What Ecohydrologic Separation Is and Where We Can Go With It

The “ecohydrologic separation” hypothesis challenged assumptions of translatory flow through the rooting zone. However, studies aiming to test ecohydrologic separation have largely done so with insufficient discussion of infiltration and rooting zone recharge processes and instead have mostly focused on either isotopic differences between stream water and plant water or the presence of fractionated isotope ratios in plant water. Based on extensively observed heterogeneities in soils and watersheds, we posit that differences in isotopic compositions of water in plants, streams, and other subsurface pools are expected in most scenarios. Interpretation of those plant-and-stream water isotopic differences is important, but diagnosing the role of any specific process is typically confounded by the diversity of potential mechanisms contributing to those isotopic differences. Thus, we should progress from simply describing their occurrences and refocus the discussion of ecohydrologic separation on how heterogeneous infiltration and root uptake processes lead to such differences. Consequently, we outline areas where plant and soil-water stable isotope data may be useful for advancing our understanding and representation of soil-water transport and plant-water recharge.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sprenger, Matthias, Allen, Scott T.
Format: artículo biblioteca
Published: Wiley-VCH 2020
Subjects:Ecohydrologic Separation,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/233481
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-idaea-es-10261-233481
record_format koha
spelling dig-idaea-es-10261-2334812021-10-11T07:07:38Z What Ecohydrologic Separation Is and Where We Can Go With It Sprenger, Matthias Allen, Scott T. Ecohydrologic Separation The “ecohydrologic separation” hypothesis challenged assumptions of translatory flow through the rooting zone. However, studies aiming to test ecohydrologic separation have largely done so with insufficient discussion of infiltration and rooting zone recharge processes and instead have mostly focused on either isotopic differences between stream water and plant water or the presence of fractionated isotope ratios in plant water. Based on extensively observed heterogeneities in soils and watersheds, we posit that differences in isotopic compositions of water in plants, streams, and other subsurface pools are expected in most scenarios. Interpretation of those plant-and-stream water isotopic differences is important, but diagnosing the role of any specific process is typically confounded by the diversity of potential mechanisms contributing to those isotopic differences. Thus, we should progress from simply describing their occurrences and refocus the discussion of ecohydrologic separation on how heterogeneous infiltration and root uptake processes lead to such differences. Consequently, we outline areas where plant and soil-water stable isotope data may be useful for advancing our understanding and representation of soil-water transport and plant-water recharge. M.S. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project no. 397306994). This commentary was improved by comments from two anonymous reviewers, Editors Holly Barnard and Ilja van Meerveld, Todd Dawson, and Wouter Berghuijs, and has been influenced by conversations with Renee Brooks and many others. 2021-03-09T07:00:03Z 2021-03-09T07:00:03Z 2020 2021-03-09T07:00:04Z artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 doi: 10.1029/2020WR027238 issn: 1944-7973 Water Resources Research 56 (2020) http://hdl.handle.net/10261/233481 10.1029/2020WR027238 Postprint http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027238 Sí open Wiley-VCH
institution IDAEA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-idaea-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del IDAEA España
topic Ecohydrologic Separation
Ecohydrologic Separation
spellingShingle Ecohydrologic Separation
Ecohydrologic Separation
Sprenger, Matthias
Allen, Scott T.
What Ecohydrologic Separation Is and Where We Can Go With It
description The “ecohydrologic separation” hypothesis challenged assumptions of translatory flow through the rooting zone. However, studies aiming to test ecohydrologic separation have largely done so with insufficient discussion of infiltration and rooting zone recharge processes and instead have mostly focused on either isotopic differences between stream water and plant water or the presence of fractionated isotope ratios in plant water. Based on extensively observed heterogeneities in soils and watersheds, we posit that differences in isotopic compositions of water in plants, streams, and other subsurface pools are expected in most scenarios. Interpretation of those plant-and-stream water isotopic differences is important, but diagnosing the role of any specific process is typically confounded by the diversity of potential mechanisms contributing to those isotopic differences. Thus, we should progress from simply describing their occurrences and refocus the discussion of ecohydrologic separation on how heterogeneous infiltration and root uptake processes lead to such differences. Consequently, we outline areas where plant and soil-water stable isotope data may be useful for advancing our understanding and representation of soil-water transport and plant-water recharge.
format artículo
topic_facet Ecohydrologic Separation
author Sprenger, Matthias
Allen, Scott T.
author_facet Sprenger, Matthias
Allen, Scott T.
author_sort Sprenger, Matthias
title What Ecohydrologic Separation Is and Where We Can Go With It
title_short What Ecohydrologic Separation Is and Where We Can Go With It
title_full What Ecohydrologic Separation Is and Where We Can Go With It
title_fullStr What Ecohydrologic Separation Is and Where We Can Go With It
title_full_unstemmed What Ecohydrologic Separation Is and Where We Can Go With It
title_sort what ecohydrologic separation is and where we can go with it
publisher Wiley-VCH
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/233481
work_keys_str_mv AT sprengermatthias whatecohydrologicseparationisandwherewecangowithit
AT allenscottt whatecohydrologicseparationisandwherewecangowithit
_version_ 1777669508058578944