Multiple-trait analyses improved the accurary of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine

Genomic prediction (GP) and genome-wide association (GWA) analyses are currently being employed to accelerate breeding cycles and to identify alleles or genomic regions of complex traits in forest trees species. Here, 1490 interior lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud. var. latifolia Engelm) trees from four open-pollinated progeny trials were genotyped with 25,099 SNPs, and phenotyped for 15 growth, wood quality, pest resistance, drought tolerance, and defense chemical (monoterpenes) traits. The main objectives of this study were to: (1) identify genetic markers associated with these traits and determine their genetic architecture, and to compare the marker detected by single- (ST) and multiple-trait (MT) GWA models; (2) evaluate and compare the accuracy and control of bias of the genomic predictions for these traits underlying different ST and MT parametric and non-parametric GP methods. GWA, ST and MT analyses were compared using a linear transformation of genomic breeding values from the respective genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. GP, ST and MT parametric and non-parametric (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, RKHS) models were compared in terms of prediction accuracy (PA) and control of bias. Results: MT-GWA analyses identified more significant associations than ST. Some SNPs showed potential pleiotropic effects. Averaging across traits, PA from the studied ST-GP models did not differ significantly from each other, with generally a slight superiority of the RKHS method. MT-GP models showed significantly higher PA (and lower bias) than the ST models, being generally the PA (bias) of the RKHS approach significantly higher (lower) than the GBLUP. Conclusions: The power of GWA and the accuracy of GP were improved when MT models were used in this lodgepole pine population. Given the number of GP and GWA models fitted and the traits assessed across four progeny trials, this work has produced the most comprehensive empirical genomic study across any lodgepole pine population to date.

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Cappa, Eduardo Pablo, Chen, Charles, Klutsch, Jennifer G., Azcona, Jaime Sebastián, Ratcliffe, Blaise, Wei, Xiaojing, Da Ros, Letitia, Ullah, Aziz, Liu, Yang, Benowicz, Andy, Sadoway, Shane, Mansfield, Shawn D., Erbilgin, Nadir, Thomas, Barb R., El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Langue:eng
Publié: BMC 2022-07-23
Sujets:Parámetros Genéticos, Genómica, Cambio Climático, Pinus, Genetic Parameters, Genomics, Climate Change, Quantitative Genetic Parameters, Genomic Prediction, Parámetros Genéticos Cuantitativos, Predicción Genómica, Genome Wide Association Analysis, Análisis de Asociación del Genoma Completo,
Accès en ligne:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13117
https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-13117
record_format koha
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Parámetros Genéticos
Genómica
Cambio Climático
Pinus
Genetic Parameters
Genomics
Climate Change
Quantitative Genetic Parameters
Genomic Prediction
Parámetros Genéticos Cuantitativos
Predicción Genómica
Genome Wide Association Analysis
Análisis de Asociación del Genoma Completo
Parámetros Genéticos
Genómica
Cambio Climático
Pinus
Genetic Parameters
Genomics
Climate Change
Quantitative Genetic Parameters
Genomic Prediction
Parámetros Genéticos Cuantitativos
Predicción Genómica
Genome Wide Association Analysis
Análisis de Asociación del Genoma Completo
spellingShingle Parámetros Genéticos
Genómica
Cambio Climático
Pinus
Genetic Parameters
Genomics
Climate Change
Quantitative Genetic Parameters
Genomic Prediction
Parámetros Genéticos Cuantitativos
Predicción Genómica
Genome Wide Association Analysis
Análisis de Asociación del Genoma Completo
Parámetros Genéticos
Genómica
Cambio Climático
Pinus
Genetic Parameters
Genomics
Climate Change
Quantitative Genetic Parameters
Genomic Prediction
Parámetros Genéticos Cuantitativos
Predicción Genómica
Genome Wide Association Analysis
Análisis de Asociación del Genoma Completo
Cappa, Eduardo Pablo
Chen, Charles
Klutsch, Jennifer G.
Azcona, Jaime Sebastián
Ratcliffe, Blaise
Wei, Xiaojing
Da Ros, Letitia
Ullah, Aziz
Liu, Yang
Benowicz, Andy
Sadoway, Shane
Mansfield, Shawn D.
