Aquaculture research with funding from CONAHCYT in three public research centers in Mexico

Objective: Analyze the projects on aquatic species financed by CONAHCYT through the information provided by the Transparency Units (TU) of the public research centers (PRC) CIBNOR, CICESE and CIAD. Design/Methodology/Approach: The information was requested from the TUs of the centers through the official email of the TUs. The TUs sent the information, and it was organized in spreadsheets for later analysis. For the analysis, only the projects financed by CONAHCYT were considered and the following were selected: the year the project began, the technical manager, the species or species that were the main object of the project, and the amount approved. Results: The projects financed in the timeline established by each center are shown, as well as the amounts approved, the responsible researchers and the species addressed. Native species are the ones that have obtained the most financed projects, although part of the budget has been applied to invasive alien species. The social incidence is perceptible in some of the financed projects, although it has been a characteristic that has been fairly attended. Study limitations/Implications: The research has been limited to the information provided by the TUs of PRCs. If more information exists, it is not available through this route. Findings/Conclusions: The three PRCs propose projects that are mostly on native aquatic species. There has been a decrease in the number of projects funded. The social incidence is barely perceptible in the projects proposed and financed by CONAHCYT. .

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chong-Carrillo, Olimpia, Peña-Almaraz, Omar A., Aréchiga-Palomera, Martín A., Vega-Villasante, Fernando
Format: Digital revista
Language:spa
Published: Colegio de Postgraduados 2023
Online Access:https://revista-agroproductividad.org/index.php/agroproductividad/article/view/2656
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article2656
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article26562023-08-30T15:56:05Z Aquaculture research with funding from CONAHCYT in three public research centers in Mexico Chong-Carrillo, Olimpia Peña-Almaraz, Omar A. Aréchiga-Palomera, Martín A. Vega-Villasante, Fernando Projects, budget, Mexico, social incidence, aquaculture Objective: Analyze the projects on aquatic species financed by CONAHCYT through the information provided by the Transparency Units (TU) of the public research centers (PRC) CIBNOR, CICESE and CIAD. Design/Methodology/Approach: The information was requested from the TUs of the centers through the official email of the TUs. The TUs sent the information, and it was organized in spreadsheets for later analysis. For the analysis, only the projects financed by CONAHCYT were considered and the following were selected: the year the project began, the technical manager, the species or species that were the main object of the project, and the amount approved. Results: The projects financed in the timeline established by each center are shown, as well as the amounts approved, the responsible researchers and the species addressed. Native species are the ones that have obtained the most financed projects, although part of the budget has been applied to invasive alien species. The social incidence is perceptible in some of the financed projects, although it has been a characteristic that has been fairly attended. Study limitations/Implications: The research has been limited to the information provided by the TUs of PRCs. If more information exists, it is not available through this route. Findings/Conclusions: The three PRCs propose projects that are mostly on native aquatic species. There has been a decrease in the number of projects funded. The social incidence is barely perceptible in the projects proposed and financed by CONAHCYT. . Colegio de Postgraduados 2023-08-28 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revista-agroproductividad.org/index.php/agroproductividad/article/view/2656 10.32854/agrop.v16i7.2656 AgroP; 2023: EARLY ACCESS (Vol. VII) Agro Productividad; 2023: EARLY ACCESS (Vol. VII) 2594-0252 2448-7546 spa https://revista-agroproductividad.org/index.php/agroproductividad/article/view/2656/2124 Derechos de autor 2023 Agro Productividad
institution COLPOS
collection OJS
country México
countrycode MX
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-agroproductividad-mx
tag revista
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language spa
format Digital
author Chong-Carrillo, Olimpia
Peña-Almaraz, Omar A.
Aréchiga-Palomera, Martín A.
Vega-Villasante, Fernando
spellingShingle Chong-Carrillo, Olimpia
Peña-Almaraz, Omar A.
Aréchiga-Palomera, Martín A.
Vega-Villasante, Fernando
Aquaculture research with funding from CONAHCYT in three public research centers in Mexico
author_facet Chong-Carrillo, Olimpia
Peña-Almaraz, Omar A.
Aréchiga-Palomera, Martín A.
Vega-Villasante, Fernando
author_sort Chong-Carrillo, Olimpia
title Aquaculture research with funding from CONAHCYT in three public research centers in Mexico
title_short Aquaculture research with funding from CONAHCYT in three public research centers in Mexico
title_full Aquaculture research with funding from CONAHCYT in three public research centers in Mexico
title_fullStr Aquaculture research with funding from CONAHCYT in three public research centers in Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Aquaculture research with funding from CONAHCYT in three public research centers in Mexico
title_sort aquaculture research with funding from conahcyt in three public research centers in mexico
description Objective: Analyze the projects on aquatic species financed by CONAHCYT through the information provided by the Transparency Units (TU) of the public research centers (PRC) CIBNOR, CICESE and CIAD. Design/Methodology/Approach: The information was requested from the TUs of the centers through the official email of the TUs. The TUs sent the information, and it was organized in spreadsheets for later analysis. For the analysis, only the projects financed by CONAHCYT were considered and the following were selected: the year the project began, the technical manager, the species or species that were the main object of the project, and the amount approved. Results: The projects financed in the timeline established by each center are shown, as well as the amounts approved, the responsible researchers and the species addressed. Native species are the ones that have obtained the most financed projects, although part of the budget has been applied to invasive alien species. The social incidence is perceptible in some of the financed projects, although it has been a characteristic that has been fairly attended. Study limitations/Implications: The research has been limited to the information provided by the TUs of PRCs. If more information exists, it is not available through this route. Findings/Conclusions: The three PRCs propose projects that are mostly on native aquatic species. There has been a decrease in the number of projects funded. The social incidence is barely perceptible in the projects proposed and financed by CONAHCYT. .
publisher Colegio de Postgraduados
publishDate 2023
url https://revista-agroproductividad.org/index.php/agroproductividad/article/view/2656
work_keys_str_mv AT chongcarrilloolimpia aquacultureresearchwithfundingfromconahcytinthreepublicresearchcentersinmexico
AT penaalmarazomara aquacultureresearchwithfundingfromconahcytinthreepublicresearchcentersinmexico
AT arechigapalomeramartina aquacultureresearchwithfundingfromconahcytinthreepublicresearchcentersinmexico
AT vegavillasantefernando aquacultureresearchwithfundingfromconahcytinthreepublicresearchcentersinmexico
_version_ 1775952319646531584