Analysis of the competitiveness on pig farming in Tejupilco and Luvianos, Mexico (2006-2018)

Introduction. Meat pork production is rank third of all meats in Mexico after beef and broilers. Production is not enough to supply the national consumption and reduce imports. Objective. Analyze the evolution of costs, profitability and competitiveness of pig production in the regions of Tejupilco and Luvianos, located in the South of the State of Mexico. Materials and methods. The investigation was carried out using information from forty backyard and one technificated farms; A Policy Analysis Matrix was used. Matrices were elaborated of technical coefficients, prices of inputs and product and private budgets. Results. Private returns (RP) were at 26% for backyard ones and 43% for technifhicated one, while private cost ratio (RCP) was 0.35 for backyard ones and 0.17 for technical one, thus, greater competitiveness was observed in the latter. Conclusion. Indicators point out these two types of pig farms were profitable in 2018, and were competitives in relation to those obtained in 2006, it was mainly due to movements in constant terms of inputs costs, which decreased and the increase in the price of live pigs, which contributed producers taking actions to be more productive and efficient.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hernández-Martínez, Juvencio, Rodríguez-Licea, Gabriela, Gómez-Tenorio, Germán, Guzmán-Soria, Eugenio, Rebollar-Rebollar, Eulogio, Rebollar-Rebollar, Samuel
Format: Digital revista
Language:spa
eng
Published: Universidad de Costa Rica 2020
Online Access:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/39337
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article39337
record_format ojs
institution UCR
collection OJS
country Costa Rica
countrycode CR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-agromeso
tag revista
region America Central
libraryname Bibioteca de la Facultad de Agronomía
language spa
eng
format Digital
author Hernández-Martínez, Juvencio
Rodríguez-Licea, Gabriela
Gómez-Tenorio, Germán
Guzmán-Soria, Eugenio
Rebollar-Rebollar, Eulogio
Rebollar-Rebollar, Samuel
spellingShingle Hernández-Martínez, Juvencio
Rodríguez-Licea, Gabriela
Gómez-Tenorio, Germán
Guzmán-Soria, Eugenio
Rebollar-Rebollar, Eulogio
Rebollar-Rebollar, Samuel
Analysis of the competitiveness on pig farming in Tejupilco and Luvianos, Mexico (2006-2018)
author_facet Hernández-Martínez, Juvencio
Rodríguez-Licea, Gabriela
Gómez-Tenorio, Germán
Guzmán-Soria, Eugenio
Rebollar-Rebollar, Eulogio
Rebollar-Rebollar, Samuel
author_sort Hernández-Martínez, Juvencio
title Analysis of the competitiveness on pig farming in Tejupilco and Luvianos, Mexico (2006-2018)
title_short Analysis of the competitiveness on pig farming in Tejupilco and Luvianos, Mexico (2006-2018)
title_full Analysis of the competitiveness on pig farming in Tejupilco and Luvianos, Mexico (2006-2018)
title_fullStr Analysis of the competitiveness on pig farming in Tejupilco and Luvianos, Mexico (2006-2018)
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the competitiveness on pig farming in Tejupilco and Luvianos, Mexico (2006-2018)
title_sort analysis of the competitiveness on pig farming in tejupilco and luvianos, mexico (2006-2018)
description Introduction. Meat pork production is rank third of all meats in Mexico after beef and broilers. Production is not enough to supply the national consumption and reduce imports. Objective. Analyze the evolution of costs, profitability and competitiveness of pig production in the regions of Tejupilco and Luvianos, located in the South of the State of Mexico. Materials and methods. The investigation was carried out using information from forty backyard and one technificated farms; A Policy Analysis Matrix was used. Matrices were elaborated of technical coefficients, prices of inputs and product and private budgets. Results. Private returns (RP) were at 26% for backyard ones and 43% for technifhicated one, while private cost ratio (RCP) was 0.35 for backyard ones and 0.17 for technical one, thus, greater competitiveness was observed in the latter. Conclusion. Indicators point out these two types of pig farms were profitable in 2018, and were competitives in relation to those obtained in 2006, it was mainly due to movements in constant terms of inputs costs, which decreased and the increase in the price of live pigs, which contributed producers taking actions to be more productive and efficient.