Erbilgin, Nadir
Thomas, Barb R.
El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
Multiple-trait analyses improved the accurary of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine
description Genomic prediction (GP) and genome-wide association (GWA) analyses are currently being employed to accelerate breeding cycles and to identify alleles or genomic regions of complex traits in forest trees species. Here, 1490 interior lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud. var. latifolia Engelm) trees from four open-pollinated progeny trials were genotyped with 25,099 SNPs, and phenotyped for 15 growth, wood quality, pest resistance, drought tolerance, and defense chemical (monoterpenes) traits. The main objectives of this study were to: (1) identify genetic markers associated with these traits and determine their genetic architecture, and to compare the marker detected by single- (ST) and multiple-trait (MT) GWA models; (2) evaluate and compare the accuracy and control of bias of the genomic predictions for these traits underlying different ST and MT parametric and non-parametric GP methods. GWA, ST and MT analyses were compared using a linear transformation of genomic breeding values from the respective genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. GP, ST and MT parametric and non-parametric (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, RKHS) models were compared in terms of prediction accuracy (PA) and control of bias. Results: MT-GWA analyses identified more significant associations than ST. Some SNPs showed potential pleiotropic effects. Averaging across traits, PA from the studied ST-GP models did not differ significantly from each other, with generally a slight superiority of the RKHS method. MT-GP models showed significantly higher PA (and lower bias) than the ST models, being generally the PA (bias) of the RKHS approach significantly higher (lower) than the GBLUP. Conclusions: The power of GWA and the accuracy of GP were improved when MT models were used in this lodgepole pine population. Given the number of GP and GWA models fitted and the traits assessed across four progeny trials, this work has produced the most comprehensive empirical genomic study across any lodgepole pine population to date.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
topic_facet Parámetros Genéticos
Genómica
Cambio Climático
Pinus
Genetic Parameters
Genomics
Climate Change
Quantitative Genetic Parameters
Genomic Prediction
Parámetros Genéticos Cuantitativos
Predicción Genómica
Genome Wide Association Analysis
Análisis de Asociación del Genoma Completo
author Cappa, Eduardo Pablo
Chen, Charles
Klutsch, Jennifer G.
Azcona, Jaime Sebastián
Ratcliffe, Blaise
Wei, Xiaojing
Da Ros, Letitia
Ullah, Aziz
Liu, Yang
Benowicz, Andy
Sadoway, Shane
Mansfield, Shawn D.
Erbilgin, Nadir
Thomas, Barb R.
El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
author_facet Cappa, Eduardo Pablo
Chen, Charles
Klutsch, Jennifer G.
Azcona, Jaime Sebastián
Ratcliffe, Blaise
Wei, Xiaojing
Da Ros, Letitia
Ullah, Aziz
Liu, Yang
Benowicz, Andy
Sadoway, Shane
Mansfield, Shawn D.
Erbilgin, Nadir
Thomas, Barb R.
