Farm decision making and gender: Results from a randomized experiment in Ecuador

Substantial resources have been devoted to mitigating the asset gender gap in developing country agriculture. Efforts have been taken to understand the role of women in decision making and in farm operations. Recommendations for best practices in eliciting information on women's roles have emphasized the importance of sex-disaggregated data collection and analysis. Collection of sex-disaggregated data is not straightforward and careful attention to context is needed. In Ecuador's highlands, chemical use in agriculture is widespread, and outreach and training programs to reduce this use are essential. These programs should target the appropriate decision makers. This paper presents results from a field experiment conducted in the Ecuador highlands where responding farm households are randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (i) a male respondent, (ii) a female respondent, and (iii) both adult male and female respondents (interviewed separately, but with knowledge that the other would also be interviewed). We assess whether treatment assignment affects responses to questions about decision making and responsibility for agricultural activities. Perceptions about household decision making and who is responsible for agricultural activities vary substantially by type of respondent. Men are more likely to claim sole responsibility; women are more likely to claim responsibility or that decisions are jointly made. In households where both man and woman were interviewed (separately) we found stark differences in responses about responsibilities, with men claiming sole responsibility at higher rates. Interviewing both members led to less divergence in responses, but large differences in perceptions about responsibilities remain when both are interviewed. Best interviewing practices depend on the type of information needed: for precise quantification of gender roles, complex methods may be necessary, but where qualitative information is sufficient, single-member interviews may be sufficient.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alwang, Jeffrey, Larochelle, Catherine, Barrera, Víctor Hugo
Format: Journal articles biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2017-04
Subjects:GÉNERO HUMANO, ENCUESTA DE DISEÑO, ENSAYO DE CONTROL ALEATORIO, MANEJO INTEGRADO DE PLAGAS, ECUADOR,
Online Access:http://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/4639
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-iniap-41000-4639
record_format koha
spelling dig-iniap-41000-46392023-11-18T13:42:54Z Farm decision making and gender: Results from a randomized experiment in Ecuador World Development 92:117-129 Alwang, Jeffrey Larochelle, Catherine Barrera, Víctor Hugo GÉNERO HUMANO ENCUESTA DE DISEÑO ENSAYO DE CONTROL ALEATORIO MANEJO INTEGRADO DE PLAGAS ECUADOR Substantial resources have been devoted to mitigating the asset gender gap in developing country agriculture. Efforts have been taken to understand the role of women in decision making and in farm operations. Recommendations for best practices in eliciting information on women's roles have emphasized the importance of sex-disaggregated data collection and analysis. Collection of sex-disaggregated data is not straightforward and careful attention to context is needed. In Ecuador's highlands, chemical use in agriculture is widespread, and outreach and training programs to reduce this use are essential. These programs should target the appropriate decision makers. This paper presents results from a field experiment conducted in the Ecuador highlands where responding farm households are randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (i) a male respondent, (ii) a female respondent, and (iii) both adult male and female respondents (interviewed separately, but with knowledge that the other would also be interviewed). We assess whether treatment assignment affects responses to questions about decision making and responsibility for agricultural activities. Perceptions about household decision making and who is responsible for agricultural activities vary substantially by type of respondent. Men are more likely to claim sole responsibility; women are more likely to claim responsibility or that decisions are jointly made. In households where both man and woman were interviewed (separately) we found stark differences in responses about responsibilities, with men claiming sole responsibility at higher rates. Interviewing both members led to less divergence in responses, but large differences in perceptions about responsibilities remain when both are interviewed. Best interviewing practices depend on the type of information needed: for precise quantification of gender roles, complex methods may be necessary, but where qualitative information is sufficient, single-member interviews may be sufficient. 2017-09-20T20:05:29Z 2017-09-20T20:05:29Z 2017-04 Revista Artículo 0305750X *EC-INIAP-BEESC-MGC. Quito (World Development 92:117-129. 2017CD) http://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/4639 en p. 117-129 application/pdf E. E. Santa Catalina
