Intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Populus based on AFLP markers

Although Populus has become the model genus for molecular genetics and genomics research on forest trees, genetic and phylogenetic relationships within this genus have not yet been comprehensively studied at the molecular level. By using 151 AFLP® (AFLP® is a registered trademark of Keygene) markers, 178 accessions belonging to 25 poplar species and three interspecific hybrids were analyzed, using three accessions belonging to two willow species as outgroups. The genetic and phylogenetic relationships were generally consistent with the known taxonomy, although notable exceptions were observed. A dendrogram as well as a single most parsimonious tree, ordered the Populus sections from the oldest Leuce to the latest Aigeiros, a pattern consistent with their known evolutionary relationships. A close relationship between Populus deltoides of the Aigeiros section and species of the Tacamahaca section was observed and, with the exception of Populus wilsonii, between the species of the Leucoides, Tacamahaca, and Aigeiros sections. Populus nigra was clearly separated from its consectional P. deltoides, and should be classified separately from P. deltoides. The AFLP profiles pointed out to the lack of divergence between some species and revealed that some accessions corresponded with interspecific hybrids. This molecular study provides useful information about genetic relationships among several Populus species and, together with morphological descriptions and crossability, it may help review and update systematic classification within the Populus genus.

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cervera, M. T., Storme, V., Soto, A., Ivens, B., Van Montagu, M., Rajora, O. P., Boerjan, W.
Formato: artículo biblioteca
Idioma:English
Publicado: Springer Nature 2005
Materias:AFLP fingerprinting, Populus, Genetic and phylogenetic relationships, Molecular systematics, Evolution,
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/5846
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/295170
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id dig-inia-es-10261-295170
record_format koha
spelling dig-inia-es-10261-2951702023-02-20T10:45:36Z Intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Populus based on AFLP markers Cervera, M. T. Storme, V. Soto, A. Ivens, B. Van Montagu, M. Rajora, O. P. Boerjan, W. AFLP fingerprinting Populus Genetic and phylogenetic relationships Molecular systematics Evolution Although Populus has become the model genus for molecular genetics and genomics research on forest trees, genetic and phylogenetic relationships within this genus have not yet been comprehensively studied at the molecular level. By using 151 AFLP® (AFLP® is a registered trademark of Keygene) markers, 178 accessions belonging to 25 poplar species and three interspecific hybrids were analyzed, using three accessions belonging to two willow species as outgroups. The genetic and phylogenetic relationships were generally consistent with the known taxonomy, although notable exceptions were observed. A dendrogram as well as a single most parsimonious tree, ordered the Populus sections from the oldest Leuce to the latest Aigeiros, a pattern consistent with their known evolutionary relationships. A close relationship between Populus deltoides of the Aigeiros section and species of the Tacamahaca section was observed and, with the exception of Populus wilsonii, between the species of the Leucoides, Tacamahaca, and Aigeiros sections. Populus nigra was clearly separated from its consectional P. deltoides, and should be classified separately from P. deltoides. The AFLP profiles pointed out to the lack of divergence between some species and revealed that some accessions corresponded with interspecific hybrids. This molecular study provides useful information about genetic relationships among several Populus species and, together with morphological descriptions and crossability, it may help review and update systematic classification within the Populus genus. 2023-02-20T10:45:36Z 2023-02-20T10:45:36Z 2005 artículo Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111: 1440-1456 (2005) 0040-5752 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/5846 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/295170 10.1007/s00122-005-0076-2 1432-2242 en none Springer Nature
institution INIA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inia-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del INIA España
language English
topic AFLP fingerprinting
Populus
Genetic and phylogenetic relationships
Molecular systematics
Evolution
AFLP fingerprinting
Populus
Genetic and phylogenetic relationships
Molecular systematics
Evolution
spellingShingle AFLP fingerprinting
Populus
Genetic and phylogenetic relationships
Molecular systematics
Evolution
AFLP fingerprinting
Populus
Genetic and phylogenetic relationships
Molecular systematics
Evolution
Cervera, M. T.
Storme, V.
Soto, A.
Ivens, B.
Van Montagu, M.
Rajora, O. P.
Boerjan, W.
Intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Populus based on AFLP markers
description Although Populus has become the model genus for molecular genetics and genomics research on forest trees, genetic and phylogenetic relationships within this genus have not yet been comprehensively studied at the molecular level. By using 151 AFLP® (AFLP® is a registered trademark of Keygene) markers, 178 accessions belonging to 25 poplar species and three interspecific hybrids were analyzed, using three accessions belonging to two willow species as outgroups. The genetic and phylogenetic relationships were generally consistent with the known taxonomy, although notable exceptions were observed. A dendrogram as well as a single most parsimonious tree, ordered the Populus sections from the oldest Leuce to the latest Aigeiros, a pattern consistent with their known evolutionary relationships. A close relationship between Populus deltoides of the Aigeiros section and species of the Tacamahaca section was observed and, with the exception of Populus wilsonii, between the species of the Leucoides, Tacamahaca, and Aigeiros sections. Populus nigra was clearly separated from its consectional P. deltoides, and should be classified separately from P. deltoides. The AFLP profiles pointed out to the lack of divergence between some species and revealed that some accessions corresponded with interspecific hybrids. This molecular study provides useful information about genetic relationships among several Populus species and, together with morphological descriptions and crossability, it may help review and update systematic classification within the Populus genus.
format artículo
topic_facet AFLP fingerprinting
Populus
Genetic and phylogenetic relationships
Molecular systematics
Evolution
author Cervera, M. T.
Storme, V.
Soto, A.
Ivens, B.
Van Montagu, M.
Rajora, O. P.
Boerjan, W.
author_facet Cervera, M. T.
Storme, V.
Soto, A.
Ivens, B.
Van Montagu, M.
Rajora, O. P.
Boerjan, W.
author_sort Cervera, M. T.
title Intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Populus based on AFLP markers
title_short Intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Populus based on AFLP markers
title_full Intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Populus based on AFLP markers
title_fullStr Intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Populus based on AFLP markers
title_full_unstemmed Intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Populus based on AFLP markers
title_sort intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus populus based on aflp markers
publisher Springer Nature
publishDate 2005
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/5846
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/295170
work_keys_str_mv AT cerveramt intraspecificandinterspecificgeneticandphylogeneticrelationshipsinthegenuspopulusbasedonaflpmarkers
AT stormev intraspecificandinterspecificgeneticandphylogeneticrelationshipsinthegenuspopulusbasedonaflpmarkers
AT sotoa intraspecificandinterspecificgeneticandphylogeneticrelationshipsinthegenuspopulusbasedonaflpmarkers
AT ivensb intraspecificandinterspecificgeneticandphylogeneticrelationshipsinthegenuspopulusbasedonaflpmarkers
AT vanmontagum intraspecificandinterspecificgeneticandphylogeneticrelationshipsinthegenuspopulusbasedonaflpmarkers
AT rajoraop intraspecificandinterspecificgeneticandphylogeneticrelationshipsinthegenuspopulusbasedonaflpmarkers
AT boerjanw intraspecificandinterspecificgeneticandphylogeneticrelationshipsinthegenuspopulusbasedonaflpmarkers
_version_ 1767603708491726848