Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis

At the global scale, vineyards are usually managed intensively to optimize wine production without considering possible negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) such as high soil erosion rates, degradation of soil fertility or contamination of groundwater. Winegrowers regulate competition for water and nutrients between the vines and inter-row vegetation by tilling, mulching and/or herbicide application. Strategies for more sustainable viticulture recommend maintaining vegetation cover in inter-rows, however, there is a lack of knowledge as to what extent this less intensive inter-row management affects biodiversity and associated ES. We performed a hierarchical meta-analysis to quantify the effects of extensive vineyard inter-row vegetation management in comparison to more intensive management (like soil tillage or herbicide use) on biodiversity and ES from 74 studies covering four continents and 13 wine-producing countries. Overall, extensive vegetation management increased above- and below-ground biodiversity and ecosystem service provision by 20% in comparison to intensive management. Organic management together with management without herbicides showed a stronger positive effect on ES and biodiversity provision than inter-row soil tillage. Soil loss parameters showed the largest positive response to inter-row vegetation cover. The second highest positive response was observed for biodiversity variables, followed by carbon sequestration, pest control and soil fertility. We found no trade-off between grape yield and quality vs. biodiversity or other ES. Synthesis and applications. Our meta-analysis concludes that vegetation cover in inter-rows contributes to biodiversity conservation and provides multiple ecosystem services. However, in drier climates grape yield might decrease without irrigation and careful vegetation management. Agri-environmental policies should therefore focus on granting subsidies for the establishment of locally adapted diverse vegetation cover in vineyard inter-rows. Future studies should focus on analysing the combined effects of local vineyard management and landscape composition and advance research in wine-growing regions in Asia and in the southern hemisphere.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Winter, Silvia, Bauer, Thomas, Strauss, Peter, Kratschmer, Sophie, Paredes, Daniel, Popescu, Daniela, Landa, Blanca B., Guzmán, Gema, Gómez Calero, José Alfonso, Guernion, Muriel, Zaller, Johann G., Batáry, P.
Other Authors: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
Format: artículo biblioteca
Published: Blackwell Publishing 2018
Subjects:Tillage intensity, Vineyard, Soil erosion, Pest control, Biodiversity, Carbon sequestration, Ecosystem services, Meta-analysis,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/180222
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002428
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001665
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-ias-es-10261-180222
record_format koha
institution IAS ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-ias-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del IAS España
topic Tillage intensity
Vineyard
Soil erosion
Pest control
Biodiversity
Carbon sequestration
Ecosystem services
Meta-analysis
Tillage intensity
Vineyard
Soil erosion
Pest control
Biodiversity
Carbon sequestration
Ecosystem services
Meta-analysis
spellingShingle Tillage intensity
Vineyard
Soil erosion
Pest control
Biodiversity
Carbon sequestration
Ecosystem services
Meta-analysis
Tillage intensity
Vineyard
Soil erosion
Pest control
Biodiversity
Carbon sequestration
Ecosystem services
Meta-analysis
Winter, Silvia
Bauer, Thomas
Strauss, Peter
Kratschmer, Sophie
Paredes, Daniel
Popescu, Daniela
Landa, Blanca B.
Guzmán, Gema
Gómez Calero, José Alfonso
Guernion, Muriel
Zaller, Johann G.
Batáry, P.
Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis
description At the global scale, vineyards are usually managed intensively to optimize wine production without considering possible negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) such as high soil erosion rates, degradation of soil fertility or contamination of groundwater. Winegrowers regulate competition for water and nutrients between the vines and inter-row vegetation by tilling, mulching and/or herbicide application. Strategies for more sustainable viticulture recommend maintaining vegetation cover in inter-rows, however, there is a lack of knowledge as to what extent this less intensive inter-row management affects biodiversity and associated ES. We performed a hierarchical meta-analysis to quantify the effects of extensive vineyard inter-row vegetation management in comparison to more intensive management (like soil tillage or herbicide use) on biodiversity and ES from 74 studies covering four continents and 13 wine-producing countries. Overall, extensive vegetation management increased above- and below-ground biodiversity and ecosystem service provision by 20% in comparison to intensive management. Organic management together with management without herbicides showed a stronger positive effect on ES and biodiversity provision than inter-row soil tillage. Soil loss parameters showed the largest positive response to inter-row vegetation cover. The second highest positive response was observed for biodiversity variables, followed by carbon sequestration, pest control and soil fertility. We found no trade-off between grape yield and quality vs. biodiversity or other ES. Synthesis and applications. Our meta-analysis concludes that vegetation cover in inter-rows contributes to biodiversity conservation and provides multiple ecosystem services. However, in drier climates grape yield might decrease without irrigation and careful vegetation management. Agri-environmental policies should therefore focus on granting subsidies for the establishment of locally adapted diverse vegetation cover in vineyard inter-rows. Future studies should focus on analysing the combined effects of local vineyard management and landscape composition and advance research in wine-growing regions in Asia and in the southern hemisphere.
author2 Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
author_facet Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
Winter, Silvia
Bauer, Thomas
Strauss, Peter
Kratschmer, Sophie
Paredes, Daniel
Popescu, Daniela
Landa, Blanca B.