El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
author_sort Cappa, Eduardo Pablo
title Multiple-trait analyses improved the accurary of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine
title_short Multiple-trait analyses improved the accurary of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine
title_full Multiple-trait analyses improved the accurary of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine
title_fullStr Multiple-trait analyses improved the accurary of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine
title_full_unstemmed Multiple-trait analyses improved the accurary of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine
title_sort multiple-trait analyses improved the accurary of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine
publisher BMC
publishDate 2022-07-23
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13117
https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7
work_keys_str_mv AT cappaeduardopablo multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT chencharles multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT klutschjenniferg multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT azconajaimesebastian multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT ratcliffeblaise multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT weixiaojing multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT darosletitia multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT ullahaziz multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT liuyang multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT benowiczandy multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT sadowayshane multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT mansfieldshawnd multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT erbilginnadir multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT thomasbarbr multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
AT elkassabyyousrya multipletraitanalysesimprovedtheaccuraryofgenomicpredictionandthepowerofgenomewideassociationofproductivityandclimatechangeadaptivetraitsinlodgepolepine
_version_ 1756008534104866816
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-131172022-10-14T11:33:29Z Multiple-trait analyses improved the accurary of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine Cappa, Eduardo Pablo Chen, Charles Klutsch, Jennifer G. Azcona, Jaime Sebastián Ratcliffe, Blaise Wei, Xiaojing Da Ros, Letitia Ullah, Aziz Liu, Yang Benowicz, Andy Sadoway, Shane Mansfield, Shawn D. Erbilgin, Nadir Thomas, Barb R. El-Kassaby, Yousry A. Parámetros Genéticos Genómica Cambio Climático Pinus Genetic Parameters Genomics Climate Change Quantitative Genetic Parameters Genomic Prediction Parámetros Genéticos Cuantitativos Predicción Genómica Genome Wide Association Analysis Análisis de Asociación del Genoma Completo Genomic prediction (GP) and genome-wide association (GWA) analyses are currently being employed to accelerate breeding cycles and to identify alleles or genomic regions of complex traits in forest trees species. Here, 1490 interior lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud. var. latifolia Engelm) trees from four open-pollinated progeny trials were genotyped with 25,099 SNPs, and phenotyped for 15 growth, wood quality, pest resistance, drought tolerance, and defense chemical (monoterpenes) traits. The main objectives of this study were to: (1) identify genetic markers associated with these traits and determine their genetic architecture, and to compare the marker detected by single- (ST) and multiple-trait (MT) GWA models; (2) evaluate and compare the accuracy and control of bias of the genomic predictions for these traits underlying different ST and MT parametric and non-parametric GP methods. GWA, ST and MT analyses were compared using a linear transformation of genomic breeding values from the respective genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. GP, ST and MT parametric and non-parametric (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, RKHS) models were compared in terms of prediction accuracy (PA) and control of bias. Results: MT-GWA analyses identified more significant associations than ST. Some SNPs showed potential pleiotropic effects. Averaging across traits, PA from the studied ST-GP models did not differ significantly from each other, with generally a slight superiority of the RKHS method. MT-GP models showed significantly higher PA (and lower bias) than the ST models, being generally the PA (bias) of the RKHS approach significantly higher (lower) than the GBLUP. Conclusions: The power of GWA and the accuracy of GP were improved when MT models were used in this lodgepole pine population. Given the number of GP and GWA models fitted and the traits assessed across four progeny trials, this work has produced the most comprehensive empirical genomic study across any lodgepole pine population to date. Fil: Cappa, Eduardo Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Chen, Charles. Oklahoma State University. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Estados Unidos Fil: Klutsch, Jenifer G. University of Alberta. Department of Renewable Resources; Canada Fil: Azcona, Jaime Sebastián. University of Alberta. Department of Renewable Resources; Canadá. Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla; España Fil: Rateliffe, Blaise. University of British Columbia. Faculty of Forestry. Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences; Canadá Fil: Wei, Xiaojimg. University of Alberta. Department of Renewable Resources; Canadá Fil: Da Ros, Letitia. University of British Columbia. Faculty of Forestry. Department of Wood Science; Canadá Fil: Ullah, Aziz. University of Alberta. Department of Renewable Resources; Canadá Fil: Liu, Yang. University of British Columbia. Faculty of Forestry. Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences; Canadá Fil: Benowicz, Andy. Alberta Agriculture and Forestry. Forest Stewardship and Trade Branch; Canadá Fil: Sadoway, Shane. Blue Ridge Lumber Inc.; Canadá Fil: Mansfield, Shawn D. University of British Columbia. Faculty of Forestry. Department of Wood Science; Canadá Fil: Erbilgin, Nadir. University of Alberta. Department of Renewable Resources; Canadá Fil: Thomas, Barb R. University of Alberta. Department of Renewable Resources; Canada Fil: El-Kassaby, Yousry A. University of British Columbia. Faculty of Forestry. Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences; Canadá 2022-10-14T11:19:29Z 2022-10-14T11:19:29Z 2022-07-23 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13117 https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7 1471-2164 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf BMC BMC Genomics 23 : 536 (2022)