publisher Universidad de Costa Rica
publishDate 2020
url https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/39337
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezmartinezjuvencio analysisofthecompetitivenessonpigfarmingintejupilcoandluvianosmexico20062018
AT rodriguezliceagabriela analysisofthecompetitivenessonpigfarmingintejupilcoandluvianosmexico20062018
AT gomeztenoriogerman analysisofthecompetitivenessonpigfarmingintejupilcoandluvianosmexico20062018
AT guzmansoriaeugenio analysisofthecompetitivenessonpigfarmingintejupilcoandluvianosmexico20062018
AT rebollarrebollareulogio analysisofthecompetitivenessonpigfarmingintejupilcoandluvianosmexico20062018
AT rebollarrebollarsamuel analysisofthecompetitivenessonpigfarmingintejupilcoandluvianosmexico20062018
AT hernandezmartinezjuvencio analisisdelacompetitividaddelaporciculturaentejupilcoyluvianosmexico20062018
AT rodriguezliceagabriela analisisdelacompetitividaddelaporciculturaentejupilcoyluvianosmexico20062018
AT gomeztenoriogerman analisisdelacompetitividaddelaporciculturaentejupilcoyluvianosmexico20062018
AT guzmansoriaeugenio analisisdelacompetitividaddelaporciculturaentejupilcoyluvianosmexico20062018
AT rebollarrebollareulogio analisisdelacompetitividaddelaporciculturaentejupilcoyluvianosmexico20062018
AT rebollarrebollarsamuel analisisdelacompetitividaddelaporciculturaentejupilcoyluvianosmexico20062018
_version_ 1787235293111255040
spelling oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article393372023-06-16T13:45:30Z Analysis of the competitiveness on pig farming in Tejupilco and Luvianos, Mexico (2006-2018) Análisis de la competitividad de la porcicultura en Tejupilco y Luvianos, México (2006-2018) Hernández-Martínez, Juvencio Rodríguez-Licea, Gabriela Gómez-Tenorio, Germán Guzmán-Soria, Eugenio Rebollar-Rebollar, Eulogio Rebollar-Rebollar, Samuel pig farms Backyard pig production costs incomes profits granjas porcinas producción de traspatio costos ingresos ganancias Introduction. Meat pork production is rank third of all meats in Mexico after beef and broilers. Production is not enough to supply the national consumption and reduce imports. Objective. Analyze the evolution of costs, profitability and competitiveness of pig production in the regions of Tejupilco and Luvianos, located in the South of the State of Mexico. Materials and methods. The investigation was carried out using information from forty backyard and one technificated farms; A Policy Analysis Matrix was used. Matrices were elaborated of technical coefficients, prices of inputs and product and private budgets. Results. Private returns (RP) were at 26% for backyard ones and 43% for technifhicated one, while private cost ratio (RCP) was 0.35 for backyard ones and 0.17 for technical one, thus, greater competitiveness was observed in the latter. Conclusion. Indicators point out these two types of pig farms were profitable in 2018, and were competitives in relation to those obtained in 2006, it was mainly due to movements in constant terms of inputs costs, which decreased and the increase in the price of live pigs, which contributed producers taking actions to be more productive and efficient. Introducción. La producción de carne de cerdo en canal en México, ocupó el tercer lugar dentro de la producción de carnes después de la carne de bovino y de aves; el volumen producido de carne de este tipo no ha sido suficiente para cubrir el consumo nacional y disminuir las importaciones. Objetivo. Analizar la evolución de los costos, de la rentabilidad y competitividad de la producción porcina en las regiones de Tejupilco y Luvianos, ubicados en el Sur del Estado de México. Materiales y métodos. La investigación se realizó con información proveniente de cuarenta productores de traspatio y una tecnificada; la metodología utilizada fue la Matriz de Análisis de Política, con la que se elaboraron las matrices de coeficientes técnicos y de los precios de los insumos y del producto, con la que obtuvieron las matrices de presupuesto privado. Resultados. Las rentabilidades privadas (RP) se ubicaron en 26 % para las de traspatio y en 43 % para la tecnificada, mientras que la relación de costo privado (RCP) fue de 0,35 para las de traspatio y de 0,17 para la tecnificada, con lo que se observó una mayor competitividad en esta última. Conclusión. Los indicadores señalan que en 2018, éstos dos tipos de explotaciones porcícolas fueron rentables y competitivos en relación a los obtenidos en 2006, debido principalmente a movimientos en términos constantes de los costos de los insumos, que descendieron y al aumento en el precio del cerdo en pie, lo que contribuyó a que estos productores realizaran acciones tendientes a ser más productivos y eficientes. Universidad de Costa Rica 2020-09-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article text/xml text/html application/pdf application/epub+zip audio/mpeg audio/mpeg https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/39337 10.15517/am.v31i3.39337 Agronomía Mesoamericana; 2020: Agronomía Mesoamericana: Vol. 31, Issue 3 (September-December); 663-677 Agronomía Mesoamericana; 2020: Agronomía Mesoamericana: Vol. 31, Nº 3 (setiembre-diciembre); 663-677 Agronomía Mesoamericana; 2020: Agronomía Mesoamericana: Vol. 31, Issue 3 (September-December); 663-677 2215-3608 1021-7444 spa eng https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/39337/44058 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/39337/43857 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/39337/43858 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/39337/43859 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/39337/43860 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/39337/43861 Copyright (c) 2020 Juvencio Hernández Martínez, Gabriela Rodríguez Licea, Germán Gómez Tenorio, Eugenio Guzmán Soria, Eulogio Rebollar Rebollar, Samuel Rebollar Rebollar