Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers

A challenge when predicting total genetic values for complex quantitative traits is that an unknown number of quantitative trait loci may affect phenotypes via cryptic interactions. If markers are available, assuming that their effects on phenotypes are additive may lead to poor predictive ability. Non-parametric radial basis function (RBF) regression, which does not assume a particular form of the genotype-phenotype relationship, was investigated here by simulation and analysis of body weight and food conversion rate data in broilers. The simulation included a toy example in which an arbitrary non-linear genotype-phenotype relationship was assumed, and five different scenarios representing different broad sense heritability levels (01, 025, 05, 075 and 09) were created. In addition, a whole genome simulation was carried out, in which three different gene action modes (pure additive, additive+dominance and pure epistasis) were considered. In all analyses, a training set was used to fit the model and a testing set was used to evaluate predictive performance. The latter was measured by correlation and predictive mean-squared error (PMSE) on the testing data. For comparison, a linear additive model known as Bayes A was used as benchmark. Two RBF models with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-specific (RBF I) and common (RBF II) weights were examined. Results indicated that, in the presence of complex genotype-phenotype relationships (i.e. non-linearity and non-additivity), RBF outperformed Bayes A in predicting total genetic values using SNP markers. Extension of Bayes A to include all additive, dominance and epistatic effects could improve its prediction accuracy. RBF I was generally better than RBF II, and was able to identify relevant SNPs in the toy example. © 2010 Cambridge University Press.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Long, N., Gianola, D., Rosa, G. J. M., Weigel, K. A., Kranis, A., González-Recio, O.
Format: journal article biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/2416
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-inia-es-20.500.12792-2416
record_format koha
spelling dig-inia-es-20.500.12792-24162020-12-15T09:47:54Z Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers Long, N. Gianola, D. Rosa, G. J. M. Weigel, K. A. Kranis, A. González-Recio, O. A challenge when predicting total genetic values for complex quantitative traits is that an unknown number of quantitative trait loci may affect phenotypes via cryptic interactions. If markers are available, assuming that their effects on phenotypes are additive may lead to poor predictive ability. Non-parametric radial basis function (RBF) regression, which does not assume a particular form of the genotype-phenotype relationship, was investigated here by simulation and analysis of body weight and food conversion rate data in broilers. The simulation included a toy example in which an arbitrary non-linear genotype-phenotype relationship was assumed, and five different scenarios representing different broad sense heritability levels (01, 025, 05, 075 and 09) were created. In addition, a whole genome simulation was carried out, in which three different gene action modes (pure additive, additive+dominance and pure epistasis) were considered. In all analyses, a training set was used to fit the model and a testing set was used to evaluate predictive performance. The latter was measured by correlation and predictive mean-squared error (PMSE) on the testing data. For comparison, a linear additive model known as Bayes A was used as benchmark. Two RBF models with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-specific (RBF I) and common (RBF II) weights were examined. Results indicated that, in the presence of complex genotype-phenotype relationships (i.e. non-linearity and non-additivity), RBF outperformed Bayes A in predicting total genetic values using SNP markers. Extension of Bayes A to include all additive, dominance and epistatic effects could improve its prediction accuracy. RBF I was generally better than RBF II, and was able to identify relevant SNPs in the toy example. © 2010 Cambridge University Press. 2020-10-22T12:57:13Z 2020-10-22T12:57:13Z 2010 journal article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/2416 10.1017/S0016672310000157 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ open access
institution INIA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inia-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del INIA España
language eng
description A challenge when predicting total genetic values for complex quantitative traits is that an unknown number of quantitative trait loci may affect phenotypes via cryptic interactions. If markers are available, assuming that their effects on phenotypes are additive may lead to poor predictive ability. Non-parametric radial basis function (RBF) regression, which does not assume a particular form of the genotype-phenotype relationship, was investigated here by simulation and analysis of body weight and food conversion rate data in broilers. The simulation included a toy example in which an arbitrary non-linear genotype-phenotype relationship was assumed, and five different scenarios representing different broad sense heritability levels (01, 025, 05, 075 and 09) were created. In addition, a whole genome simulation was carried out, in which three different gene action modes (pure additive, additive+dominance and pure epistasis) were considered. In all analyses, a training set was used to fit the model and a testing set was used to evaluate predictive performance. The latter was measured by correlation and predictive mean-squared error (PMSE) on the testing data. For comparison, a linear additive model known as Bayes A was used as benchmark. Two RBF models with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-specific (RBF I) and common (RBF II) weights were examined. Results indicated that, in the presence of complex genotype-phenotype relationships (i.e. non-linearity and non-additivity), RBF outperformed Bayes A in predicting total genetic values using SNP markers. Extension of Bayes A to include all additive, dominance and epistatic effects could improve its prediction accuracy. RBF I was generally better than RBF II, and was able to identify relevant SNPs in the toy example. © 2010 Cambridge University Press.
format journal article
author Long, N.
Gianola, D.
Rosa, G. J. M.
Weigel, K. A.
Kranis, A.
González-Recio, O.
spellingShingle Long, N.
Gianola, D.
Rosa, G. J. M.
Weigel, K. A.
Kranis, A.
González-Recio, O.
Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers
author_facet Long, N.
Gianola, D.
Rosa, G. J. M.
Weigel, K. A.
Kranis, A.
González-Recio, O.
author_sort Long, N.
title Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers
title_short Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers
title_full Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers
title_fullStr Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers
title_full_unstemmed Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers
title_sort radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using snp markers
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/2416
work_keys_str_mv AT longn radialbasisfunctionregressionmethodsforpredictingquantitativetraitsusingsnpmarkers
AT gianolad radialbasisfunctionregressionmethodsforpredictingquantitativetraitsusingsnpmarkers
AT rosagjm radialbasisfunctionregressionmethodsforpredictingquantitativetraitsusingsnpmarkers
AT weigelka radialbasisfunctionregressionmethodsforpredictingquantitativetraitsusingsnpmarkers
AT kranisa radialbasisfunctionregressionmethodsforpredictingquantitativetraitsusingsnpmarkers
AT gonzalezrecioo radialbasisfunctionregressionmethodsforpredictingquantitativetraitsusingsnpmarkers
_version_ 1758004985716539392