. Patients were divided into five different epileptic syndromes that represented the majority of the patients who needed invasive recordings: bitemporal (Group I; n=16 ), bi-frontal-mesial (Group II, n=5), hemispheric (Group III; n=2), anterior quadrant (Group IV; n=3) and posterior quadrant (Group V; n=3). All of them were submitted to extensive subdural electrodes' implantation (from 64 to 160 contacts) covering all the cortical surface potentially involved in epileptogenesis under general anesthesia. Results: All patients tolerated well the procedure. There was no sign or symptom of intracranial hypertension except for headache in 22 patients. In all except one Group II patient, prolonged electrocorticographic monitoring using the described subdural cortical coverage patterns was able to define a focal area amenable for resection. In all Groups II-V patients cortical stimulation was able to adequately map the rolandic and speach areas as necessary. CONCLUSION: Despite recent technological advances invasive neurophysiological studies are still necessary in some patients with refractory epilepsy. The standardization of the paradigms for subdural implantation coupled to the study of homogeneous patients' populations as defined by MRI will certainly lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology involved in such cases and an improved surgical outcome.
publisher Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
publishDate 2000
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2000000400006
work_keys_str_mv AT cukiertarthur paradigmsforsubduralgridsimplantationinpatientswithrefractoryepilepsy
AT sousaalcione paradigmsforsubduralgridsimplantationinpatientswithrefractoryepilepsy
AT machadoelcio paradigmsforsubduralgridsimplantationinpatientswithrefractoryepilepsy
AT buratinijoseaugusto paradigmsforsubduralgridsimplantationinpatientswithrefractoryepilepsy
AT vieirajoaquim paradigmsforsubduralgridsimplantationinpatientswithrefractoryepilepsy
AT ferreiraviviane paradigmsforsubduralgridsimplantationinpatientswithrefractoryepilepsy
AT forstercassio paradigmsforsubduralgridsimplantationinpatientswithrefractoryepilepsy
AT argentonimeire paradigmsforsubduralgridsimplantationinpatientswithrefractoryepilepsy
AT fraymanleila paradigmsforsubduralgridsimplantationinpatientswithrefractoryepilepsy
_version_ 1756374149210570752