Managing Socio‐Ecological Systems to Achieve Sustainability: A Study of Resilience and Robustness

Growing symptoms of the mismanagement of socio‐ecological systems (SESs) show that the long‐term existence of these systems is threatened. SES management improvement is the aim of many policy measures. But how successful are these various simultaneous policy measures in achieving the sustainable management of SESs? A framework for analysing policy measures and the management actions of land users was developed by Leach et al. (2010): the authors postulate that the sustainability of an SES depends on four system properties – stability, resilience, durability and robustness – and that external shocks and stresses affect these properties differently. The aim of this contribution is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the approach by applying it to three case studies, in Namibia, Argentina and Indonesia. We found that (1) more actions were directed towards resilience and robustness than towards command and control, (2) actions directed at stability and durability were generally undertaken at the national level and (3) the introduction of the concept of robustness to illustrate the property of adaptability enables the identification of trade‐offs among properties, but (4) issues of ecological degradation were difficult to address explicitly. We consider that the framework can make a useful contribution to policy making by framing the impact of a given intervention on SESs on the four key system properties. Yet, the framework provides a structure to make ex‐post assessment of SES management or to formulate assumptions about potential synergies/trade‐offs among impacts on system properties. However, we suggest using it as complementary to other policy impact assessment methods

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Domptail, Stephanie, Easdale, Marcos Horacio, Yuerlita
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Wiley 2013-02
Subjects:Ecosistema, Sostenibilidad, Resiliencia frente a Impactos y Crisis, Indicadores Sociales, Ecosystems, Sustainability, Resilience, Social Indicators, Sustentabilidad,
Online Access:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.1604
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4927
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1604
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-4927
record_format koha
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-49272019-04-17T12:21:13Z Managing Socio‐Ecological Systems to Achieve Sustainability: A Study of Resilience and Robustness Domptail, Stephanie Easdale, Marcos Horacio Yuerlita Ecosistema Sostenibilidad Resiliencia frente a Impactos y Crisis Indicadores Sociales Ecosystems Sustainability Resilience Social Indicators Sustentabilidad Growing symptoms of the mismanagement of socio‐ecological systems (SESs) show that the long‐term existence of these systems is threatened. SES management improvement is the aim of many policy measures. But how successful are these various simultaneous policy measures in achieving the sustainable management of SESs? A framework for analysing policy measures and the management actions of land users was developed by Leach et al. (2010): the authors postulate that the sustainability of an SES depends on four system properties – stability, resilience, durability and robustness – and that external shocks and stresses affect these properties differently. The aim of this contribution is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the approach by applying it to three case studies, in Namibia, Argentina and Indonesia. We found that (1) more actions were directed towards resilience and robustness than towards command and control, (2) actions directed at stability and durability were generally undertaken at the national level and (3) the introduction of the concept of robustness to illustrate the property of adaptability enables the identification of trade‐offs among properties, but (4) issues of ecological degradation were difficult to address explicitly. We consider that the framework can make a useful contribution to policy making by framing the impact of a given intervention on SESs on the four key system properties. Yet, the framework provides a structure to make ex‐post assessment of SES management or to formulate assumptions about potential synergies/trade‐offs among impacts on system properties. However, we suggest using it as complementary to other policy impact assessment methods EEA Bariloche Fil: Domptail, Stephanie. Justus Liebig University of Giessen. Institute for Agricultural Policy and Market Research; Alemania Fil: Easdale, Marcos Horacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina Fil: Yuerlita. Andalas University. kampus Unand Limau Manis; Indonesia 2019-04-17T12:19:47Z 2019-04-17T12:19:47Z 2013-02 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.1604 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4927 1756-932X 1756-9338 https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1604 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Wiley Environmental Policy and Governance 23 (1) : 30-45 (January-February 2013)
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Ecosistema
Sostenibilidad
Resiliencia frente a Impactos y Crisis
Indicadores Sociales
Ecosystems
Sustainability
Resilience
Social Indicators
Sustentabilidad
Ecosistema
Sostenibilidad
Resiliencia frente a Impactos y Crisis
Indicadores Sociales
Ecosystems
Sustainability
Resilience
Social Indicators
Sustentabilidad
spellingShingle Ecosistema
Sostenibilidad
Resiliencia frente a Impactos y Crisis
Indicadores Sociales
Ecosystems
Sustainability
Resilience
Social Indicators
Sustentabilidad
Ecosistema
Sostenibilidad
Resiliencia frente a Impactos y Crisis
Indicadores Sociales
Ecosystems
Sustainability
Resilience
Social Indicators
Sustentabilidad
Domptail, Stephanie
Easdale, Marcos Horacio
Yuerlita
Managing Socio‐Ecological Systems to Achieve Sustainability: A Study of Resilience and Robustness
description Growing symptoms of the mismanagement of socio‐ecological systems (SESs) show that the long‐term existence of these systems is threatened. SES management improvement is the aim of many policy measures. But how successful are these various simultaneous policy measures in achieving the sustainable management of SESs? A framework for analysing policy measures and the management actions of land users was developed by Leach et al. (2010): the authors postulate that the sustainability of an SES depends on four system properties – stability, resilience, durability and robustness – and that external shocks and stresses affect these properties differently. The aim of this contribution is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the approach by applying it to three case studies, in Namibia, Argentina and Indonesia. We found that (1) more actions were directed towards resilience and robustness than towards command and control, (2) actions directed at stability and durability were generally undertaken at the national level and (3) the introduction of the concept of robustness to illustrate the property of adaptability enables the identification of trade‐offs among properties, but (4) issues of ecological degradation were difficult to address explicitly. We consider that the framework can make a useful contribution to policy making by framing the impact of a given intervention on SESs on the four key system properties. Yet, the framework provides a structure to make ex‐post assessment of SES management or to formulate assumptions about potential synergies/trade‐offs among impacts on system properties. However, we suggest using it as complementary to other policy impact assessment methods
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
topic_facet Ecosistema
Sostenibilidad
Resiliencia frente a Impactos y Crisis
Indicadores Sociales
Ecosystems
Sustainability
Resilience
Social Indicators
Sustentabilidad
author Domptail, Stephanie
Easdale, Marcos Horacio
Yuerlita
author_facet Domptail, Stephanie
Easdale, Marcos Horacio
Yuerlita
author_sort Domptail, Stephanie
title Managing Socio‐Ecological Systems to Achieve Sustainability: A Study of Resilience and Robustness
title_short Managing Socio‐Ecological Systems to Achieve Sustainability: A Study of Resilience and Robustness
title_full Managing Socio‐Ecological Systems to Achieve Sustainability: A Study of Resilience and Robustness
title_fullStr Managing Socio‐Ecological Systems to Achieve Sustainability: A Study of Resilience and Robustness
title_full_unstemmed Managing Socio‐Ecological Systems to Achieve Sustainability: A Study of Resilience and Robustness
title_sort managing socio‐ecological systems to achieve sustainability: a study of resilience and robustness
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2013-02
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.1604
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4927
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1604
work_keys_str_mv AT domptailstephanie managingsocioecologicalsystemstoachievesustainabilityastudyofresilienceandrobustness
AT easdalemarcoshoracio managingsocioecologicalsystemstoachievesustainabilityastudyofresilienceandrobustness
AT yuerlita managingsocioecologicalsystemstoachievesustainabilityastudyofresilienceandrobustness
_version_ 1756007449948585984