Guzmán, Gema
Gómez Calero, José Alfonso
Guernion, Muriel
Zaller, Johann G.
Batáry, P.
format artículo
topic_facet Tillage intensity
Vineyard
Soil erosion
Pest control
Biodiversity
Carbon sequestration
Ecosystem services
Meta-analysis
author Winter, Silvia
Bauer, Thomas
Strauss, Peter
Kratschmer, Sophie
Paredes, Daniel
Popescu, Daniela
Landa, Blanca B.
Guzmán, Gema
Gómez Calero, José Alfonso
Guernion, Muriel
Zaller, Johann G.
Batáry, P.
author_sort Winter, Silvia
title Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis
title_short Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis
title_full Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis
title_sort effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: a meta-analysis
publisher Blackwell Publishing
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/180222
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002428
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001665
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329
work_keys_str_mv AT wintersilvia effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT bauerthomas effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT strausspeter effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT kratschmersophie effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT paredesdaniel effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT popescudaniela effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT landablancab effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT guzmangema effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT gomezcalerojosealfonso effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT guernionmuriel effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT zallerjohanng effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT bataryp effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
_version_ 1777663236369285120
spelling dig-ias-es-10261-1802222021-12-27T16:40:32Z Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis Winter, Silvia Bauer, Thomas Strauss, Peter Kratschmer, Sophie Paredes, Daniel Popescu, Daniela Landa, Blanca B. Guzmán, Gema Gómez Calero, José Alfonso Guernion, Muriel Zaller, Johann G. Batáry, P. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany) Executive Unit for Financing Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation (Romania) National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Hungary) Austrian Science Fund Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España) Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France) Tillage intensity Vineyard Soil erosion Pest control Biodiversity Carbon sequestration Ecosystem services Meta-analysis At the global scale, vineyards are usually managed intensively to optimize wine production without considering possible negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) such as high soil erosion rates, degradation of soil fertility or contamination of groundwater. Winegrowers regulate competition for water and nutrients between the vines and inter-row vegetation by tilling, mulching and/or herbicide application. Strategies for more sustainable viticulture recommend maintaining vegetation cover in inter-rows, however, there is a lack of knowledge as to what extent this less intensive inter-row management affects biodiversity and associated ES. We performed a hierarchical meta-analysis to quantify the effects of extensive vineyard inter-row vegetation management in comparison to more intensive management (like soil tillage or herbicide use) on biodiversity and ES from 74 studies covering four continents and 13 wine-producing countries. Overall, extensive vegetation management increased above- and below-ground biodiversity and ecosystem service provision by 20% in comparison to intensive management. Organic management together with management without herbicides showed a stronger positive effect on ES and biodiversity provision than inter-row soil tillage. Soil loss parameters showed the largest positive response to inter-row vegetation cover. The second highest positive response was observed for biodiversity variables, followed by carbon sequestration, pest control and soil fertility. We found no trade-off between grape yield and quality vs. biodiversity or other ES. Synthesis and applications. Our meta-analysis concludes that vegetation cover in inter-rows contributes to biodiversity conservation and provides multiple ecosystem services. However, in drier climates grape yield might decrease without irrigation and careful vegetation management. Agri-environmental policies should therefore focus on granting subsidies for the establishment of locally adapted diverse vegetation cover in vineyard inter-rows. Future studies should focus on analysing the combined effects of local vineyard management and landscape composition and advance research in wine-growing regions in Asia and in the southern hemisphere. We thank all authors who provided additional data and information on request of the authors of this study. We sincerely thank three anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor Peter Manning for their constructive comments. This meta- analysis was conducted in the course of the project VineDivers (www.vinedivers.eu) funded through the 2013–2014 BiodivERsA/FACCE- JPI joint call for research proposals, with the national funders: Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (I 2044-B25), Spanish Ministry for Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), French National Research Agency (ANR), Romanian Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding (UEFISCDI) and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF/Germany). P.B. was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG BA4438/2- 1) and by the Economic Development and Innovation Operational Programme of Hungary (GINOP–2.3.2–15–2016–00019). Peer Reviewed 2019-04-17T06:45:36Z 2019-04-17T06:45:36Z 2018 2019-04-17T06:45:36Z artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13124 issn: 1365-2664 Journal of Applied Ecology 55: 2484- 2495 (2018) http://hdl.handle.net/10261/180222 10.1111/1365-2664.13124 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002428 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001665 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329 30147143 https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.13124 Sí open Blackwell Publishing