Efficiency and Equity in Urban Flood Management Policies

Flood exposure is likely to increase in the future as a direct consequence of more frequent and more intense flooding and the growth of populations and economic assets in flood-prone areas. Low-income households, which are more likely to be located in high-risk zones, will be particularly affected. This paper assesses the welfare and equity impacts of three flood management policies—risk-based insurance, zoning, and subsidized insurance—using an urban economics framework with two income groups and three potential flood locations. The paper shows that in a first-best setting, risk-based insurance maximizes social welfare. However, depending on flood characteristics, implementing a zoning policy or subsidized insurance is close to optimal and can be more feasible. Subsidizing insurance reduces upward pressure on housing rents but increases flood damage, and is recommended for rare floods occurring in a large part of a city. Zoning policies have the opposite effect, avoiding damage but increasing housing rents, and are recommended for frequent floods in small areas. The social welfare impact of choosing the wrong flood management policy depends on the location of floods relative to employment centers, with flooding close to employment centers being particularly harmful. Implementing flood management policies redistributes flood costs between high- and low-income households through land markets, irrespective of who is directly affected. As such, they are progressive in terms of equity, compared to a laissez-faire scenario with myopic anticipations, in the more common scenario where poorer populations are more exposed to urban floods. But their impacts on inequality depend on flood locations and urban configuration. For instance, in a city where floods are centrally located and low-income households live in the city center, subsidized insurance would mitigate a surge in inequality, whereas a zoning policy could substantially increase inequalities.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liotta, Charlotte, Avner, Paolo, Hallegatte, Stéphane
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2023-02-13T21:13:16Z
Subjects:DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT, URBAN FLOODS, URBAN ECONOMICS, LAND USE ZONING, SUBSIDIZED INSURANCE, RISK-BASED INSURANCE, WELFARE, INEQUALITY, CLIMATE CHANGE,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099527102062332327/IDU0e0eee23a036c7040f20898009edeafa81b36
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39409
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098639409
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986394092023-11-14T21:49:19Z Efficiency and Equity in Urban Flood Management Policies A Systematic Urban Economics Exploration Liotta, Charlotte Avner, Paolo Hallegatte, Stéphane Avner, Paolo DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT URBAN FLOODS URBAN ECONOMICS LAND USE ZONING SUBSIDIZED INSURANCE RISK-BASED INSURANCE WELFARE INEQUALITY CLIMATE CHANGE Flood exposure is likely to increase in the future as a direct consequence of more frequent and more intense flooding and the growth of populations and economic assets in flood-prone areas. Low-income households, which are more likely to be located in high-risk zones, will be particularly affected. This paper assesses the welfare and equity impacts of three flood management policies—risk-based insurance, zoning, and subsidized insurance—using an urban economics framework with two income groups and three potential flood locations. The paper shows that in a first-best setting, risk-based insurance maximizes social welfare. However, depending on flood characteristics, implementing a zoning policy or subsidized insurance is close to optimal and can be more feasible. Subsidizing insurance reduces upward pressure on housing rents but increases flood damage, and is recommended for rare floods occurring in a large part of a city. Zoning policies have the opposite effect, avoiding damage but increasing housing rents, and are recommended for frequent floods in small areas. The social welfare impact of choosing the wrong flood management policy depends on the location of floods relative to employment centers, with flooding close to employment centers being particularly harmful. Implementing flood management policies redistributes flood costs between high- and low-income households through land markets, irrespective of who is directly affected. As such, they are progressive in terms of equity, compared to a laissez-faire scenario with myopic anticipations, in the more common scenario where poorer populations are more exposed to urban floods. But their impacts on inequality depend on flood locations and urban configuration. For instance, in a city where floods are centrally located and low-income households live in the city center, subsidized insurance would mitigate a surge in inequality, whereas a zoning policy could substantially increase inequalities. 2023-02-13T21:13:16Z 2023-03-06T15:50:54Z 2023-02-13T21:13:16Z 2023-03-06T15:50:54Z 2023-02 Working Paper Document de travail Documento de trabajo http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099527102062332327/IDU0e0eee23a036c7040f20898009edeafa81b36 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39409 English en Policy Research Working Papers;10292 CC BY 3.0 IGO World Bank http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
