Trials on reducing the non-productive period at oil palm replanting.

Replanting posed a heavy cost that offsets profits from productive areas, due to the period with no income, as well as the actual cost. Good agronomy has reduced the immature period of oil palms in recent decades. Further possibilities have been investigated in a series of six trials reported here, which concern optimum idposal of the old stand, underplanting, and the field planting of more advanced planting materials (APM). A land clearing trials showed that leaving felled old palms on site costs only about a third of breaking them up mecanically, with or without burning. No disadvantage in growth of young palms nor in accessibility, was found. In an underplanting trial, underplanted palms grew slower, in correlation with the time and proportion of the old stand reamining. In all treatments the old stand completely felled within two years, and after 1 1/2 years of yielding production of the new palms was equalising. Total yield from both old and new stand was greater with retention of part of the old stand. With care, felling the old stand didn't damage the new. Longer retention in conventional nurseries in the older materials trial did not much improve speed to maturity. In the APM trial giant nuersey polybags and winder spacing gave bigger palms for field planting. At 6 months in the field, they have bunches in the best treatments. In transplanting feasibility and optimun age for transplanting trials, a special machine transplanted young field palms, offering possibilities of strategically locative advanced field nurseries. Work is proceeding to optimises this. Land preparation may rule out underplanting, but not use of APM. Pests and diseases generally appear not be limiting, but a precaution against Ganoderma, complete unearthing of the role of the old palms is recommended.The economics favour these techniques, which lead to other possible options, such as a shorter planting cycle.

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: 1987 International Oil Palm/Palm Oil Conference. Progress Prospects June23-26 : Kuala Lumpur : 43667., Loong, S.G. 41957., Nazeeb, Mohd 43659., Wood, B.J. 41291.
Formato: Texto biblioteca
Idioma:eng
Publicado: Kuala Lumpur : PORIM,
Materias:Costos., Cultivo intercalado., Elaeis guineensis., Ganoderma., Maduración., Siembra., Renovación de cultivos, Palma de aceite,
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id dig-fedepalma-123456789-74442
record_format koha
institution FEDEPALMA
collection DSpace
country Colombia
countrycode CO
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-fedepalma
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Centro de Información y Documentación Palmero
language eng
topic Costos.
Cultivo intercalado.
Elaeis guineensis.
Ganoderma.
Maduración.
Siembra.
Renovación de cultivos
Palma de aceite
Costos.
Cultivo intercalado.
Elaeis guineensis.
Ganoderma.
Maduración.
Siembra.
Renovación de cultivos
Palma de aceite
spellingShingle Costos.
Cultivo intercalado.
Elaeis guineensis.
Ganoderma.
Maduración.
Siembra.
Renovación de cultivos
Palma de aceite
Costos.
Cultivo intercalado.
Elaeis guineensis.
Ganoderma.
Maduración.
Siembra.
Renovación de cultivos
Palma de aceite
1987 International Oil Palm/Palm Oil Conference. Progress Prospects June23-26 : Kuala Lumpur : 43667.
Loong, S.G. 41957.
Nazeeb, Mohd 43659.
Wood, B.J. 41291.
Trials on reducing the non-productive period at oil palm replanting.
description Replanting posed a heavy cost that offsets profits from productive areas, due to the period with no income, as well as the actual cost. Good agronomy has reduced the immature period of oil palms in recent decades. Further possibilities have been investigated in a series of six trials reported here, which concern optimum idposal of the old stand, underplanting, and the field planting of more advanced planting materials (APM). A land clearing trials showed that leaving felled old palms on site costs only about a third of breaking them up mecanically, with or without burning. No disadvantage in growth of young palms nor in accessibility, was found. In an underplanting trial, underplanted palms grew slower, in correlation with the time and proportion of the old stand reamining. In all treatments the old stand completely felled within two years, and after 1 1/2 years of yielding production of the new palms was equalising. Total yield from both old and new stand was greater with retention of part of the old stand. With care, felling the old stand didn't damage the new. Longer retention in conventional nurseries in the older materials trial did not much improve speed to maturity. In the APM trial giant nuersey polybags and winder spacing gave bigger palms for field planting. At 6 months in the field, they have bunches in the best treatments. In transplanting feasibility and optimun age for transplanting trials, a special machine transplanted young field palms, offering possibilities of strategically locative advanced field nurseries. Work is proceeding to optimises this. Land preparation may rule out underplanting, but not use of APM. Pests and diseases generally appear not be limiting, but a precaution against Ganoderma, complete unearthing of the role of the old palms is recommended.The economics favour these techniques, which lead to other possible options, such as a shorter planting cycle.
format Texto
topic_facet Costos.
Cultivo intercalado.
Elaeis guineensis.
Ganoderma.
Maduración.
Siembra.
Renovación de cultivos
Palma de aceite
author 1987 International Oil Palm/Palm Oil Conference. Progress Prospects June23-26 : Kuala Lumpur : 43667.
