Plan S: take Latin America’s long experience on board

We share the spirit of Plan S to achieve full open access to scholarly publications (see go.nature.com/2hszsaf), but we disagree with its implementation guidelines. The plan’s design ignores more than 20 years of widespread experience in open-access publishing in many developing nations, as well as Latin America’s widespread ethos of free-to-publish and free-toread research. To rectify this, the Plan S guidelines need to tackle the longstanding issues of conventional scholarly publishing, including the high concentration of articles in commercial publications. Funders should promote open-access practices that are more globally inclusive, while improving the quality of editorial processes and keeping their control within the scientific community.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Debat, Humberto Julio, Babini, Dominique
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Nature Research 2019-09-24
Subjects:Acceso a la Información, Acceso Abierto, Publicaciones, América Latina, Access to Information, Open Access, Publications, Latin America, Plan S, Open Access Publishing,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8374
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02857-1
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02857-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!