English
topic DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
URBAN FLOODS
URBAN ECONOMICS
LAND USE ZONING
SUBSIDIZED INSURANCE
RISK-BASED INSURANCE
WELFARE
INEQUALITY
CLIMATE CHANGE
DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
URBAN FLOODS
URBAN ECONOMICS
LAND USE ZONING
SUBSIDIZED INSURANCE
RISK-BASED INSURANCE
WELFARE
INEQUALITY
CLIMATE CHANGE
spellingShingle DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
URBAN FLOODS
URBAN ECONOMICS
LAND USE ZONING
SUBSIDIZED INSURANCE
RISK-BASED INSURANCE
WELFARE
INEQUALITY
CLIMATE CHANGE
DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
URBAN FLOODS
URBAN ECONOMICS
LAND USE ZONING
SUBSIDIZED INSURANCE
RISK-BASED INSURANCE
WELFARE
INEQUALITY
CLIMATE CHANGE
Liotta, Charlotte
Avner, Paolo
Hallegatte, Stéphane
Avner, Paolo
Efficiency and Equity in Urban Flood Management Policies
description Flood exposure is likely to increase in the future as a direct consequence of more frequent and more intense flooding and the growth of populations and economic assets in flood-prone areas. Low-income households, which are more likely to be located in high-risk zones, will be particularly affected. This paper assesses the welfare and equity impacts of three flood management policies—risk-based insurance, zoning, and subsidized insurance—using an urban economics framework with two income groups and three potential flood locations. The paper shows that in a first-best setting, risk-based insurance maximizes social welfare. However, depending on flood characteristics, implementing a zoning policy or subsidized insurance is close to optimal and can be more feasible. Subsidizing insurance reduces upward pressure on housing rents but increases flood damage, and is recommended for rare floods occurring in a large part of a city. Zoning policies have the opposite effect, avoiding damage but increasing housing rents, and are recommended for frequent floods in small areas. The social welfare impact of choosing the wrong flood management policy depends on the location of floods relative to employment centers, with flooding close to employment centers being particularly harmful. Implementing flood management policies redistributes flood costs between high- and low-income households through land markets, irrespective of who is directly affected. As such, they are progressive in terms of equity, compared to a laissez-faire scenario with myopic anticipations, in the more common scenario where poorer populations are more exposed to urban floods. But their impacts on inequality depend on flood locations and urban configuration. For instance, in a city where floods are centrally located and low-income households live in the city center, subsidized insurance would mitigate a surge in inequality, whereas a zoning policy could substantially increase inequalities.
format Working Paper
topic_facet DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
URBAN FLOODS
URBAN ECONOMICS
LAND USE ZONING
SUBSIDIZED INSURANCE
RISK-BASED INSURANCE
WELFARE
INEQUALITY
CLIMATE CHANGE
author Liotta, Charlotte
Avner, Paolo
Hallegatte, Stéphane
Avner, Paolo
author_facet Liotta, Charlotte
Avner, Paolo
Hallegatte, Stéphane
Avner, Paolo
author_sort Liotta, Charlotte
title Efficiency and Equity in Urban Flood Management Policies
title_short Efficiency and Equity in Urban Flood Management Policies
title_full Efficiency and Equity in Urban Flood Management Policies
title_fullStr Efficiency and Equity in Urban Flood Management Policies
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency and Equity in Urban Flood Management Policies
title_sort efficiency and equity in urban flood management policies
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2023-02-13T21:13:16Z
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099527102062332327/IDU0e0eee23a036c7040f20898009edeafa81b36
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39409
work_keys_str_mv AT liottacharlotte efficiencyandequityinurbanfloodmanagementpolicies
AT avnerpaolo efficiencyandequityinurbanfloodmanagementpolicies
AT hallegattestephane efficiencyandequityinurbanfloodmanagementpolicies
AT avnerpaolo efficiencyandequityinurbanfloodmanagementpolicies
AT liottacharlotte asystematicurbaneconomicsexploration
AT avnerpaolo asystematicurbaneconomicsexploration
AT hallegattestephane asystematicurbaneconomicsexploration
AT avnerpaolo asystematicurbaneconomicsexploration
_version_ 1787227651585343488