Loong, S.G. 41957.
Nazeeb, Mohd 43659.
Wood, B.J. 41291.
author_facet 1987 International Oil Palm/Palm Oil Conference. Progress Prospects June23-26 : Kuala Lumpur : 43667.
Loong, S.G. 41957.
Nazeeb, Mohd 43659.
Wood, B.J. 41291.
author_sort 1987 International Oil Palm/Palm Oil Conference. Progress Prospects June23-26 : Kuala Lumpur : 43667.
title Trials on reducing the non-productive period at oil palm replanting.
title_short Trials on reducing the non-productive period at oil palm replanting.
title_full Trials on reducing the non-productive period at oil palm replanting.
title_fullStr Trials on reducing the non-productive period at oil palm replanting.
title_full_unstemmed Trials on reducing the non-productive period at oil palm replanting.
title_sort trials on reducing the non-productive period at oil palm replanting.
publisher Kuala Lumpur : PORIM,
work_keys_str_mv AT 1987internationaloilpalmpalmoilconferenceprogressprospectsjune2326kualalumpur43667 trialsonreducingthenonproductiveperiodatoilpalmreplanting
AT loongsg41957 trialsonreducingthenonproductiveperiodatoilpalmreplanting
AT nazeebmohd43659 trialsonreducingthenonproductiveperiodatoilpalmreplanting
AT woodbj41291 trialsonreducingthenonproductiveperiodatoilpalmreplanting
_version_ 1756056055171776512
spelling dig-fedepalma-123456789-744422022-08-05T10:00:46Z Trials on reducing the non-productive period at oil palm replanting. 1987 International Oil Palm/Palm Oil Conference. Progress Prospects June23-26 : Kuala Lumpur : 43667. Loong, S.G. 41957. Nazeeb, Mohd 43659. Wood, B.J. 41291. Costos. Cultivo intercalado. Elaeis guineensis. Ganoderma. Maduración. Siembra. Renovación de cultivos Palma de aceite Replanting posed a heavy cost that offsets profits from productive areas, due to the period with no income, as well as the actual cost. Good agronomy has reduced the immature period of oil palms in recent decades. Further possibilities have been investigated in a series of six trials reported here, which concern optimum idposal of the old stand, underplanting, and the field planting of more advanced planting materials (APM). A land clearing trials showed that leaving felled old palms on site costs only about a third of breaking them up mecanically, with or without burning. No disadvantage in growth of young palms nor in accessibility, was found. In an underplanting trial, underplanted palms grew slower, in correlation with the time and proportion of the old stand reamining. In all treatments the old stand completely felled within two years, and after 1 1/2 years of yielding production of the new palms was equalising. Total yield from both old and new stand was greater with retention of part of the old stand. With care, felling the old stand didn't damage the new. Longer retention in conventional nurseries in the older materials trial did not much improve speed to maturity. In the APM trial giant nuersey polybags and winder spacing gave bigger palms for field planting. At 6 months in the field, they have bunches in the best treatments. In transplanting feasibility and optimun age for transplanting trials, a special machine transplanted young field palms, offering possibilities of strategically locative advanced field nurseries. Work is proceeding to optimises this. Land preparation may rule out underplanting, but not use of APM. Pests and diseases generally appear not be limiting, but a precaution against Ganoderma, complete unearthing of the role of the old palms is recommended.The economics favour these techniques, which lead to other possible options, such as a shorter planting cycle. 9 ref. Replanting posed a heavy cost that offsets profits from productive areas, due to the period with no income, as well as the actual cost. Good agronomy has reduced the immature period of oil palms in recent decades. Further possibilities have been investigated in a series of six trials reported here, which concern optimum idposal of the old stand, underplanting, and the field planting of more advanced planting materials (APM). A land clearing trials showed that leaving felled old palms on site costs only about a third of breaking them up mecanically, with or without burning. No disadvantage in growth of young palms nor in accessibility, was found. In an underplanting trial, underplanted palms grew slower, in correlation with the time and proportion of the old stand reamining. In all treatments the old stand completely felled within two years, and after 1 1/2 years of yielding production of the new palms was equalising. Total yield from both old and new stand was greater with retention of part of the old stand. With care, felling the old stand didn't damage the new. Longer retention in conventional nurseries in the older materials trial did not much improve speed to maturity. In the APM trial giant nuersey polybags and winder spacing gave bigger palms for field planting. At 6 months in the field, they have bunches in the best treatments. In transplanting feasibility and optimun age for transplanting trials, a special machine transplanted young field palms, offering possibilities of strategically locative advanced field nurseries. Work is proceeding to optimises this. Land preparation may rule out underplanting, but not use of APM. Pests and diseases generally appear not be limiting, but a precaution against Ganoderma, complete unearthing of the role of the old palms is recommended.The economics favour these techniques, which lead to other possible options, such as a shorter planting cycle. 1987. text eng Kuala Lumpur : PORIM,