institution INIAP
collection DSpace
country Ecuador
countrycode EC
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-iniap
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca INIAP
language English
topic GÉNERO HUMANO
ENCUESTA DE DISEÑO
ENSAYO DE CONTROL ALEATORIO
MANEJO INTEGRADO DE PLAGAS
ECUADOR
GÉNERO HUMANO
ENCUESTA DE DISEÑO
ENSAYO DE CONTROL ALEATORIO
MANEJO INTEGRADO DE PLAGAS
ECUADOR
spellingShingle GÉNERO HUMANO
ENCUESTA DE DISEÑO
ENSAYO DE CONTROL ALEATORIO
MANEJO INTEGRADO DE PLAGAS
ECUADOR
GÉNERO HUMANO
ENCUESTA DE DISEÑO
ENSAYO DE CONTROL ALEATORIO
MANEJO INTEGRADO DE PLAGAS
ECUADOR
Alwang, Jeffrey
Larochelle, Catherine
Barrera, Víctor Hugo
Farm decision making and gender: Results from a randomized experiment in Ecuador
description Substantial resources have been devoted to mitigating the asset gender gap in developing country agriculture. Efforts have been taken to understand the role of women in decision making and in farm operations. Recommendations for best practices in eliciting information on women's roles have emphasized the importance of sex-disaggregated data collection and analysis. Collection of sex-disaggregated data is not straightforward and careful attention to context is needed. In Ecuador's highlands, chemical use in agriculture is widespread, and outreach and training programs to reduce this use are essential. These programs should target the appropriate decision makers. This paper presents results from a field experiment conducted in the Ecuador highlands where responding farm households are randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (i) a male respondent, (ii) a female respondent, and (iii) both adult male and female respondents (interviewed separately, but with knowledge that the other would also be interviewed). We assess whether treatment assignment affects responses to questions about decision making and responsibility for agricultural activities. Perceptions about household decision making and who is responsible for agricultural activities vary substantially by type of respondent. Men are more likely to claim sole responsibility; women are more likely to claim responsibility or that decisions are jointly made. In households where both man and woman were interviewed (separately) we found stark differences in responses about responsibilities, with men claiming sole responsibility at higher rates. Interviewing both members led to less divergence in responses, but large differences in perceptions about responsibilities remain when both are interviewed. Best interviewing practices depend on the type of information needed: for precise quantification of gender roles, complex methods may be necessary, but where qualitative information is sufficient, single-member interviews may be sufficient.
format Revista
topic_facet GÉNERO HUMANO
ENCUESTA DE DISEÑO
ENSAYO DE CONTROL ALEATORIO
MANEJO INTEGRADO DE PLAGAS
ECUADOR
author Alwang, Jeffrey
Larochelle, Catherine
Barrera, Víctor Hugo
author_facet Alwang, Jeffrey
Larochelle, Catherine
Barrera, Víctor Hugo
author_sort Alwang, Jeffrey
title Farm decision making and gender: Results from a randomized experiment in Ecuador
title_short Farm decision making and gender: Results from a randomized experiment in Ecuador
title_full Farm decision making and gender: Results from a randomized experiment in Ecuador
title_fullStr Farm decision making and gender: Results from a randomized experiment in Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Farm decision making and gender: Results from a randomized experiment in Ecuador
title_sort farm decision making and gender: results from a randomized experiment in ecuador
publishDate 2017-04
url http://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/4639
work_keys_str_mv AT alwangjeffrey farmdecisionmakingandgenderresultsfromarandomizedexperimentinecuador
AT larochellecatherine farmdecisionmakingandgenderresultsfromarandomizedexperimentinecuador
AT barreravictorhugo farmdecisionmakingandgenderresultsfromarandomizedexperimentinecuador
AT alwangjeffrey worlddevelopment92117129
AT larochellecatherine worlddevelopment92117129
AT barreravictorhugo worlddevelopment92117129
_version_ 1787226694310952960